Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Williams Cedar
-
Order | Filed: June 11, 2024 | Entered: June 11, 2024 In Re Laundress Marketing and Product Liability Litigation
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability | New York Southern
Stipulation and Order ~Util - Terminate Motions
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING ESI PROTOCOL: The Parties in the above-captioned consolidated litigation submit the following Stipulation and Order Regarding ESI Protocol. The parties, through their respective counsel, agree to produce documents and electronically stored information in this case in accordance with certain specifications and jointly move the Court for entry of the following ESI Protocol. Upon consideration, the Court finds that the parties' Joint Motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. The ESI Protocol is outlined below. As further set forth by this Order. SO ORDERED. Motions terminated: 132 LETTER MOTION for Discovery Re Entry of Proposed Protective Order and Proposed ESI Protocol addressed to Judge Jesse M. Furman from Paul Sweeny dated 6/10/2024. filed by Judy Stilwill, Deborah Geschwind, Lori Ostenfeld. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 6/11/2024) (tg)
-
Order | Filed: June 11, 2024 In Re Laundress Marketing and Product Liability Litigation
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability | New York Southern
Order
STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material... This stipulation binds the parties to treat as confidential the documents so classified. This Court, however, has not reviewed the documents referenced herein; therefore, by so ordering this stipulation, the Court makes no finding as to whether the documents are confidential. That finding will be made, if ever, upon a document-by-document review pursuant to the procedures set forth in the Court's Individual Rules and Practices and subject to the presumption in favor of public access to "judicial documents." See generally Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 11 0, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006). To that end, the Court does not "so order" any provision to the extent that it purports to authorize the parties to file documents under seal without a prior court order. See New York ex rel. Khurana v. Spherion Corp., No. 15-CV-6605 (JMF), 2019 WL 3294170 (S.D.N.Y. July 19, 2019). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 132. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 6/11/2024) (tg)
-
Order | Filed: June 10, 2024 | Entered: June 10, 2024 MALINOWSKI et al v. SOLVAY SPECIALTY POLYMERS, USA, LLC et al
P.I.: Other | New Jersey
Order
TEXT ORDER: In response to the parties' letter of June 4, 2024 filed in Case No. 19-21573, Giordano v. Solvay Specialty Polymers USA, LLC, at ECF No. 294, the parties are referred to form AO85, found here, to consent to have the magistrate judge conduct all proceedings in this matter. So Ordered by Judge Edward S. Kiel on 6/10/2024. (gn, )
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login