By Peter Sankoff and Steven Penney ( March 27, 2025, 1:40 PM EDT) -- The beauty of academic discourse is how common it is for scholars to take opposing viewpoints on issues we feel strongly about. This is particularly true in the legal academy. Professor Elaine Craig recently authored a pointed critique on Law360 Canada of the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in R. v. Reimer, [2024] O.J. No. 3819, which addressed the admissibility of “sext” message communications in the context of a sexual assault trial. Reimer was authored by Justice David Paciocco, generally regarded as the most accomplished evidence law scholar this country has ever produced....