Mealey's California Section 17200

  • February 20, 2024

    Google Says UCL, Other Claims In AI Training Lawsuit Fail

    SAN FRANCISCO — Vague allegations and hypothetical damages involving the scraping of websites and other sources for data used in the training of artificial intelligence cannot form the basis of California unfair competition law (UCL) and other claims because the potential usage was adequately disclosed and individuals lack a privacy interest in information they themselves publicly disclosed, Google LLC tells a federal judge in California in seeking dismissal.

  • February 20, 2024

    High Court Won’t Hear Meta’s Appeal Over Standing In Biased Housing Ads Row

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — In its Feb. 20 order list, the U.S. Supreme Court denied a petition for certiorari by Meta Platforms Inc. (formerly Facebook Inc.) in a putative class action in which it has been accused of participating in housing discrimination, leaving unanswered the social network operator’s question over the proper standard for determining whether a plaintiff has standing to sue under Article III of the U.S. Constitution.

  • February 16, 2024

    Class Certification Affirmed In Dispute Over Insurer’s Square Footage Calculation

    SAN FRANCISCO — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a lower federal court’s ruling that granted an insured’s motion for class certification in a lawsuit alleging that a homeowners insurer improperly calculated the square footage of California homes, finding that the lower court did not abuse its discretion in redefining the certified class.

  • February 16, 2024

    Judge Disqualifies Law Firm From Job Search Sites’ Row Over Prior Representation

    SAN JOSE, Calif. — A California federal judge hearing a lawsuit brought by the operators of a job search and resume-creation website against a competitor for copyright infringement and violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) granted the plaintiffs’ motion to disqualify a law firm whose attorneys included the defendant’s general counsel and one defendant’s wife, due to the firm’s prior representation of the plaintiffs.

  • February 15, 2024

    Judge Dismisses UCL Suit Accusing Gas Stove Maker Of Concealing Pollutants

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge found that a consumer has standing to bring claims that he was deceived into overpaying for a gas stove because the manufacturer allegedly concealed that it emits air pollutants when used as directed, but granted the manufacturer’s motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s California consumer protection law claims with prejudice for failure to comply with presuit notice requirements for toxic exposure claims.

  • February 15, 2024

    California AG, Company Settle Medical Waste, Patient Records Disposal Suit For $5M

    STOCKTON, Calif. — The California Attorney General’s Office and a medical diagnostics company filed a stipulation for entry of final judgment and permanent injunction in a state court, under which the company will pay roughly $5 million in part for civil penalties under California’s unfair competition law (UCL) due to the company’s improper disposal of medical waste and patient records.

  • February 14, 2024

    Consent Decree Entered Under 1 Dismissal In Case Over Alleged Counterfeit Policies

    LOUISVILLE, Ky. — A variety of claims and parties have been dismissed under agreements in a sprawling suit over allegations of fraud, trademark counterfeiting and trademark infringement involving captive reinsurance programs, with a Kentucky federal court permanently enjoining two defendants “from future infringement of Plaintiffs’ trademarks.”

  • February 14, 2024

    Judge Unseals Grant Of Summary Judgment In Apple Watch Heart Rate Tracking Row

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge on Feb. 13 unsealed a partly redacted version of his order granting Apple’s Inc.’s motion for summary judgment on claims that it violated federal antitrust law and California’s unfair competition law (UCL) by impairing a competitor’s heart rate tracking app tailored for the Apple Watch to monopolize the market.

  • February 14, 2024

    Judge Dismisses Bulk Of Writers’ Copyright-Based Claims Against OpenAI

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge granted in part and denied in part a motion by OpenAI Inc. and its affiliated companies involved in developing the ChatGPT artificial intelligence (AI) program to dismiss claims brought against it in two putative class actions filed by authors who say ChatGPT’s development and operations infringe their copyrights.

  • February 14, 2024

    Magistrate Judge Denies Daubert Motions In Mislabeling Suit Against Rust-Oleum

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal magistrate judge denied a plaintiff’s and a defendant’s motions to disqualify each other’s expert witnesses in a class action against Rust-Oleum Corp. for allegedly violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) by deceptively labeling its KRUD KUTTER cleaning products as “non-toxic” and “Earth friendly.”

  • February 13, 2024

    Amazon Accused Of Unfairly Imposing New Ad-Free Streaming Costs In Class Suit

    SEATTLE — A California resident filed a putative class action in Washington federal court accusing Amazon.com Inc. of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws by abruptly inserting ads into its Amazon Prime video streaming services unless subscribers pay a higher monthly fee.

  • February 13, 2024

    Federal Judge Denies Remand Of Class Suit Over No Breaks From Walkie Talkies

    LOS ANGELES — A putative class complaint accusing a hospitality company of wage-and-hour violations due to its policy requiring workers to keep their walkie talkies on throughout their shifts, even during breaks, contains violations for which the amount in controversy requires the case to remain in federal court, a federal judge in California ruled, denying a motion to remand.

  • February 12, 2024

    Judge Awards Attorney Fees After Rejecting Ana De Armas Fans’ Movie Trailer Claims

    LOS ANGELES — A California federal judge has awarded a Hollywood studio more than $126,000 in attorney fees under California’s anti-strategic lawsuit against public participation (anti-SLAPP) law after it won a motion to strike certain claims from a suit accusing it of deceptively advertising a film using footage of actress Ana De Armas that was cut from the final film.

  • February 08, 2024

    Judge Certifies Class Accusing Rust-Oleum Of Mislabeling Products As ‘Non-Toxic’

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal magistrate judge granted a motion to certify a class of consumers accusing Rust-Oleum Corp. of deceiving consumers in violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) by labeling its KRUD KUTTER cleaning products as “non-toxic” and “Earth friendly.”

  • February 08, 2024

    Judge Rules In Apple’s Favor In Challenge Brought By Heartbeat App Developer

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge entered final judgment in favor of Apple Inc. after entering a sealed order granting Apple’s motion for summary judgment on claims that it violated federal antitrust law and California’s unfair competition law (UCL) by allegedly violating its patents for heart rate tracking technology tailored for the Apple Watch to monopolize the market.

  • February 07, 2024

    Cigna: ERISA Plans Bar Algorithm Health Care Claims; UCL Claims Lack Specificity

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Insureds’ cannot demonstrate denial of claims based solely on review by an algorithm or that the use of such a tool would violate the provisions of their Employee Retirement Income Security Act plans, the insurer tells a federal judge in California in a motion to dismiss while arguing that the plaintiffs fail to plead their California unfair competition law (UCL) claims with requisite specificity.

  • February 05, 2024

    Panel:  Senior Challenging $52,000 Solar Panel Loan Not Required To Arbitrate

    FRESNO, Calif. — A California appellate panel affirmed a judge’s refusal to compel arbitration of a senior citizen’s lawsuit against a solar panel installation company and an affiliated lending company for violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws, finding that no valid arbitration agreement was entered and that the woman did not appear to have signed or understood that she had entered a $52,000 loan contract.

  • February 05, 2024

    Judge Denies Mortgage Servicer’s Motion To Dismiss Loan Modification UCL Suit

    LOS ANGELES — A California federal judge granted in part and denied in part a mortgage loan servicer’s motion to dismiss a suit accusing it of improperly denying a borrower’s loan modification applications, finding that the plaintiff’s claims are not time-barred because she now alleges that she recently discovered that the servicer sent her statements with errors that contributed to the principal balance on her loan.

  • February 05, 2024

    Judge: Apple’s Suit Against Alleged Hackers Belongs In California, Not Israel

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge denied two Israeli technology companies’ motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought against them by Apple Inc. based on a forum non conveniens defense, finding that Apple’s claims that the defendants violated federal and California law by allegedly developing malware to hack into Apple’s servers and consumer products may be heard in California.

  • February 05, 2024

    Judge Partly Dismisses Suit Against Walmart Over Malic Acid In ‘Natural’ Products

    LOS ANGELES — A California federal judge granted in part and denied in part Walmart Inc.’s motion to dismiss a putative class action accusing it of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws by deceptively labeling certain store-brand “Great Value” products as containing “natural” flavor when they are allegedly flavored with synthetic malic acid.

  • February 05, 2024

    Judge: No Coverage Owed For Unfair Competition Suit Brought Against Insured

    SAN DIEGO — A federal judge in California concluded that an insurer has no duty to defend its furniture delivery company insured against an underlying misappropriation of trade secrets and unfair competition lawsuit brought by a competitor, granting the insurer’s motion for summary judgment in the insured’s breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit.

  • February 02, 2024

    Judge Limits Experts, Certifies Class Action For Deceptive ChapStick Label Suit

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge granted a motion to certify a class action asserting California unfair competition law (UCL) violations for deceptive labeling of certain ChapStick products and agreed to exclude dueling experts after finding their testimony irrelevant.

  • February 02, 2024

    Judge Remands Deceptive Marketing Suit Against ‘Kars 4 Kids’ Charity

    SANTA ANA, Calif. — A California federal judge remanded to state court a lawsuit brought against the “Kars 4 Kids” charity and related entities by a plaintiff who claims that he was deceived into making a donation based on his belief the charity was nonsectarian and nationwide when it in fact primarily benefits Orthodox Jewish children in New York and New Jersey, finding that the amount in controversy is below the minimum required amount for diversity jurisdiction.

  • February 01, 2024

    Calif. Federal Judge Grants Partial Summary Judgment In Pipeline Rupture Dispute

    LOS ANGELES — Two companies that formerly operated an oil pipeline that ruptured and contaminated residential property in Southern California are entitled to summary judgment on several claims, including breach of written easement contracts brought by the owners of property that the pipeline crosses, a California federal judge found in partly granting the companies’ motion for partial summary judgment.

  • February 01, 2024

    Airline And Insurer Agree To Dismiss UCL, Bad Faith Suit Over Passenger’s Coma

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge on Jan. 31 entered an order of dismissal after an airline and two insurers entered a joint stipulation requesting dismissal of the airline’s suit accusing one insurer of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and bad faith based on an allegedly improper denial of coverage for a separate lawsuit brought against the airline by the family of a quadriplegic man who fell into a coma while traveling, which recently settled for $30 million.