Mealey's Pollution Liability

  • February 16, 2024

    Judge Won’t Reconsider Defeat Device Ruling In Light Of Settlement Termination

    BAY CITY, Mich. — Owners of diesel Chevrolet vehicles that were allegedly installed with devices designed to defeat Environmental Protection Agency emissions testing are not entitled to reconsideration of an order dismissing their claims in light of a defendant’s termination of the settlement agreement covering the claims because there was no pending motion for preliminary approval of the agreement, a Michigan federal judge ruled in denying the owners’ motion for reconsideration.

  • February 16, 2024

    Dispute Over Applicability Of Pollution Exclusion Transferred To D.C. Federal Court

    SANTA ANA, Calif. — A suit filed by insurers seeking a declaration that their policies’ pollution exclusion bars coverage for an underlying class action alleging that an insured restaurant’s grain and salad bowls contain harmful levels of fluorine and biocides will be transferred to District of Columbia federal court because the insurance contracts were signed in the District of Columbia and the majority of the witnesses are located in the District of Columbia, a California federal judge said in granting the insured’s motion to transfer the suit.

  • February 16, 2024

    Citing 2nd Circuit Case, Federal Judge Remands Vermont’s Climate Change Claims

    BURLINGTON, Vt. — Relying heavily on a recent Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ decision covering similar claims, a Vermont federal judge remanded climate change claims brought by Vermont against several oil and gas companies because the state did not assert any claims that raised questions of federal law.

  • February 16, 2024

    United States And Apache Corp. File Consent Decree Resolving Alleged CAA Violations

    ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — In a consent decree filed the same day as a complaint, Apache Corp. agreed to pay a $4 million civil penalty to resolve Clean Air Act (CAA) violation claims brought against it by the United States arising from the company’s fracking operations in New Mexico and Texas.

  • February 15, 2024

    Liquidation Order Leads To Permanent Stay For 1 Defendant In Coverage Row

    NEWARK, N.J. — All claims against one defendant in a suit in New Jersey federal court over environmental investigation and remediation have been permanently stayed because of a liquidation and injunction order issued by the Delaware Court of Chancery.

  • February 13, 2024

    EPA Issues New Final Rule Strengthening NAAQS For Fine Particulate Matter

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has announced a new final rule that will strengthen the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for fine particulate matter that will better protect the health of the general public from the dangerous health effects of this kind of air pollution.

  • February 13, 2024

    2 Tribes File Climate Change Claims In Washington State Court

    SEATTLE — The Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe and the Makah Indian Tribe of Washington, two federally recognized Indian tribes, have filed nearly identical complaints against several of the world’s largest oil and gas companies, alleging that the companies’ efforts to mislead the public about the dangers of fossil fuel products have accelerated the harmful effects of climate change, which have in turn damaged the tribes’ people and land.

  • February 12, 2024

    Insureds File Suit, Seek Coverage For Costs Incurred To Remediate Riverbank

    SAN FRANCISCO — Insureds filed suit against their umbrella liability insurer in California federal court, alleging that the insurer breached its contract and acted in bad faith by relying on the policy’s pollution exclusion to deny coverage for costs incurred in remediating a riverbank.

  • February 09, 2024

    EPA Proposes Listing 9 PFAS As Hazardous Substances Under RCRA

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a proposed rule published in the Federal Register on Feb. 8, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency suggests amending its regulations under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) to include nine specific per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) as hazardous waste for the purposes of the law. 

  • February 07, 2024

    2nd Circuit: Prior Settlement Did Not Resolve All Liability Under CERCLA

    NEW YORK — A 2011 settlement agreement did not entirely resolve Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act claims arising from the cleanup of a former manufacturing plant in the Onondaga Lake region of upstate New York because certain areas of the contaminated land were not specifically listed in the settlement agreement, a Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel found in reversing a trial court’s decision to dismiss the CERCLA claims brought by an environmental response trust against 39 manufacturers that allegedly contaminated the area.

  • February 07, 2024

    Washington Federal Judge: Cultural Resource Damages Not Available Under CERCLA

    SPOKANE, Wash. — The Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation are not entitled to cultural resource damages arising from a smelter’s alleged disposal of millions of tons of toxic slag and liquid effluent into the Columbia River because such damages are not available under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, a Washington federal judge found in granting the smelter’s motion for partial summary judgment on Feb. 6.

  • February 07, 2024

    In Gold King Mine Case, Contractor Is Granted Summary Judgment On Negligence Claims

    ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — A government contractor is entitled to summary judgment on claims of negligence and gross negligence brought against it for its involvement in the Gold King Mine release, which damaged waterways and land in several states, because the contractor owed no duty to New Mexico, the Navajo Nation or citizen plaintiffs under theories of misfeasance or nonfeasance, a New Mexico federal judge found in granting the contractor’s motion for partial summary judgment.

  • February 06, 2024

    Coverage Owed For Some Fuel Spill Cleanup Based On Pollution Exclusion Wording

    LAS VEGAS — An excess insurer owes coverage for fuel oil that spilled from a tractor because the excess policy’s pollution exclusion did not exclude coverage for cleanup costs stemming from a statutory or regulatory requirement, a Nevada federal judge said in finding that some of an insured’s cleanup costs are covered by the excess policy.

  • February 06, 2024

    Insureds Appeal Pollution Exclusion Ruling In Carbon Monoxide Coverage Suit

    BISMARCK, N.D. — Insureds filed a notice of appeal to the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, seeking review of a district judge’s finding that a pollution exclusion in their farmowners insurance policy excludes coverage for an underlying bodily injury suit arising out of carbon monoxide exposure at the insureds’ business.

  • February 05, 2024

    Washington Federal Judge Denies Monsanto’s Summary Judgment Motion In PCB Case

    SEATTLE — Monsanto Co. and several other companies are not entitled to summary judgment on claims arising from the alleged contamination of Seattle’s waterways with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) brought by the city because there are significant questions of material fact regarding causation, liability and damages, a Washington federal judge found Feb. 2 in denying the companies’ motion for summary judgment.

  • February 02, 2024

    Mo. Federal Judge: State Law Claims Arising From Nuclear Incident Are Preempted

    ST. LOUIS — In light of a recent Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals opinion, a Missouri federal judge found Feb. 1 that state law claims arising from alleged property damage caused by nuclear waste at two landfills must be dismissed because they are preempted by the Price-Anderson Act (PAA).

  • February 01, 2024

    Calif. Federal Judge Grants Partial Summary Judgment In Pipeline Rupture Dispute

    LOS ANGELES — Two companies that formerly operated an oil pipeline that ruptured and contaminated residential property in Southern California are entitled to summary judgment on several claims, including breach of written easement contracts brought by the owners of property that the pipeline crosses, a California federal judge found in partly granting the companies’ motion for partial summary judgment.

  • February 01, 2024

    Consent Decree Filed To Resolve CWA Claims For Oil Spill That Damaged Indian Land

    OKLAHOMA CITY — The United States and two oil companies filed a proposed consent decree in which the companies agreed to pay $7.4 million to resolve claims under the Clean Water Act (CWA) arising from a discharge of heavy crude oil from the companies’ Osage pipeline that contaminated a creek, as well as lands owned by members of the Sac and Fox Nation.

  • January 31, 2024

    Group: EPA’s Approval Of Colorado’s Air Quality Rules Violated Federal Law

    DENVER — The Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) has filed its opening brief in the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in a direct appeal under the Clean Air Act (CAA) related to Colorado’s state implementation plan (SIP) for keeping air pollutants below the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), arguing that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency violated the law in approving the plan.  The SIP has particular application with regard to emissions associated with hydraulic fracturing activity.

  • January 31, 2024

    California Federal Judge: CAA Consent Decree Did Not Contemplate Withdrawal

    SAN FRANCISCO — Whether Colorado can legally withdraw elements of a state implementation plan (SIP) in light of a consent decree that requires the Environmental Protection Agency to approve or disapprove the SIP is an issue that cannot be decided in the action resolved by the consent decree because the document did not contemplate the issue within its terms, a California federal judge found in denying two environmental groups’ motion to enforce the decree.

  • January 31, 2024

    EPA And DOJ Enjoined From Imposing Disparate Impact Rules Against La. Agencies

    LAKE CHARLES, La. — In granting Louisiana’s motion for a preliminary injunction against the Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), a Louisiana federal judge found that the state showed that it would be irreparably harmed if the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) and Louisiana Department of Health (LDH) were required to perform disparate impact and cumulative impact analysis for environmental grant and permitting decisions.

  • January 30, 2024

    Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage For Chemical Explosion, Insurer Says

    HOUSTON — No coverage is owed to an insured for underlying lawsuits stemming from an explosion following the release of toxic chemicals at an oil refinery because the insured failed to provide timely notice of the incident and the policy’s pollution exclusion precludes coverage, an excess liability insurer says in a complaint filed in Texas federal court.

  • January 30, 2024

    In Refinery Flare Dispute, Kansas Federal Judge Signs Consent Decree

    KANSAS CITY, Kan. — A Kansas federal judge signed a consent decree that resolves claims brought by the United States and Kansas against the operator of an oil refinery for its alleged exceedance of hydrogen sulfide limits at two of its flares.

  • January 26, 2024

    11th Circuit Grants EPA’s Motion To Dismiss Petitions Challenging CAA Decision

    ATLANTA — The majority of an 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel granted the Environmental Protection Agency’s motion to dismiss a small refinery’s two petitions for review of the agency’s decision to deny the refinery exemptions to the Clean Air Act’s (CAA) renewable fuel standard (RFS) program because the refinery filed two identical petitions in the District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals that are currently pending.

  • January 24, 2024

    In CWA Dispute, California Federal Judge Awards Nearly $4M In Fees And Costs

    SANTA ANA , Calif. — Following a final judgment based on a jury verdict in which a recycling company was found to have violated the Clean Water Act (CWA) 12,541 times, a federal judge in California awarded nearly $4 million in fees and costs to the environmental group that brought the suit.

Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Mealey's Pollution Liability archive.