Law360 Canada ( March 25, 2025, 2:20 PM EDT) -- Appeal by husband from trial judge’s rulings on retroactive child support and spousal support and division of family property; cross-appeal by wife challenging the judge’s valuation of the husband’s excluded property claim. The couple was married for 23 years and had three children. During the marriage, the husband inherited the Bellevue Property, which was renovated and sold to finance the Monck Park Property. This property was later destroyed by fire in 2018, and the insurance proceeds were held in trust at the trial. The wife, a stay-at-home spouse, supported the husband’s property development ventures, which involved his inherited property. It was argued that the judge erred in failing to recognize over $1,000,000 in family property available for division, not ordering an unequal division of family property under s. 95 of the Family Law Act (FLA), allowing the husband to exclude the entire Trust Funds from family property under s. 85 of the FLA, ordering the division of excluded property under s. 96 of the FLA, and requiring the husband to pay $10,000 in retroactive child support....