Mealey's Coronavirus

  • October 25, 2023

    Del. Court: Worker Contracted COVID-19 On The Job, But Disease Isn’t Occupational

    WILMINGTON, Del. — A Perdue Farms Inc. employee showed that he contracted COVID-19 at the Perdue plant but failed to show that his illness was an occupational disease pursuant to the Delaware Worker’s Compensation Act (WCA), a Delaware judge ruled, affirming a decision by the Industrial Accident Board denying the worker’s petition to determine compensation due.

  • October 24, 2023

    PPP Loan Recipient Seeks Dismissal Of False Claims Act Suit By Former Employee

    SAN DIEGO — In a lawsuit brought on behalf of the United States under the False Claims Act (FCA) by a financial officer alleging that the company that formerly employed him received a Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan during the COVID-19 pandemic by altering or misrepresenting its payroll records, the company moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim and pursuant to the FCA’s public disclosure bar.

  • October 23, 2023

    Georgia Federal Magistrate Judge Limits Testimony On Source Of COVID-19 Infection

    SAVANNAH, Ga. — An expert can testify that a longshoreman did not contract COVID-19 while aboard a vessel but he cannot opine on alternative sources of infection, a federal magistrate judge in Georgia ruled.

  • October 23, 2023

    Military Members’ Vaccine Cases Dismissed After Undisclosed Costs Settlement

    TAMPA, Fla. — A federal judge in Florida in an Oct. 20 docket entry dismissed with prejudice two complaints by military members challenging a COVID-19 vaccine mandate; the order was filed one day after the parties filed a joint stipulation of dismissal after reaching an undisclosed settlement on costs.

  • October 23, 2023

    5th Circuit Affirms Refusal To Remand And Dismissal Of Coronavirus Coverage Suit

    NEW ORLEANS — The Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a lower federal court’s denial of insureds’ motion to remand a coronavirus coverage dispute and its grant of the commercial property insurer’s motion to dismiss a breach of contract lawsuit seeking coverage for losses arising from the coronavirus pandemic, finding that the insureds failed to plausibly plead that the coronavirus caused direct physical damage to their insured property.

  • October 20, 2023

    En Banc Review Denied To COVID-19 Test Provider Seeking Reimbursement From Insurer

    SAN FRANCISCO — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals denied a petition for rehearing en banc sought by a COVID-19 test provider after a panel of the court affirmed the judgment of a California federal court dismissing five complaints brought by the provider seeking reimbursement from an insurer for COVID testing services under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act.

  • October 20, 2023

    Miss. Federal Judge:  Tribal Remedies Must Be Exhausted Before Filing Federal Suit

    NORTHERN JACKSON, Miss. — A Mississippi federal judge stayed claims brought by two men regarding a COVID-19 mask mandate enforced by the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians (MBCI) at one of the tribe’s casinos because the men failed to exhaust their tribal court remedies before bringing their action in federal court.

  • October 20, 2023

    Interim Class Counsel Appointed In Amazon COVID-19 Screenings Case

    FRESNO, Calif. — A federal judge in California appointed Hodges & Foty LLP interim class counsel in a case by employees accusing Amazon.com Services LLC of failing to pay workers for time spent undergoing COVID-19 symptom screenings before their shifts.

  • October 20, 2023

    9th Circuit Requests Briefing On Mootness In Challenge To COVID Misinformation Law

    SAN FRANCISCO — A panel of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in a per curiam order directed the parties in a lawsuit challenging California’s medical professional COVID-19 misinformation law to file supplemental briefs within 14 days on the question of whether California Senate Bill 815 (SB 815) rendered the case moot.

  • October 19, 2023

    Parent Critical Of COVID Policy Seeks Summary Judgment In Suit Against School Board

    DETROIT — In a lawsuit by a parent against a Michigan school district and individual school board members stemming from the board members’ responses to the parent’s criticism of the school district’s COVID-19 policy, the parent moved for summary judgment on Oct. 18, contending that there are no genuine issues of material fact as to her allegations that the board members violated her First Amendment free speech rights or that one board member’s illegal actions were done on behalf of the board.

  • October 19, 2023

    BU Students Seek Reversal Of Summary Judgment Ruling In Pandemic Closure Suit

    BOSTON — A trial court erred when it granted summary judgment to the trustees of Boston University (BU) in a putative class complaint brought after in-person classes transitioned to online-only in March 2020 due to the coronavirus pandemic, the students who brought the complaint write in an omnibus appellant brief filed in the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, arguing that the ruling came after the court “correctly identified disputed issues of material fact.”

  • October 19, 2023

    Air, Space Force Members Argue For Denial Of Certiorari In Vaccine Mandate Appeal

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court should not grant a petition for a writ of certiorari by the Air Force secretary and others seeking vacatur of the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ ruling that left in place class certification and a classwide injunction in a vaccine mandate case where the mandate has since been rescinded, members of the U.S. Air Force and Space Force who refuse to get the COVID-19 vaccine for religious reasons argue in an Oct. 18 opposition brief, asserting that the appeal is not moot.

  • October 19, 2023

    PPP Loan Recipient: No Factual Issue That Loan Forgiveness Denied Improperly

    CHICAGO — A Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan recipient that was denied eligibility for loan forgiveness because of the nature of its business moved for summary judgment in its lawsuit against the Small Business Administration (SBA), contending that there was no question of material fact that the SBA applied an interim final rule to deny forgiveness that was in contravention of the provisions of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, under which the PPP was created.

  • October 18, 2023

    Supplier Seeks Reimbursement From Manufacturer For Unsold Hydroxychloroquine

    TRENTON, N.J. — A pharmaceutical supplier sued a pharmaceutical manufacturer in New Jersey federal court, alleging that the manufacturer breached a contract for the purchase of large quantities of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine phosphate for the treatment and prevention of COVID-19 in failing to provide refunds for unpurchased product and to indemnify the supplier against claims by a governmental customer that the prices set by the manufacturer violated state law.

  • October 18, 2023

    Baylor As Amicus Tells Texas High Court Pandemic Liability Act Is Retroactive

    AUSTIN, Texas — The Texas Supreme Court should find that the Texas Pandemic Liability Protection Act (PLPA) may be applied retroactively to a Southern Methodist University (SMU) student’s breach of contract claim in a putative class complaint over the school’s closure during the early days of the coronavirus pandemic, Baylor University argues in the latest amicus curiae brief addressing a question certified by the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.

  • October 18, 2023

    Former NBA Player Alleges Disability Insurer Breached Contract, Acted In Bad Faith

    CHARLOTTE, N.C. — A former National Basketball Association (NBA) player alleges in a complaint filed in North Carolina federal court that his disability insurer acted in bad faith and breached its contract by denying his disability benefits claim because he was rendered totally and permanently disabled by a diagnosis of myopericarditis, an inflammation of the lining of his heart, following two bouts with COVID-19.

  • October 18, 2023

    New York Justice Dismisses Counterclaims Against Insurers In COVID-19 Coverage Suit

    NEW YORK — A New York justice granted insurers’ motion to dismiss their insurers’ counterclaims in a coronavirus coverage dispute, finding that the case is “factually indistinguishable” from Consolidated Rest. Operations, Inc. v. Westport Ins. Corp. as to “policyholder COVID-19 claims based on a policy covering ‘direct physical loss, damage or destruction to property.’”

  • October 17, 2023

    Delta Settles Pandemic Flight Cancellation Class Case For More Than $27M

    ATLANTA — A federal judge in Georgia granted final approval of a class settlement in a case by Delta Air Lines Inc. customers who were provided credits and not requested refunds for flights canceled between March 2020 and April 2021; the agreement will provide more than $27 million to settlement class members who make eligible claims, as well as separate payments of more than $2.3 million for attorney fees and costs and $3,000 for a service award.

  • October 17, 2023

    1st Circuit Upholds Ruling For University Board In Students’ Pandemic-Related Case

    BOSTON — A First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel affirmed a trial court’s ruling for a university board in a putative class complaint by students seeking full or partial refunds of tuition and fees after the University of Rhode Island (URI) transitioned to online learning and largely shut down in-person services in March 2020 due to the coronavirus pandemic.

  • October 16, 2023

    6th Circuit Denies Rehearing After Upholding University’s COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate

    CINCINNATI — The Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals denied a petition for rehearing en banc filed by a Michigan State University (MSU) worker after a Sixth Circuit panel ruled in the putative class complaint that the school’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate did not violate employees’ constitutional rights and was not preempted by federal law.

  • October 16, 2023

    Supreme Court Grants Certiorari In 2nd Challenge To Chevron Deference

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on Oct. 13 granted a petition for a writ of certiorari in a second case challenging the doctrine of Chevron deference and ordered that it be briefed on a schedule allowing argument “in tandem” with a pending case pertaining to the same issue, both of which involve challenges to regulations that require fishing vessels to pay federal monitors.

  • October 16, 2023

    High Court Denies Cert To Nursing Home Seeking Reversal Of COVID Suit Remand

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on Oct. 16 denied a nursing home’s petition for certiorari seeking to reverse a remand to state court of an elder abuse and negligence suit against it for complications allegedly related to a resident contracting COVID-19 on grounds that the state law negligence claims are preempted by the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act.

  • October 12, 2023

    SBA Argues It Can Deny PPP Loan Forgiveness If Borrower Was Never Eligible For Loan

    AMARILLO, Texas — In an action brought by a truck dealer against the federal government challenging the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) determination that the dealer was not initially eligible for a Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan and thus ineligible for loan forgiveness, the federal government defendants cross-moved for summary judgment while at the same filing their response to the dealer’s prior motion for summary judgment.

  • October 12, 2023

    9th Circuit: Accrued Vacation Owed When Hotel Announced Pandemic Temporary Layoff

    PASADENA, Calif. — A hotel chain owed workers accrued vacation pay when it temporarily laid them off at the start of the coronavirus pandemic as that was “a discharge that triggers the prompt payments provision of” California Labor Code Section 201, a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled, partially reversing a trial court’s summary judgment ruling for Hyatt Corp.

  • October 11, 2023

    Judge Dismisses UCL Claim, Allows Debt-Collection Claims In Mortgage Servicing Row

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal magistrate judge granted in part and denied in part a motion to dismiss a suit brought against a mortgage lender, its affiliate and a servicer, finding that the borrower and a resident of the property at issue did not allege a loss of money as required by their claim for violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) but brought valid debt collection claims for unfair practices pertaining to payment of a consumer debt during a COVID-19 forbearance period.

Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Mealey's Coronavirus archive.