The High Court's Debate Over 'Fair Share' Union Fees
Law360, New York ( February 3, 2016, 3:06 PM EST) -- Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, argued on Jan. 11, 2016, is one of those U. S. Supreme Court cases in which important constitutional principles are inseparably entwined with matters of public policy and pure politics. At issue in Friedrichs is the constitutionality of the "agency," or "fair share," fee charged by a union to nonmember, public sector employees that it represents. Under current law, and in those states that do not have an applicable right-to-work law, employees that choose to not be a union member may still be charged for the collective bargaining services that the union provides to the bargaining unit to which such employees belong. . . .
Law360 is on it, so you are, too.
A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.
Law firms are actively looking for ways to incorporate artificial intelligence into their workflow as it becomes ever more common. More than half of surveyed attorneys at U.S. law firms use generative AI for some purpose — up significantly from less than a third of attorneys who participated in the Law360 Pulse AI Survey last year.