TOP NEWS
7th Circ. Says It's Too Early To Mull Fired ISU Coach's Suit
By Celeste Bott
A Seventh Circuit panel says it lacks the jurisdiction to consider if a lower court rightly denied dismissal of a lawsuit brought by an ex-Illinois State University football coach who claims he was unlawfully fired for posting an "All Lives Matter" sign on his office door, because the district judge postponed a decision on the school officials' qualified immunity argument.
Opinion attached |
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
LITIGATION
Litigant Funding Co. Has No Claim To NFL Concussion Deal
By P.J. D'Annunzio
A special master overseeing the NFL's concussion settlement fund told a Pennsylvania federal court in a filing made public Friday that a company that funds litigants' healthcare expenses was correctly denied money from the fund because the rights assigned to it by former players' doctors counted as "prohibited assignments," not the liens the company claimed they were.
Letter attached |
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
NATIVE AMERICAN
Feds Say Tribes Can't Block New Oregon Casino
By Ali Sullivan
The federal government and an Oregon Native American tribe are pushing back on a bid from three other tribes to block the operation of a new casino in Oregon, telling the D.C. Circuit that the tribes filed their emergency motion improperly and are likely to lose on the merits of their case.
3 documents attached |
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
PEOPLE
LEGAL INDUSTRY
Analysis
Presidents v. Courts: Lincoln, Trump & Judicial Power Limits
By Jeff Overley
Amid fears of President Donald Trump disobeying judges with impunity, debate has focused on famous instances of officials defying the U.S. Supreme Court. But some of the clearest insights into America's handling of White House disregard for courts exist in relatively obscure cases from the Civil War era, when unprecedented presidential actions provoked extraordinary responses from the judiciary — and underscored the limits of its powers.
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
Dems Claim DOJ Atty's 'Quid Pro Quo' Violated Ethics Rules
By Dorothy Atkins
Democratic Senate Judiciary Committee senior members lodged ethics complaints against acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove, accusing the recently appointed Bove of violating ethics rules by allegedly pushing prosecutors to drop criminal bribery charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams in a "quid pro quo" deal with President Donald Trump.
2 documents attached |
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
UK Litigation Roundup: Here's What You Missed In London
By Max Austin
This past week in London has seen the billionaire Zakay brothers, founders of Topland Group, become embroiled in a legal dispute with each other, Unilever sue three major perfume companies over alleged illegal price-fixing, and the publisher of Vogue magazine file an intellectual property suit against Cornucopia Events. Here, Law360 looks at these and other new claims in the U.K.
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
Law360's Legal Lions Of The Week
By Kevin Penton
Holwell Shuster & Goldberg LLP and Kontnik Cohen LLC lead this week's edition of Law360 Legal Lions, after the U.S. Supreme Court held that cases dismissed voluntarily can later be eligible for special judicial relief and reopening, even if a statute of limitations would typically block the lawsuit.
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
|