Mealey's Disability Insurance
-
December 08, 2023
Louisiana Federal Judge Remands Disability Claimant’s Suit Seeking LTD Benefits
LAFAYETTE, La. — A Louisiana federal judge adopted a magistrate judge’s recommendation to remand a disability claimant’s suit, agreeing with the magistrate judge’s conclusion that remand is warranted because the federal jurisdictional amount in controversy requirement of $75,000 is not met.
-
December 08, 2023
Limitation In Disability Income Policy Is Ambiguous, Claimant Tells 9th Circuit
SAN FRANCISCO — A district court erred in finding that a disability income insurer correctly reduced the claimant’s disability income benefits according to the terms of the disability income policy because the policy’s monthly benefit limitation is ambiguous and, therefore, must be construed in favor of the claimant, a disability claimant says in an appellant brief filed in the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeal.
-
December 08, 2023
Judge Dismisses Suit After Flight Attendant, Disability Insurer Settle LTD Claim
SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge dismissed a disability benefits suit after the parties settled the dispute over a flight attendant’s entitlement to long-term disability (LTD) benefits.
-
December 07, 2023
Disability Claimant’s Suit Administratively Closed Until Insurer Decides Appeal
DENVER — A Colorado federal judge adopted a magistrate judge’s recommendation to administratively close a disability claimant’s suit seeking a declaration that long-term disability (LTD) benefits are owed under a disability plan to allow the disability insurer to issue a decision on the claimant’s appeal.
-
December 07, 2023
Judgment Entered For Disability Claimant; Own-Occupation Benefits Owed
SANTA ANA, Calif. — A California federal judge issued a judgment in favor of a disability claimant after determining that the claimant is owed long-term disability (LTD) benefits because the claimant met his burden that he remains disabled from performing the duties of his own occupation.
-
December 07, 2023
Termination Of LTD Benefits Was Not Abuse Of Discretion, Magistrate Judge Says
PITTSBURGH — A disability plan’s termination of long-term disability (LTD) benefits was not an abuse of discretion because the evidence shows that the claimant was not disabled from performing the duties of any occupation as required by the plan, a Pennsylvania federal magistrate judge said in recommending that the plan’s motion for summary judgment be granted and the claimant’s motion for summary judgment be denied.
-
December 07, 2023
Disability Claimant Files Notice Of Appeal In Dispute Over ‘Any Occupation’ Benefits
DENVER — A disability claimant filed a notice of appeal to the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal after a Colorado federal judge ruled that the disability insurer’s termination of the claimant’s disability benefits was reasonable because the insurer fully investigated the claim before concluding that the claimant was not disabled from performing the duties of any occupation.
-
December 07, 2023
Disability Claimant Seeks High Court Review On Claims Procedure Regulations
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A disability claimant urges the U.S. Supreme Court to grant a petition for writ of certiorari to review whether the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals properly determined whether violations of claims procedure regulations under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act can be excused if the disability plan claims administrator substantially complied with the regulations.
-
December 07, 2023
Disability Plan Did Not Abuse Discretion In Terminating LTD Benefits, Judge Says
MINNEAPOLIS — A disability plan did not abuse its discretion in terminating a claimant’s long-term disability (LTD) benefits after four years of paying the claimant benefits because substantial evidence, including a statement from the claimant’s treating doctor that he was able to return to work, supports the plan’s decision, a federal judge in Minnesota said.
-
November 20, 2023
9th Circuit Finds No Error In Judgment Entered In Favor Of Disability Insurer
SAN JOSE, Calif. — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a district court’s judgment in favor of a disability insurer, rejecting the disability claimant’s argument that the lower court adopted new rationales that were not included in the administrative record in finding that the insurer’s termination of benefits was reasonable based on the evidence.
-
November 14, 2023
Disability Claimant’s Suit Cannot Proceed; Panel Says Claims Are Time-Barred
NEW ORLEANS — A district court properly found that a disability claimant’s suit cannot proceed because the claims alleged against the disability insurer are barred by the applicable statutes of limitations, the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said in affirming the lower court’s ruling.
-
November 10, 2023
Alabama Federal Judge Refuses To Deviate From Precedent In Disability Suit
JASPER, Ala. — An Alabama federal judge denied motions to determine the appropriate standard of review in a disability benefits dispute filed by the disability insurer and disability claimant after determining that neither of the parties persuaded the court to deviate from the precedent set forth in an 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ suit when determining the appropriate standard of review.
-
November 09, 2023
Panel Affirms Disability Insurer’s Benefits Termination Was Arbitrary, Capricious
PHILADELPHIA — The Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Nov. 8 affirmed a district court’s ruling that a disability insurer acted arbitrarily and capriciously in terminating a disability claimant’s benefits because the insurer wrongfully reclassified the claimant’s occupation as an internal medical specialist after more than 10 years of correctly classifying the claimant’s occupation as a gastroenterologist.
-
November 09, 2023
Federal Magistrate Judge Strikes Filings Submitted By Disability Claimant
PORTLAND, Maine — A federal magistrate judge in Maine on Nov. 8 granted a disability insurer’s motion to strike two filings submitted by a disability claimant because the claimant did not seek leave of the court before submitting the filings, which were not permitted pursuant to the court’s scheduling order.
-
November 10, 2023
Panel Refuses To Review District Court Decision In Disability Benefits Dispute
PHILADELPHIA — While acknowledging that a district court’s appointment of an independent medical expert to examine a disability claimant suffering from fibromyalgia and rheumatoid arthritis is “highly unusual,” the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals refused to grant a disability insurer’s petition for a writ of mandamus because the district court indicated that the purpose of the appointment is to reinforce the district court’s belief that remand of the claim is the appropriate form of relief.
-
November 10, 2023
Airline Pilot Files Complaint Seeking Disability Benefits For Long-Haul COVID-19
PHILADELPHIA — A disability insurer abused its discretion and breached its duty to a commercial airline pilot suffering from the effects of long-haul COVID-19 when it denied the pilot’s claim for long-term disability (LTD) benefits, the pilot claims in a complaint filed in Pennsylvania federal court.
-
November 09, 2023
Insured’s Disability Income Suit Barred By Policy’s Suit Limitations Provision
ATLANTA — A suit against a disability income insurer is barred by the policy’s three-year suit limitations provision because the insured failed to file the breach of contract and bad faith suit within three years of his claim for benefits being denied, the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said in affirming a district court’s ruling.
-
November 09, 2023
Bad Faith Claim In Disability Suit Cannot Proceed, Judge Says
SAN DIEGO — A bad faith claim alleged against a disability insurer cannot proceed because the insured failed to show that the insurer acted unreasonably and because the insurer showed that a genuine issue of fact existed on the cause of the insured’s disability, a California federal judge said in partly granting the disability insurer’s motion for summary judgment.
-
November 08, 2023
Parties In Disability Suit Allowed To File Administrative Record Under Seal
CINCINNATI — An Ohio federal judge granted a joint motion to seal the administrative record in a disability benefits suit after determining that the protection of the disability claimant’s private health information outweighs the public’s interest in having access to the records and documents in the administrative record.
-
November 08, 2023
Magistrate Judge Recommends Disability Insurer’s Motion For Judgment Be Granted
CHATTANOOGA, Tenn. — A disability insurer’s termination of a claimant’s long-term disability (LTD) benefits was not arbitrary and capricious because the medical evidence supported the insurer’s termination of benefits and the insurer “provided a reasoned basis” for its termination, a Tennessee federal magistrate judge said in recommending that the insurer’s motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) be granted and the claimant’s motion for JMOL be denied.
-
November 08, 2023
Disability Claimant Awarded $42K In Attorney Fees After 9th Circuit’s Remand
SEATTLE — A Washington federal judge determined that a disability claimant is entitled to $42,000 in attorney fees based on the fact that she achieved some success on the merits in her long-term disability (LTD) benefits suit, which was remanded by the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.
-
November 07, 2023
Disability Insurer’s Benefits Termination Was Not Arbitrary, Capricious, Judge Says
CHATTANOOGA, Tenn. — A disability claimant failed to show that a disability insurer’s reliance on the opinions of its staff physicians was arbitrary and capricious or that the insurer’s conflict of interest affected its decision to terminate the claimant’s benefits, a Tennessee federal judge said Nov. 6 in adopting a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation to grant the insurer’s motion for judgment on the administrative record.
-
October 18, 2023
Former NBA Player Alleges Disability Insurer Breached Contract, Acted In Bad Faith
CHARLOTTE, N.C. — A former National Basketball Association (NBA) player alleges in a complaint filed in North Carolina federal court that his disability insurer acted in bad faith and breached its contract by denying his disability benefits claim because he was rendered totally and permanently disabled by a diagnosis of myopericarditis, an inflammation of the lining of his heart, following two bouts with COVID-19.
-
October 10, 2023
5th Circuit Says Former NFL Player Not Entitled To Additional Disability Benefits
NEW ORLEANS — Even though the denial of a claim for additional disability benefits under the National Football League (NFL) plan seems “disturbing,” the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said reversal of a district court’s ruling in favor of an ex-NFL player must be reversed because the former player failed to show that he had any changed circumstances that would entitle him to additional disability benefits under the plan.
-
October 06, 2023
1st Circuit Panel Says Termination Of Disability Pension Benefits Was Reasonable
BOSTON — The First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a district court’s finding that the termination of disability pension benefits was reasonable because the pension plan made numerous attempts to verify the claimant’s contention that he did not engage in disqualifying employment while receiving the benefits.