High Court Bar's Future: McDermott's Paul Hughes

By Katie Buehler · December 18, 2024, 9:31 PM EST

Paul W. Hughes of McDermott Will & Emery LLP knows U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments are unpredictable — you can end up as the butt of a justice's joke or have...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Case Information

Case Title

Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP, Petitioner v. R. Scott Appling

Case Number

Court

Supreme Court

Nature of Suit

3422 Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158

Date Filed

April 11, 2017

Case Title

James L. Kisor, Petitioner v. Peter O'Rourke, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Case Number

Court

Supreme Court

Nature of Suit

-

Date Filed

July 02, 2018

Case Title

Leon Santos-Zacaria, aka Leon Santos-Sacarias, Petitioner v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General

Case Number

Court

Supreme Court

Nature of Suit

Date Filed

May 12, 2022

Recent Articles By Katie

March 26, 2025
Sotomayor Urges Caution On Nondelegation Doctrine Revamp
January 31, 2025
Supreme Court Eyes Its 'Next Frontier' In FCC Delegation Case
December 20, 2024
High Court Bar's Future: Williams & Connolly's Sarah Harris
December 11, 2024
High Court Bar's Future: Haynes Boone's Daniel Geyser
November 27, 2024
Up Next At The High Court: Transgender Care, Holocaust Art
November 06, 2024
An Early Look At Trump's Supreme Court Shortlist
August 28, 2024
Justices Won't Revive Student Debt Relief Plan Right Now
July 05, 2024
High Court Flexes Muscle To Limit Administrative State
June 28, 2024
In Chevron Case, Justices Trade One Unknown For Another
June 14, 2024
Blistering Dissents Belie Justices' Penchant For Consensus