J&J Can't Boot Experts To Sink Asbestos-In-Talc MDL

By Daniel Siegal · April 27, 2020, 11:06 PM EDT

A New Jersey federal judge on Monday largely rejected Johnson & Johnson's efforts to bar plaintiffs' experts from testifying that J&J's baby powder contains asbestos and that talc can cause ovarian...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Case Information

Case Title

JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Case Number

Court

New Jersey

Nature of Suit

Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability

Date Filed

October 04, 2016

Recent Articles By Daniel

August 12, 2020
J&J Asks Mo. High Court To Overturn $2.1B Talc Ruling
July 29, 2020
J&J Can't Get Missouri Court To Reconsider $2.1B Talc Ruling
June 26, 2020
J&J Put In A Corner By Court That Slashed $4.7B Talc Verdict
June 11, 2020
No New Trial For Jockey In Career-Ending Spinal Surgery Suit
June 01, 2020
Asbestos Battles Show One Possible Fate For J&J After Talc
April 28, 2020
J&J Talc Users Get One More Shot At False Ad Class Action
April 24, 2020
J&J's Efforts To Toss $4.7B Talc Verdict Get Mixed Reception
April 21, 2020
How J&J's $4.7B Appeal Could Shape Missouri's Talc Trials
April 01, 2020
Justice Delayed: Coronavirus Halts Opioid, Cancer Trials
March 27, 2020
Pa. Doc Must Face Retrial Over Elderly Woman's Death