Mealey's Construction Defects Insurance

  • March 28, 2023

    Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Insurer’s Coverage Claims Against Roofer

    PHILADELPHIA — A federal judge in Pennsylvania dismissed an insurer’s declaratory relief action stemming from an underlying faulty workmanship lawsuit against a roofing contractor, ruling that he lacks subject matter jurisdiction to hear the action under the Declaratory Judgment Act (DJA).

  • March 28, 2023

    General Liability Insurer Dismissed From Mold Coverage Dispute

    LAS VEGAS — Without providing further detail, a federal judge in Nevada dismissed a professional liability insurer’s claims against a contractor’s general liability insurer in a mold and moisture damage coverage dispute.

  • March 23, 2023

    Judge: Defective IGUs Caused No Injuries, Property Damage To Condo Project

    SAN DIEGO — An insurer is entitled to summary judgment on claims brought by a subcontractor stemming from defective window-wall systems furnished by the subcontractor and installed in a condominium tower project because the issues with defective insulated-glass units (IGUs) in the window-wall system did not involve any injury or property damage to anything other than the IGUs, a federal judge in California ruled.

  • March 23, 2023

    Claims In Negligent Floor Painting Work Coverage Suit Pass Early Dismissal Test

    LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — A federal judge in Arkansas denied an insurer’s motion to dismiss in a coverage dispute stemming from a painter’s negligent graphic and line painting work on a newly installed vinyl gym floor, ruling that a subcontractor plausibly stated its declaratory judgment and breach of contract claims.

  • March 22, 2023

    Judge Orders Claims Against Insurer In Defects Coverage Suit Dismissed

    TACOMA, Wash. — Three of five factors set forth under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) strongly support dismissal of claims against an insurer in a coverage dispute brought by homeowners stemming from a construction defects lawsuit over the construction of homes in a housing development, while four of the factors support dismissal based on the homeowners’ persistent failure to meet court-ordered deadlines and their failure to properly prepare for trial, a federal judge in Washington ruled in dismissing all claims against the insurer with prejudice.

  • March 21, 2023

    Hotel Operator’s Claims Against Builder In Faulty Work Coverage Suit Dismissed

    LAFAYETTE, La. — A federal judge in Louisiana dismissed all claims brought by a hotel operator with prejudice in a coverage dispute alleging faulty workmanship in the building of a hotel against a contractor after the parties agreed to a settlement.

  • March 20, 2023

    Insurers Owe Continued Coverage For Underlying Negligence Suit, Judge Says

    SEATTLE — A Washington federal judge denied a motion for summary judgment filed by insurers in a suit seeking coverage for an underlying suit filed against the insured over the insured’s alleged negligent installation of a sewage pipeline because under Washington law, the insurers have a continued duty to defend the insured as the underlying allegations are potentially covered under the policies at issue.

  • March 16, 2023

    Magistrate Had Jurisdiction To Issue Order In Water Damage Coverage Suit

    ROCHESTER, N.Y. — A federal magistrate judge in New York on March 15 rejected objections to his ruling that insurers in a lawsuit stemming from former homeowners’ alleged failure to disclose structural and environmental issues in connection with a home they sold owe no duty to defend the former homeowners, finding that his ruling was not a report and recommendation because the insurers consented to his jurisdiction in the action.

  • March 15, 2023

    Fire Suppression System Leaks Were 1 Occurrence Under Builders Risk Policies

    TAMPA, Fla. — A federal judge in Florida ruled that insureds are entitled to summary judgment on their claims that several leaks discovered in a fire suppression system over a period of time are considered one “occurrence” under a plain reading of two builders risk policies and that, as a result, a majority of the claims made in response to the leaks are subject to just one deductible.

  • March 15, 2023

    Subcontractor’s Damages Coverage Suit Dismissed After Remaining Parties Settle

    SEATTLE — A federal judge in Washington issued an order dismissing a coverage dispute stemming from a subcontractor’s alleged damages incurred from its work on a construction project and an insurance broker’s alleged failure to submit the subcontractor’s claims to the necessary general liability insurers after the remaining parties reached a settlement.

  • March 14, 2023

    Lack Of Water Damage Timeline Absolves Insurer Of Coverage, Duty To Defend

    ATLANTA — An insurer owes no duty to cover, defend or indemnify a general contractor or subcontractor for underlying construction defects lawsuits filed against the contractors stemming from water intrusion damages at a hotel construction project because no evidence was provided showing that the property damage took place during the policy periods, a federal judge in Georgia ruled.

  • March 10, 2023

    Policy Endorsement Bars Coverage To Subcontractor In Faulty Installation Suit

    WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — A commercial general liability insurer is entitled to summary judgment on its declaratory judgment claims in a lawsuit stemming from a subcontractor’s alleged faulty installation of cladding and glazing systems in a construction project because the policy’s “course-of-construction” exclusion bars coverage, a federal judge in Florida ruled.

  • March 10, 2023

    Damages Claim Remains In Coverage Suit Over Faulty Breaker Installation

    SAN DIEGO — A federal judge in California ruled that an insured has sufficiently pleaded its claim for punitive damages in a coverage dispute over its insurer’s refusal to indemnify the insurer in an underlying property damage lawsuit stemming from the sale and installation of defective circuit breakers under California law because, at this stage of the litigation, the insured is not required to show “with ‘clear and convincing evidence’” that the insurer acted with “‘oppression, fraud, or malice.’”

  • February 27, 2023

    COMMENTARY: Construction Defect Claims: A 2022 Update Part II

    By Thomas F. Segalla, Michael T. Glascott, Ashlyn M. Capote, Adam R. Durst, Sean P. Hvisdas and Samantha M. McDermott

  • March 09, 2023

    Contractor Relieved Of Liability For Independent Contractor’s Negligence

    NEW YORK — A New York trial court did not err in dismissing a complaint brought by an insurer as subrogee of a homeowner whose home was damaged after wiring that was cut during renovation work in a garage started a fire because the damage was caused by an independent contractor and, thus, the contractor performing the renovations cannot be held liable, a Second Department New York Supreme Court Appellate Division panel ruled in affirming the dismissal March 8.

  • March 09, 2023

    Insurer Has No Duty To Defend Subcontractor Based On New Construction Exclusions

    SEATTLE — An insurer did not breach its duty to defend a subcontractor in an underlying construction defects lawsuit brought by homeowners because the subcontractor’s policy excluded coverage for the damages the homeowners sought under a series of new construction exclusions, a federal judge in Washington ruled.

  • March 09, 2023

    Lack Of Property Damage Precludes Contractor From Coverage Over Faulty Welds

    CHICAGO — A federal judge in Illinois ruled that insurers do not owe a general contractor coverage as an additional insured in a coverage dispute stemming from a subcontractor’s defective welding work at O’Hare International Airport because claims made by the general contractor in an underlying lawsuit were not for “property damage.”

  • March 08, 2023

    Subrogation Waiver Absolved Contractor Of Liability, Indiana High Court Rules

    INDIANAPOLIS — An Indiana trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of an insurer and tenants of a office complex in a coverage and subrogation dispute against a sprinkler installation contactor because a subrogation waiver barred coverage for the insurer, while the contactor owed no contractual duty to the other tenants, a divided Indiana Supreme Court ruled in reversing and remanding.

  • March 03, 2023

    Insurer’s Bid To Place Other Insurer On The Hook For Damages Coverage Denied

    SAN FRANCISCO — An excess liability insurer is not entitled to summary judgment on its claims for equitable indemnity and/or equitable subrogation against other insurers involved in a construction defects lawsuit against the builder in charge of the Millennium Tower project because the insurer has failed to show that coverage it paid should have been paid by another insurer based on the timeline for when the alleged damages were first discovered, a federal judge in California ruled.

  • March 01, 2023

    Warranty Exclusion Barred Contractor From Seeking Defense In Defects Suit

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California trial court correctly found that an insurer owed no duty to defend or indemnify its insured contractor in a construction defects lawsuit stemming from its building of a home because the claims brought against the contractor are barred by the policy’s contractors warranty exclusion, a California appellate court panel said Feb. 28 in affirming judgment in favor of the insurer.

  • March 01, 2023

    Condo Association Not Entitled To New Trial Over Late Notice Jury Instruction

    SEATTLE — A jury was presented with sufficient evidence to determine whether a condominium’s apartment owners association’s late notice of water intrusion damage caused by construction defects resulted in both actual and substantial prejudice to an insurer and the jury’s finding in favor of the insurer was not precluded by the insurer’s coverage determination, a federal judge in Washington ruled in denying the association’s motion for a partial new trial.

  • March 01, 2023

    Panel: Insurer Did Not Waive Exclusion In Denying Coverage In Water Runoff Suit

    ATLANTA — A federal district court’s finding that an insurer’s failure in its denial letter to state that a pollution exclusion barred coverage for a contractor in a lawsuit stemming from grading work performed by the contractor did not amount to a waiver of the insurer’s argument against coverage in an ensuing coverage dispute with the contractor because the damage claimed in the lawsuit “squarely falls” under the exclusion, an 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel said in affirming summary judgment for the insurer.

  • February 27, 2023

    CGL Insurer’s Claims Against Contractor In Coverage Suit Deemed Not Ripe

    DALLAS — A commercial general liability insurer’s claims in a coverage dispute against a contractor stemming from construction defects alleged by a developer in an underlying construction defects and breach of contract lawsuit are not ripe for adjudication because the insurer seeks declaratory relief that it owes the contractor no duty to indemnify even though the underlying lawsuit has not been resolved, a federal judge in Texas ruled in dismissing the insurer’s claims.

  • February 24, 2023

    Panel:  Insurer Not Required To Indemnify Contractor For Water Main Repairs

    DES MOINES, Iowa — An insurer does not owe a contractor a duty to indemnify for damages incurred by the contractor to repair a water main that was broken during excavation work at a construction site by an insured subcontractor because no claim has been made against the contractor for the damages, and the contractor has not obtained a judgment against the subcontractor, an Iowa Court of Appeals panel ruled in affirming summary judgment for the insurer.

  • February 23, 2023

    Insureds’ Liability Does Not Equal An Occurrence Under Policies For Coverage

    ROCHESTER, N.Y. — A federal magistrate judge in New York found that insurers have no duty to defend former homeowners in a lawsuit stemming from the former homeowners’ alleged failure to disclose structural and environmental issues in connection with a home they sold because the former homeowners have failed to provide facts supporting their argument that their liability as former homeowners equates to an occurrence under the insurance policies.