Mealey's Pollution Liability
-
May 23, 2023
Gold Miners Failed To Exhaust Remedies Before Challenging CWA Permit Denial
LAFAYETTE, La. — A group that claims to have found the largest ever gold discovery in Alaska’s Seward Peninsula failed to exhaust its administrative remedies before seeking judicial review of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ decision to deny its permit to dredge a waterway because the group filed a request for appeal with the Corps but also filed suit before the Corps reached its final decision, a Louisiana federal judge found in granting the Corps’ motion to dismiss the action.
-
May 22, 2023
Parties In Refinery Flare Dispute Jointly Seek Stay Following Mediation Session
KANSAS CITY, Kan. — The United States and the operator of an oil refinery on May 19 filed a joint motion in Kansas federal court to stay proceedings arising from the operator’s alleged exceedance of hydrogen sulfide limits at two of its flares, stating that an agreement in principle to resolve the action had been reached.
-
May 22, 2023
Property Owners’ CERCLA Claims Not Precluded By Previous Owner’s Settlement
SAN FRANCISCO — Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act claims brought by a company that purchased a polluted piece of property are not precluded by the previous owner’s settlement of CERCLA claims arising from the alleged migration of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) from its property to a neighboring one because those claims did not resolve CERCLA liability at the property at issue, a majority of a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel found in reversing and remanding a trial court order dismissing the company’s claims under res judicata.
-
May 19, 2023
In Refinery Flare Dispute, Kansas Federal Judge Says Injunctive Relief Available
KANSAS CITY, Kan. — A magistrate judge correctly permitted the United States to pursue injunctive relief against an oil refinery because the Kansas Air Quality Act (KAQA) allows such relief to be sought in federal court, a Kansas federal judge held in denying review of the magistrate judge’s order granting the United States leave to amend its complaint against the refinery, which allegedly violated terms of a consent decree by exceeding hydrogen sulfide limits at two of its flares.
-
May 17, 2023
W.Va. Federal Judge Won’t Reconsider Dismissal Of Coal Mining Pollution Claims
HUNGTINGTON, W.Va. — In denying a motion for reconsideration, a West Virginia federal judge upheld a grant of summary judgment dismissing Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and Clean Water Act (CWA) claims brought against the head of the state’s environmental protection agency for the alleged contamination of a property where coal mining previously occurred.
-
May 15, 2023
Supreme Court Declines To Assess Clean Water Act Rule That Bars Citizen Suits
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on May 15 denied a petition for writ of certiorari filed by a business that asked the high court to decide what test courts should apply when determining whether the diligent prosecution bar of the Clean Water Act (CWA) serves to bar citizen suits brought under the statute.
-
May 10, 2023
In Dry-Cleaning Pollution Dispute, Calif. Judge Refuses To Bar Punitive Damages
SAN FRANCISCO — Finding that the motion was procedurally deficient and that two chemical companies failed to meet their burdens on the merits for direct estoppel, a California judge denied the companies’ motion for summary adjudication on a punitive damages claim brought by the city of Modesto and some of its municipal agencies over perchloroethylene (PCE) contamination at former dry-cleaning sites around the city.
-
May 09, 2023
Metal Plating Company Ordered To Pay Calif. Agency’s Response Costs Under CERCLA
SAN FRANCISCO — A metal plating company that was found in contempt of court for failing to cooperate with discovery was ordered by a California federal judge to pay response costs incurred by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control for the cleanup of hazardous substances at a site where the company performed metal plating services.
-
May 09, 2023
Ill. Federal Judge Maintains Majority Of Claims In PCB Case Against Manufacturers
CHICAGO — In partly granting a motion to dismiss filed by three chemical manufacturers, an Illinois federal judge dismissed only two of the dozen claims brought by Illinois against the manufacturers for contamination of the state’s waterways and other natural resources, which was allegedly caused by the manufacturers’ production and sale of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in the state.
-
May 09, 2023
Texas Supreme Court: Car Makers Who Faked Emissions Can Be Sued In State Court
AUSTIN, Texas — The majority of the Texas Supreme Court held that Texas trial courts have personal jurisdiction to hear civil actions to enforce environmental laws against Volkswagen and Audi, which intentionally evaded compliance with federal emissions standards by installing illegal software into their vehicles, because the manufacturers completely controlled a fake recall process used as a pretense to install the software in vehicles that were already in Texas.
-
May 08, 2023
California Panel: No Official State Involvement In Demolition Of Nuclear Site
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Boeing’s planned demolition of a former nuclear and rocket research site is not covered by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because the demolition is a private action and the involvement of state agencies did not rise to such a level to bring the project under the statute, a California panel held in affirming trial court’s denial of a citizen group’s petition for writ of mandate.
-
May 08, 2023
Texas Supreme Court Rejects Farmers’ Bid For Rehearing In Pesticide Case
AUSTIN, Texas — The Texas Supreme Court on May 5 stood by its recent holding in favor of a chemical company accused of negligence, rejecting a motion for rehearing by farmers who say their cotton crops were damaged by a drifting mesquite herbicide.
-
May 05, 2023
Review Of EPA’s Denial Of State Air Quality Plans To Remain In 5th Circuit
NEW ORLEANS — The majority of a Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel refused to transfer judicial review of a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency final rule that says multiple state implementation plans (SIPs) failed to comply with the 2015 eight-hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), to the District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals because the SIPs were locally or regionally applicable.
-
May 05, 2023
California Statute Bars Pollution Claims Against Dissolved Company’s Shareholders
LOS ANGELES — A company that sought to recover response costs for the cleanup of a polluted property under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and California state law cannot recover from shareholders of a dissolved company because the state law that authorizes lawsuits against such shareholders contains a four-year statute of repose, a California federal judge held in granting dismissal of the claims against the shareholders.
-
May 05, 2023
Pennsylvania Federal Judge: Transporting Mercury Is Not An Ultrahazardous Activity
PITTSBURGH — A recycling company is entitled to dismissal of a common-law strict liability claim arising from spilled liquid mercury because the transportation of mercury is not an ultrahazardous activity that supports the claim, a Pennsylvania federal judge held in partially granting the recycling company’s motion to dismiss the claims brought by a transportation company that contracted to move the mercury.
-
May 04, 2023
Colorado Federal Judge Says CERCLA Claims For Mine Cleanup Costs Are Time-Barred
DENVER — Whether the cleanup of a former mining site is characterized as a removal action or remedial action, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act’s statute of limitations bars contribution claims brought by the owner of a former mine site against a smelting company whose predecessors contributed to the pollution of the site, a Colorado federal judge held in partially granting the smelting company’s motion for summary judgment.
-
May 01, 2023
Government Isn’t Immune From CERCLA Interest Payments, Claims Court Judge Finds
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Four oil companies seeking cleanup costs incurred at a site where they manufactured aviation gasoline (avgas) pursuant to contracts signed with the United States during World War II are entitled to Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) interest payments arising from the contracts because the agreements contained provisions in which the United States waived its sovereign immunity, a Court of Federal Claims judge held in granting the companies’ motion for summary judgment.
-
May 01, 2023
EPA Wins Dismissal Of Most, But Not All, Claims In Pennsylvania CWA Litigation
PHILADELPHIA — Allegations by a Pennsylvania borough that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s denial of its request for reconsideration of a total maximum daily load calculation (TMDL) for phosphorous levels in an impaired watershed was arbitrary and capricious will proceed, for now, a federal judge there has ruled.
-
April 27, 2023
Wash. Federal Judge: Contract Clause Doesn’t Bar Saturn V Rocket Cleanup Claims
SEATTLE — A hold-harmless provision within a contract between an aviation company that worked on the Saturn V Rocket program and NASA does not bar the United States’ Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act claims brought against Boeing, which took on the contractor’s liabilities, for environmental cleanup of a site where testing of the rocket occurred, a Washington federal judge found in denying Boeing’s motion to dismiss the complaint in its entirety.
-
April 27, 2023
Injunction Denied In New Jersey CWA Case Over Drip Irrigation
CAMDEN, N.J. — A lawsuit against a New Jersey town over alleged overuse of a drip irrigation system, which has resulted in discharges of treated liquid waste onto nearby properties, will proceed without a preliminary injunction in place, a federal judge ruled.
-
April 25, 2023
Supreme Court Won’t Decide Whether Climate Change Claims Should Be Remanded
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on April 24 denied five petitions brought by oil companies seeking to prevent the remand to state court of claims brought by various state and local governments alleging that the companies contributed to global climate change.
-
April 24, 2023
5th Circuit Refuses To Let Environmental Groups Intervene In Air Quality Row
NEW ORLEANS — Three environmental groups cannot intervene in a judicial review of a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency final rule that says multiple states have inadequate state implementation plans (SIPs) to comply with the 2015 eight-hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) because the groups have the same objective as the EPA and failed to show inadequate representation, a Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel held in denying the groups’ motion to intervene.
-
April 24, 2023
Pa. High Court: Property Owners Are Eligible For Cost Of Remediating Fuel Release
HARRISBURG, Pa. — A plain reading of the Storage Tank and Spill Prevention Act (STSPA) does not show that two property owners were required to pay registration fees before discovering a diesel fuel release from a storage tank to be eligible for reimbursement of the costs they incurred in removing five tanks and contaminated soil from their property, the majority of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court found in affirming a lower court’s decision.
-
April 24, 2023
Panel Agrees: Case Against Ford Over Fuel Economy Data Is Preempted
CINCINNATI — The Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on April 21 affirmed a determination by a Michigan federal judge that state law claims of breach of contract and fraud leveled against Ford Motor Co. in connection with false fuel economy data are preempted by federal law.
-
April 20, 2023
Calif. Federal Judge Enters Judgment On Liability In Dry-Cleaning Pollution Case
SANTA ANA, Calif. — Following a bench trial on liability, a California federal judge filed an entry of judgment against a financial group, stating that the group is liable under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and California’s Hazardous Substances Account Act (HSAA) for response costs incurred by a California state agency in remediating a site that was previously occupied by a dry-cleaning business and is now owned by the group.