Mealey's Cyber Tech & E-Commerce

  • December 01, 2023

    Shareholders: Lending Platform Misconstrues Judge’s Order In Motion To Reconsider

    CINCINNATI — A lending platform and certain related defendants, accused by shareholders of making inaccurate claims about the platform’s use of artificial intelligence to approve loans, indicated in a notice in an Ohio federal court no opposition to several investment funds’ motion to intervene in the suit, a day after the shareholders filed a memorandum in opposition to the lending platform’s motion to reconsider an order partially dismissing the suit.

  • December 01, 2023

    Law Firm Tells 9th Circuit Rival’s Use Of Mark In Keyword Ad Was Infringing

    SAN FRANCISCO — Asking the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals to reverse a lower court’s summary judgment finding that a competitor’s use of its trademark in a Google keyword advertisement did not infringe, an Arizona law firm in its appellant brief expressed its concern that if the judgment is permitted to stand, it will “severely erode the ability of trademark holders to protect against the misuse of their marks online.”

  • November 30, 2023

    In GitHub AI Copyright Suit, Parties Told To Meet, Confer Not Move To Compel

    SAN FRANCISCO — While a California federal court mulls a second round of motions from OpenAI Inc., GitHub Inc. and Microsoft Corp. seeking dismissal of claims under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and California’s unfair competition law (UCL) related to allegations of improper attribution in the development of an artificial intelligence tool, a magistrate judge denied the plaintiffs’ motion to compel discovery responses in favor of a directive for the parties to meet and confer about discovery disputes.

  • November 28, 2023

    Mothers Say Section 230 Doesn’t Bar UCL Suit Against Roblox For ‘Illegal Gambling’

    SAN FRANCISCO — Two mothers bringing putative class claims in California federal court against Roblox Corp., the operator of an online video game platform played by millions of children, filed a brief opposing its motion to dismiss, urging the court to reject its defense that federal law bars their claims or that it provided only “neutral tools” to third-party companies that allegedly operated gambling games on Roblox.

  • November 28, 2023

    Terror-Aiding Plaintiffs Defend Remand Requests In 9th Circuit Briefs

    SAN FRANCISCO — Countering briefs in which X Corp Inc. (formerly Twitter Inc.), Meta Platforms Inc. (formerly Facebook Inc.) and Google LLC ask the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals to affirm dismissal of two lawsuits seeking to hold them liable for terrorist attacks under the Antiterrorism Act (ATA), the plaintiffs argue that the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in two other ATA cases does not foreclose them from seeking remand in the present cases.

  • November 15, 2023

    COMMENTARY: Developments In The Use Of AI In Financial Investigations

    By Keith Williamson and Robert Cruse

  • November 22, 2023

    As High Court Mulls Tester’s Suit, 4th Circuit Vacates Sanction Of Her Ex-Counsel

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A self-appointed Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) tester filed a letter with the U.S. Supreme Court in a recently argued appeal focusing on testers’ standing in such suits, informing the high court that a Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel had recently vacated a disciplinary ruling against her former attorney, whom she had described as a “distraction” and one of her reasons for unsuccessfully seeking to dismiss the case as moot prior to argument.

  • November 21, 2023

    Google, Consumers, States Reach Final Settlement Of Play Store Antitrust Suits

    SAN FRANCISCO — More than two months after announcing a tentative settlement of monopolization and unfair competition claims centering on Google Inc.’s Play Store, a group of consumers and a coalition of U.S. states, comprising the plaintiffs from two of the antitrust suits consolidated with one filed by Epic Games Inc., teamed up with Google on a notice of executed settlement, informing a California federal court that the parties had finalized the settlement.

  • November 21, 2023

    Judge Dismisses ‘Nonsensical’ Copyright Claims For Meta’s Use Of Books To Train AI

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge on Nov. 20 granted a motion to dismiss the bulk of claims brought by authors in two related putative class actions against Meta Platforms Inc. for copyright infringement based on its use of their written works to train its artificial intelligence software, calling the plaintiffs’ “derivative works” argument “nonsensical.”

  • November 20, 2023

    Dismissal, Protective Order Denied In WhatsApp, NSO Spyware Suit

    OAKLAND, Calif. — An Israeli spyware firm saw two of its motions denied by a California federal judge in a computer fraud suit brought against it by WhatsApp Inc., as she denied a motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens and declined to issue a protective order barring much of the discovery sought by the plaintiff.

  • November 20, 2023

    Judge Certifies Class Of Child Victims In Trafficking Suit Against Pornhub Owners

    SANTA ANA, Calif. — A California federal judge on Nov. 17 certified a class and subclass of victims who were in child sexual abuse material (CSAM) distributed through pornography websites, including Pornhub, that are owned by several Canadian and U.S. entities, writing that a class proceeding would lead to greater “efficiency” in the litigation of the victims’ claims for violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL), child trafficking laws and other statutes, and denied defense motions to exclude two experts.

  • November 17, 2023

    Real Estate Law Firm Sues Cyber Security Insurer For Breach Of Contract

    ASHEVILLE, N.C. — A real estate law firm sued its insurer and a third-party administrator in a North Carolina court, seeking cyber security coverage for gross negligence and obstruction of justice cross-claims arising from a “cyber incident” in 2021 that resulted in the misdirection of funds.

  • November 17, 2023

    Man Allegedly Defamed By ChatGPT Appeals Attorney Fee Ruling

    ATLANTA — A man said in a Nov. 16 notice that he is appealing to the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals a decision by a federal judge in Georgia not to award him attorney fees after OpenAI LLC conceded that it could not defend removal of a defamation case alleging that ChatGPT incorrectly named him as a defendant in a financial misconduct suit.

  • November 17, 2023

    Teens’ Social Media Addiction Claims Partly Dismissed In Products Liability MDL

    OAKLAND, Calif. — In a lengthy and detailed ruling, the California federal judge overseeing the multidistrict litigation alleging products liability claims against the operators of the major social networks partly granted the defendants’ motions to dismiss assertions that they intentionally designed their platforms to be addictive for adolescent users.

  • November 17, 2023

    Record Labels To 2nd Circuit: Vimeo’s Cite Of ‘Stale’ Ruling Doesn’t Show Fair Use

    NEW YORK — A 13-year-old “stale, unpublished” magistrate recommendation does not support the fair use defense of Vimeo Inc. in a copyright infringement dispute over the website operator’s hosting of infringing videos, a group of record labels tell the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, responding to Vimeo’s post-trial letter brief, which it filed at the appeals court’s direction.

  • November 15, 2023

    3 Damages Classes Certified In Student Athletes’ Likeness Case

    OAKLAND, Calif. — A federal judge in California granted a motion to certify three damages classes in a consolidated case by college athletes who allege that they are injured by certain National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) rules that restrict the compensation they may receive for the commercial use of their names, images and likenesses (NIL) by the schools they attend.

  • November 14, 2023

    Commentator Seeks Certiorari, Argument With Social Media Government Coercion Suit

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a supplemental letter brief supporting his bid for certiorari, a conservative political commentator tells the U.S. Supreme Court that his appeal of the dismissal of his free speech claims against California’s secretary of state and Twitter Inc. is irreconcilable with, and would make an excellent companion piece to, another case pertaining to governmental coercion of social media platforms that was recently granted certiorari.

  • November 14, 2023

    Certiorari Sought For 1st, 4th Amendment Issues Over Livestreaming Traffic Stops

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A North Carolina man who was prevented by police from livestreaming a traffic stop asks the U.S. Supreme Court to confirm that his rights under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution were violated, arguing in a reply brief supporting his bid for certiorari that a police department’s attempts to distinguish between recording and livestreaming “are immaterial” to the matters of free speech and qualified immunity at issue in the parties’ competing certiorari petitions.

  • November 13, 2023

    9th Circuit Upholds Scope Of Relief In Row Over ‘Northpointe’ Mark

    SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge in Arizona had “an ample basis for finding” that a defaulting defendant’s use of “NorthPointe” would likely cause confusion with a plaintiff’s “Northpointe at Vistancia” trademark, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has concluded.

  • November 13, 2023

    11th Circuit Upholds Jury Instructions, Sanctions Ruling In Bitcoin Ownership Row

    ATLANTA — Deferring to a trial court’s ruling, an 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel found no error or abuse of discretion in the lower court’s jury instructions, vacating of a sanctions ruling or denial of a new trial motion in finding that a Florida man and his deceased colleague did not have a bitcoin mining partnership that would have entitled the decedent’s estate to half of the value of the voluminous cache of mined bitcoin.

  • November 10, 2023

    SEC Blasts ‘Absurd’ Arguments From Crypto Platform, Says Case Should Proceed

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A cryptocurrency platform is attempting to tear down decades of precedent on securities laws to avoid repercussions for operating as an unlicensed security and misconstrues a longstanding securities precedent in support of its claims, the Securities and Exchange Commission says in a memorandum in opposition to the platform’s motion to dismiss the commission’s complaint against it filed in a federal court in the District of Columbia.

  • November 10, 2023

    Lending Platform Says Judge Misapplied Scienter Factor, Should Fully Dismiss Suit

    CINCINNATI — A day after a lending platform filed a motion asking a federal judge in Ohio to reconsider a ruling that claims made by shareholders about the platform’s use of artificial intelligence to approve loans are actionable, several investment funds filed a motion to intervene in the suit, seeking to ensure that their claims are preserved.

  • November 09, 2023

    Indiana Federal Judge Issues Injunction In Computer Code Theft Row

    HAMMOND, Ind. — Allegations by Illinois Central Railroad Co. (IC) that a former employee stole its computer code and then attempted to copyright the code will proceed with a preliminary injunction in place, a federal judge in Indiana has ruled.

  • November 06, 2023

    DOJ: Deny Kennedy’s Motion To Intervene In State Action Social Media Suit

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court should deny a motion by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to intervene in an appeal of a presently stayed injunction preventing the Biden administration and other governmental parties from getting involved in social media platforms’ content moderation decisions, the Department of Justice (DOJ) says in a brief filed on behalf of the government, arguing that the presidential candidate and his co-plaintiffs in a similar lawsuit against the government have not established the necessary “rare, unusual, or extraordinary” circumstances that would warrant intervention.

  • November 06, 2023

    Divided Panel Upholds $5M Attorney Fee Award In Longstanding Patent Row

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Nov. 3 weighed in for a third time in a dispute over patents allegedly infringed by Amazon.com Inc.’s “S3” and “CloudFront” products, this time affirming in a divided ruling a California federal judge’s $5,187,203.99 attorney fee award on behalf of the e-tailer and Twitch Interactive Inc.