Mealey's Cyber Tech & E-Commerce

  • August 07, 2024

    D.C. Circuit Affirms Finding That DMCA Does Not Run Afoul Of 1st Amendment

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel rejected two technologists’ challenge to the constitutionality of certain provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), holding that a federal district court rightly enforced the statute’s anti-circumvention provision with regard to technological protection measures (TPMs).

  • August 06, 2024

    Twitter: High Court Rulings Show Lower Court Correctly Tossed Free Speech Claims

    PASADENA, Calif. — In a supplemental brief filed in the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Twitter argues that recent U.S. Supreme Court First Amendment rulings finding that private conduct can be “attributable to the government” only when the private party’s decision relates to “government coercion” support its argument that a district court correctly dismissed claims by former President Donald J. Trump and other Twitter users because they failed to allege that suspension of their accounts was a “state action.”

  • August 06, 2024

    Judge Finds Google Liable For Market Monopoly In Sherman Act Antitrust Suit

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A District of Columbia federal judge ruled Aug. 5 that Google violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act by keeping “its monopoly in two product markets in the United States — general search services and general text advertising — through its exclusive distribution agreements,” but that “Google lacks monopoly power in the market for search ads.”

  • August 06, 2024

    Judge Won’t Rethink Partial Dismissal Of Stock Drop Suit Against AI Lending Firm

    CINCINNATI — A federal judge in Ohio on Aug. 5 denied a lending platform’s motion to reconsider a ruling that claims made by shareholders about the platform’s use of artificial intelligence to approve loans are actionable, holding that the lending platform incorrectly argued that the investors’ inability to establish a single factor in a multi-factor test to determine scienter “is so essential that its inapplicability is fatal to Plaintiffs’ claims.”

  • August 05, 2024

    DOJ Complaint Accuses ByteDance, TikTok Of Violating Children’s Privacy Laws

    LOS ANGELES — The United States filed a complaint Aug. 2 in a federal court in California accusing TikTok Inc., ByteDance Ltd. and their affiliates of violating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and its implementing regulations as well as a 2019 court order by knowingly permitting children to create regular rather than “Kids Mode” TikTok accounts and to create, view and share videos and messages with adults.

  • August 02, 2024

    Panel Remands In $2B Jury Verdict Appeal Over Software’s ‘Stolen’ Trade Secrets

    RICHMOND, Va. — A Virginia appellate court reversed a lower court’s judgment and remanded for a new trial after a jury awarded $2,036,860,045 to Appian Corp., a software company offering business process management (BPM) software that sued BPM competitor Pegasystems Inc., alleging that Pega engaged in corporate espionage to steal Appian’s trade secrets, finding that because the lower court “committed a series of errors,” the judgment must be reversed.

  • August 01, 2024

    Judge: Republicans’ UCL Suit Viable Against Google, But Fails On Merits

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A California federal judge in a mixed ruling on July 31 found that Google LLC cannot claim immunity as an online publisher from claims that it violated California’s unfair competition law (UCL) by diverting Republican National Committee (RNC) fundraising emails to users’ spam folders but granted Google’s motion to dismiss on the merits.

  • July 31, 2024

    Investor: CrowdStrike Misled Investors About Testing Before Global Tech Outage

    AUSTIN, Texas — A retirement system says in a putative class complaint filed on July 30 in a Texas federal court that a cybersecurity company and certain of its executives issued misleading claims to investors about its internal testing systems before a recent software glitch caused a global outage of computers on the Microsoft Windows operating system, leading to a steep drop in value for the company’s stock.

  • July 26, 2024

    COMMENTARY: Cyber War Exclusions

    By Peter A. Halprin and Brittany Parks

  • July 30, 2024

    6th Circuit Hears Arguments On State-Action Dispute Over Deleted Facebook Posts

    CINCINNATI — On remand from the U.S. Supreme Court, which ruled that the state-action doctrine requires showing that an official has the authority to speak on behalf of the entity he represents and exercised that authority, the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on July 29 heard oral arguments in a dispute over whether a public official’s deleting posts from his personal Facebook account where he posted about his job constitutes state action.

  • July 30, 2024

    Judge Rejects ‘Unconscionable’ Arbitration Of Class Suit Against Gaming Company

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge denied a gaming company and its co-founders’ motion to compel arbitration of putative class claims against them for violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws by falsely advertising their mobile games as offering live competition, finding that the arbitration agreement contained provisions that would likely cause “years” of delay.

  • July 30, 2024

    Meta Will Pay $1.4 Billion To Settle Texas’ Biometric Data Privacy Lawsuit

    MARSHALL, Texas — Meta Platforms Inc., formerly known as Facebook Inc., will pay $1.4 billion to end claims by Texas that it captured and used the personal biometric data of millions of state residents, according to an agreed final judgment filed in a Texas court on July 30.

  • July 30, 2024

    Federal Circuit: Regulation Applies To Amended Claims In Internet Patent Dispute

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a dispute between a software company and Apple and Motorola over a patent regarding how internet content is displayed on mobile devices, the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals upheld the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s determination that a regulation addressing estoppel provisions in patent office proceedings is valid but vacated and remanded the board’s decision in two reexamination proceedings for it to reconsider the regulation’s application to previously issued claims.

  • July 29, 2024

    Student-Athletes Seek Preliminary Approval Of $2.5B NIL Settlement

    OAKLAND, Calif. — College athletes who have accused the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and five conferences of violating the Sherman Act by restricting compensation for the commercial use of their names, images and likenesses (NIL) filed a motion July 26 in a federal court in California for preliminary approval of a $2,576,000,000 settlement, which the players say will “reshape the economic landscape of college sports.”

  • July 26, 2024

    Judge Refuses To Toss Dispute Between Disney And Actor Over Social Media Posts

    LOS ANGELES — A California federal court judge denied Disney’s motion to dismiss a wrongful discharge case filed by an actor who was fired from the Disney+ show The Mandalorian purportedly due to the posts she made on social media platforms, including X, formerly known as Twitter, and Instagram, finding that Disney failed to show that it engaged in expressive association that is protected under the First Amendment.

  • July 26, 2024

    In 1st Impression Case, Panel Says Snapchat, Meta Must Provide Subpoenaed Info

    SAN DIEGO — In a case of first impression, a California appellate court granted petitions for writs of mandate, ruling that the Stored Communications Act’s (SCA) disclosure limitations are inapplicable to bar compliance with subpoenas requesting access to social media posts made by a murder victim on Facebook and Snapchat because the platforms’ decisions to access their “users’ communications” puts them outside the SCA’s disclosure limitations.

  • July 25, 2024

    Hospice Files Defamation Suit Against Anonymous Google Reviewers

    LOS ANGELES — Alleging that it is being targeted by a business competitor who has “coordinated” the posting of “fake” negative reviews online, a hospice filed a lawsuit in California state court asserting claims against 1,000 John Does who posted the negative reviews for defamation and violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL).

  • July 23, 2024

    Magistrate Grants Adult Video Company’s Bid To Serve ISP In Illegal Download Row

    ORLANDO, Fla. — A Florida federal magistrate judge on July 22 granted in part a motion filed by an adult video company to serve the internet service provider (ISP) of an unknown defendant accused of copyright infringement related to alleged illegal downloading and distributing of the video company’s content, finding that because serving the ISP is necessary for the company to proceed in this case, the company may serve the ISP with specified protections regarding identifying information.

  • July 22, 2024

    9th Circuit Hears Arguments On X Corp.’s Appeal As To Social Media Moderating Bill

    SAN FRANCISCO — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in an appeal by X Corp., formerly known as Twitter Inc., of a district court order denying its request for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the enforcement of California legislation requiring social media companies to post their terms of service reports twice a year, which X Corp. argues violates its free speech rights.

  • July 18, 2024

    Panel Remands For Discovery Cost Calculations In Dispute Between Gamer And Twitch

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California appellate court on July 17 reversed a lower court’s order denying an online gamer’s motion to tax or strike Twitch Interactive’s electronic discovery costs in the gamer’s breach of contract suit against Twitch for suspending his Twitch account, finding that remand is required for a correct determination of Twitch’s discovery costs.

  • July 17, 2024

    Federal Judge: Trademark Claims Over Social Media Giant’s Use Of ‘X’ Can Continue

    ORLANDO, Fla. — A federal judge in Florida largely denied a motion to dismiss from the company formerly known as Twitter Inc., finding that a much smaller social media advertising company adequately supported its claims that the social media giant infringed on its “X SOCIALMEDIA” trademark when it rebranded to X Corp. after being purchased by Elon Musk.

  • July 17, 2024

    Judge Won’t Freeze Assets Of Electronics Company Accused Of Faking Online Reviews

    SAN JOSE, Calif. — A California federal judge on July 16 denied a consumer’s motion for a preliminary injunction freezing more than $5 million of a Chinese manufacturer-owned company’s assets pending the outcome of his lawsuit accusing it of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other statutes for allegedly faking reviews on Amazon.com to sell shoddy electronics, finding insufficient evidence of damages.

  • July 17, 2024

    Rehearing Granted In GoDaddy TCPA Suit, Class Settlement Opinion Clarified

    ATLANTA — An 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on July 16 granted a petition for panel rehearing filed after a May opinion vacated a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) class settlement with GoDaddy.com LLC and issued an opinion substituting its previous opinion with one that was “the same as our previous except that we clarify that the opinion of this Court is delivered solely in Section III.C.iii, in which” the entire panel joined; the class’ rehearing petition sought clarification for “the basis of” the May decision, arguing that the opinion titled “Opinion of the Court” was not actually that.

  • July 15, 2024

    Connecticut Court Hears Arguments On CDA Immunity In Snapchat Assault Suit

    WATERBURY, Conn. — Snap Inc., which operates the Snapchat social network, squared off in Connecticut court against the parents of a minor who was sexually assaulted by two men that she met through the platform, with the social media company asserting that it is immune from liability for the rapists’ actions under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA).

  • July 12, 2024

    DMCA Claims In GitHub AI License Dispute Dismissed For 3rd, Final Time

    OAKLAND, Calif. — John Doe defendants suing GitHub Inc. and others for a purported lack of attribution of their shared materials in artificial intelligence (AI) products saw their claims under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) dismissed for a third time, this time with prejudice.