POLICY & REGULATION
ENFORCEMENT
LITIGATION
Chemours Co. Hit With Insider Derivative Suit In Del.
By Jeff Montgomery
Attorneys for a Chemours Co. stockholder have docketed a sealed derivative suit in Delaware's Court of Chancery, seeking damages on the company's behalf from 13 current or former directors and officers, alleging breaches of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment in connection with alleged manipulation of financial disclosures.
1 document attached |
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
BANKRUPTCY
DEALS
Monthly Merger Review Snapshot
By Matthew Perlman
The Federal Trade Commission sued to block GTCR BC's planned purchase of a medical device coatings company, the Justice Department's antitrust case against Live Nation survived a dismissal bid and a New York state court found a ski mountain deal hurt competition. Here, Law360 looks at the major merger review developments from March.
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
PEOPLE
EXPERT ANALYSIS
Running A Compliant DEI Program After EEOC, DOJ Guidance
Following recent guidance from the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice that operationalized the Trump administration's focus on ending so-called illegal DEI, employers don't need to eliminate DEI programs, but they must ensure that protected characteristics are not considered in employment decisions, say attorneys at Holland & Knight.
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
LEGAL INDUSTRY
Justices Remove Bar On Venezuelan Removals
By Katie Buehler
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday ruled the Trump administration can move forward with its removal of alleged Venezuelan gang members from the United States under the Alien Enemies Act, vacating a D.C. federal judge's order that had temporarily blocked President Donald Trump's invocation of the 1798 wartime law.
Order attached |
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
Littler Wants Out Of Fired Tech Exec's Bias Suit
By Grace Elletson
Littler Mendelson has asked to be cut loose from a former tech company executive's suit claiming the firm and the business worked together to retaliate against her for complaining that her boss made bigoted comments, arguing to a New York federal court that it can't be held liable for the legal advice it provided.
2 documents attached |
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
|