Mealey's Franchise

  • November 06, 2023

    Cleaning Franchisees Seek Preliminary Approval Of $30M Classification Settlement

    SAN FRANCISCO — Cleaning service franchisees who allege that they have been misclassified filed a motion in a federal court in California seeking preliminary approval of a class settlement under which Jan-Pro Franchising International Inc. will pay $30 million and make changes to its business practices that the plaintiffs state will benefit California franchisees.

  • October 31, 2023

    Domino’s Seeks U.S. High Court Ruling On Local Delivery Drivers And FAA

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Domino’s Pizza LLC truck drivers (D&S drivers), found by the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals to be exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) in their class case alleging unreimbursed business expenses and violation of California’s unfair competition law, filed in the U.S. Supreme Court a waiver of their right to respond to Domino’s petition for writ of certiorari in which the pizza franchise argues that circuits are split on whether local delivery drivers are engaged in interstate commerce.

  • October 23, 2023

    Housekeeper Files Class Suit Against DoubleTree Under Los Angeles 2022 Ordinance

    LOS ANGELES — A hotel housekeeper filed a class complaint in a California court accusing her employer of violating the Los Angeles Hotel Worker Protection Ordinance; her attorneys say it’s the first case to be filed under the 2022 ordinance intended to protect hotel workers from sexual assault.

  • October 16, 2023

    Judge Dismisses State Claims Ahead Of Trial In Real Estate Commission Class Case

    KANSAS CITY, Mo. — A federal judge in Missouri on Oct. 13 dismissed two state law claims in a class case by home sellers who accuse the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and real estate franchisors of antitrust violations when it comes to commissions, leaving for trial only the claim alleging violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act.

  • October 12, 2023

    SBA Argues It Can Deny PPP Loan Forgiveness If Borrower Was Never Eligible For Loan

    AMARILLO, Texas — In an action brought by a truck dealer against the federal government challenging the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) determination that the dealer was not initially eligible for a Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan and thus ineligible for loan forgiveness, the federal government defendants cross-moved for summary judgment while at the same filing their response to the dealer’s prior motion for summary judgment.

  • September 28, 2023

    Trial Pushed To January After Settlement Notice Filed In Classification Case

    SAN FRANCISCO — In a Sept. 27 docket entry following a status conference, the October 2023 trial date in a cleaning service franchisee classification class dispute was vacated with a note that it will be reset in January 2024 after the franchisor filed a notice that the parties reached a settlement agreement that will provide up to $30 million.

  • September 26, 2023

    Hearing Scheduled After Settlement Notice Filed In Franchisor Classification Case

    SAN FRANCISCO — A hearing was scheduled for Sept. 27 in a cleaning service franchisee classification class dispute after the franchisor filed a notice that the parties reached a settlement agreement that will provide up to $30 million; the federal judge in California stated in the order that the status of the settlement and whether to vacate the October trial date will be considered at the hearing.

  • September 21, 2023

    Taco Bell Worker Settles Biometric Data Case After Arbitration Order

    EAST ST. LOUIS, Ill. — A Taco Bell employee who alleged in a putative class complaint that workers’ biometric data is collected, used and stored in violation of state law dismissed the case with prejudice on Sept. 20 in a federal court in Illinois after filing a notice of settlement.

  • September 20, 2023

    Federal Judge Seeks Amended Class Settlement Motion In Papa John’s No-Poach Case

    LOUISVILLE, Ky. — A federal judge in Kentucky denied preliminary approval of a $5 million class settlement proposed in a case accusing a pizza chain franchisor of violating the Sherman Act by coordinating no-poach agreements between its franchisees, finding that insufficient information was supplied regarding adequacy, typicality and predominance.

  • September 19, 2023

    RE/MAX Agrees To Settle Real Estate Commission Antitrust Class Claims For $55M

    CHICAGO — Home sellers and RE/MAX LLC filed a notice of pending settlement and joint motion stay an antitrust case as to RE/MAX on Sept. 18 in a federal court in Illinois; on the same day, RE/MAX filed a Form 8-K with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission stating that it agreed to pay a total settlement amount of $55 million.

  • September 06, 2023

    1st Circuit Sends 2nd Question To Mass. High Court In 7-Eleven Franchisee Case

    BOSTON — A First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel certified a second question to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) in a case that has been litigated for nearly six years by 7-Eleven franchisees challenging their classification as independent contractors.

  • August 30, 2023

    Franchisor Seeks Emergency Stay While Appealing Ruling In Classification Class Case

    SAN FRANCISCO — A cleaning service franchisor filed an emergency motion in the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals seeking to completely stay proceedings in the trial court while it appeals denial of its motion to compel to arbitration absent class members in a misclassification case; the motion was filed one day after the trial court issued an order clarifying that the trial scheduled to commence Oct. 16 “will proceed as to all class members except the 125 and will include even the 125 if our court of appeals rules in time.”

  • August 28, 2023

    Class Claims Over Size Of Burger King’s Burgers Partially Dismissed

    MIAMI — A putative class complaint accusing Burger King Corp. of overstating the size of its Whoppers and other beef patties in advertisements was partly dismissed by a federal judge in Florida who found in part that the plaintiffs’ allegations that consumer protection laws in all 50 states and the District of Columbia were violated failed to sufficiently support each cause of action, and a nationwide Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA) claim appeared only in their response and not in their amended complaint.

  • August 15, 2023

    Voluntary Dismissal Of Sandwich Class Suit Granted; Subway Denied Sanctions

    OAKLAND, Calif. — A federal judge in California granted a consumer’s motion, citing her pregnancy, to voluntarily dismiss her putative class complaint accusing a sandwich franchisor of deceptively labeling its tuna salad, sandwiches and wraps and denied the franchisor’s motion for sanctions in the amount of its attorney fees and costs, finding that it failed to show that they would be appropriate.

  • August 10, 2023

    JMOL Entered For Jack In The Box On Unpaid Meal Break Claim

    PORTLAND, Ore. — A federal judge in Oregon entered judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) for Jack in the Box Inc. on meal break claims and struck lost meal break wages and meal break penalty wages awarded as part of an October 2022 verdict to a class of workers bringing various wage-and-hour claims, finding that before June 1, 2010, Oregon law required employees to be paid only for the time spent working when a 30-minute meal break was cut short.

  • August 08, 2023

    6th Circuit Reverses Arbitration Order In Papa John’s Driver’s Expenses Suit

    CINCINNATI — A Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel reversed a trial court’s arbitration order in a putative class and collective complaint by a pizza delivery driver alleging that he and others were denied their full vehicle-related business expenses, finding that the lower court neglected to fully explore whether the lead plaintiff himself assented to such an agreement.

  • July 26, 2023

    After Remand, 9th Circuit Affirms Arbitration Denial In Truck Driver’s Class Case

    SEATTLE — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in a case remanded by the U.S. Supreme Court found that Southwest Airlines Co. v. Saxon is not “clearly irreconcilable” with Rittman v. Amazon.com, Inc. and for the second time affirmed a trial court’s denial of arbitration in a class case by Domino’s Pizza LLC truck drivers (D&S drivers) alleging unreimbursed business expenses and violation of California’s unfair competition law.

  • July 25, 2023

    Franchise Agrees To $50,000 Payment, Providing Interpreters In EEOC Disability Suit

    FORT PIERCE, Fla. — A federal judge in Florida approved an agreement between the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and a fast-food franchise in a disability bias lawsuit under which the employer will pay $50,000 and provide American Sign Language (ASL) interpreters when requested by applicants and employees for interviews, orientations, training and performance reviews.

  • July 13, 2023

    Customer, McDonald’s: AI Voiceprint Class Lawsuit Dismissed With Prejudice

    CHICAGO — McDonald’s Corp. and a customer who alleged in a putative class lawsuit that the franchisor violates the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting voiceprints to place drive-through orders filed a stipulation of dismissal on July 12 in a federal court in Illinois.

  • July 13, 2023

    Panel:  No Employment Practices Liability Coverage Owed For Discrimination Suit

    ATLANTA — The 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on July 12 affirmed a lower federal court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of an employment practices liability insurer in a multiunit franchise insured’s breach of contract lawsuit seeing seeking coverage for an underlying discrimination and retaliation action, finding that an employee’s discrimination charge constituted a “claim” pursuant to the policy and, as result, all “claims” brought by the employee are deemed to have been made prior to the policy’s inception.

  • July 11, 2023

    Panel: Trademark Abandonment Defense Rightly Rejected By Florida Federal Judge

    ATLANTA — The 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has upheld a ruling in favor of a franchisor that alleged that a former franchisee used the “Navaka” trademark after the parties’ implied license was rescinded.

  • June 26, 2023

    Federal Judge Dismisses Dunkin’ App Pricing Class Suit On Alternative Grounds

    BOSTON — A federal judge in Massachusetts granted a motion to dismiss filed by a coffee franchisor in a putative class complaint by a Massachusetts man over pricing in the company’s mobile application but based the ruling on a lack of subject matter jurisdiction rather than the arbitration requirements asserted by the defendant.

  • June 23, 2023

    Five Guys, Franchisee’s $1.2M Wage, Hour Class Settlement Granted Final Approval

    FRESNO, Calif. — A federal judge in California on June 22 approved a $1.2 million class settlement to be paid by the operator of Five Guys restaurants and Five Guys Enterprises LLC to end a complaint by employees who alleged that they were not always permitted to take meal and rest breaks, were required to continue working after clocking out, had to use personal vehicles for work without reimbursement and were subjected to background check disclosure forms that did not comply with federal and state statutes.

  • June 20, 2023

    PPP Recipient Says SBA Exceeded Statutory Authority In Denying Loan Forgiveness

    AMARILLO, Texas — In an action brought by a truck dealer against the federal government seeking forgiveness for a Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan, the dealer moved for summary judgment, contending that the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) decision that the dealer was not initially eligible for a PPP loan and thus ineligible for loan forgiveness exceeded and was contrary to its statutory authority.

  • June 15, 2023

    Third-Party Complaint Is Filed In Suit Involving Reinsurance Commutation

    JACKSON, Miss. — Defendants in a lawsuit involving what the plaintiff alleges was “a corporate insurance and risk management program promoted, created, and put in place by Defendants for Domino’s Pizza franchisees” have filed a third-party complaint against Domino’s Pizza LLC and related entities in a Mississippi federal court.

Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Mealey's Franchise archive.