Dog Food Labeling Suit Sent Back To Mo. State Court

By Collin Krabbe · July 31, 2023, 10:46 PM EDT

A suit alleging that Nestle and Royal Canin have fraudulently represented certain dog foods as prescription has been sent back to Missouri state court because its unjust enrichment and antitrust claims...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Opinion

Case Information

Case Title

Anastasia Wullschleger, et al v. Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc., et al

Case Number

Court

Appellate - 8th Circuit

Nature of Suit

3410 Antitrust

Date Filed

April 18, 2022

Recent Articles By Collin

February 09, 2024
Pot Patients Say NM Insurance Case Triggers CAFA Exception
February 08, 2024
Service Failure On Expert Reports Dooms Texas Med Mal Case
February 02, 2024
Pa. Panel Ditches Med. Mal. Suit Over Tardy Expert Report
January 26, 2024
Foot Doc Can't Outrun Suit Alleging Needless, Failed Surgery
January 24, 2024
Cannabist Co. Says Suit Over $25M Deal Came Too Late
January 23, 2024
6th Circ. Rejects PREP Act Immunity For Doc In Med Mal Suit
January 16, 2024
Texas Justices Find For Doctor In Child's Snake Bite Care
January 11, 2024
Novo Nordisk Gets Ozempic Warranty Claim Tossed For Good
January 08, 2024
Patient's Prednisone Suit Against Doc, Pharmacy Can Go On
January 05, 2024
Opioid Trust Isn't For Care Claims Trader, Trustee Argues