( January 22, 2025, 8:14 AM EST) -- SOUIX FALLS, S.D. — Denying competing summary judgment motions in a crop insurance case centered on federal regulators’ refusal to issue a noncompliance determination, a South Dakota federal judge concluded that the challenged director review determination was arbitrary and capricious because it “failed to consider an important aspect of the problem”; she therefore remanded the request for a noncompliance determination directing that “the agency must provide a reasoned basis for its determination.”...