In Re Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation MDL 2406
Case Number:
2:13-cv-20000
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Adams & Reese
- A&O Shearman
- Armbrecht Jackson
- Ausman Law Firm
- Axinn Veltrop
- Bailey & Glasser
- Bainbridge Mims
- Baker Donelson
- Baker Wotring
- Balch & Bingham
- Beasley Allen
- Beck Amsden
- Bodman PLC
- BoiesBattin
- Boies Schiller
- Bronster Fujichaku
- Brooks Pierce
- Brunini Grantham
- Burr & Forman
- Butler Prather
- Butler Snow LLP
- Cafferty Clobes
- Calcaterra Pollack
- Campbell Partners
- Carroll Warren
- Chapman Lewis & Swan
- Cohen Milstein
- Cooper & Kirk
- Cory Watson Attorneys
- Cozen O'Connor
- Cravath Swaine
- CR Legal Team
- Crowe & Dunlevy
- Crowell & Moring
- Cusimano Roberts
- Dampier Law Firm
- Dominick Feld
- Eberle Berlin Kading Turnbow & McKlveen
- Ellis Head
- Eyster Key
- Faegre Drinker
- Foley & Lardner
- Foote Mielke
- Fox Rothschild
- Gentle Turner
- Giarmarco Mullins
- Glast Phillips
- Grant & Eisenhofer
- Gray & White
- Greenberg Traurig
- Guin Stokes
- Gurley Law
- Gustafson Gluek
- Hart Law LLC
- Hausfeld LLP
- Hickey & Evans
- Hogan Lovells
- Holland & Knight
- Honigman LLP
- Horn Aylward
- Hunton Andrews
- Jinks Crow
- John D. Saxon PC
- Jones & Swartz
- Kapke Willerth
- Kilpatrick Townsend
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Kozyak Tropin
- Lane Powell
- Law Offices of Stephen M. Hansen
- Levin Papantonio
- Lightfoot Franklin
- Liskow & Lewis
- Lockridge Grindal
- Lynch Carpenter
- Mason LLP (Washington, DC)
- Maynard Nexsen
- Means Gillis
- Meierhenry Sargent
- Meshbesher & Spence
- Methvin Terrell
- Miller & Chevalier
- Mooney Green
- Morris King & Hodge
- Murray Law Firm
- NastLaw
- Nelson Mullins
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Paul Weiss
- Pendley Baudin
- Penn & Seaborn
- Phillips Lytle
- Pittman Dutton
- Pittman Firm
- Podhurst Orseck
- Pomerantz LLP
- Provosty & Gankendorff
- Quinn Connor Weaver
- Quinn Emanuel
- Redgrave LLP
- Reed Smith
- Reichard & Escalera
- Reich & Binstock
- Reinhardt Wendorf
- RichardsonClement PC
- Riley & Jackson
- Saeed & Little
- Schlichter Bogard
- Serkland Law Firm
- Shaheen & Gordon
- Shamoun & Norman
- Sharp Law LLP
- Shelby Roden LLC
- Simons & Associates Law
- Solberg Stewart
- Sommers Schwartz
- Spotswood Sansom
- Stites & Harbison
- Stone & Magnanini
- Strom Law Firm
- Taylor Porter
- The McKay Firm
- Wallace Jordan
- Whatley Kallas
- White Arnold & Dowd
- White & Case
- Whitfield Bryson
- Wiggins Childs
- Wojtalewicz Law Firm
- Wright Lindsey
- Wyatt Tarrant
- Yuhl Carr
- Zuckerman Spaeder
Companies
- BlueCross BlueShield of Arizona Inc.
- Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Inc.
- Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota
- Blue Cross of Idaho Health Service
- Blue Shield of California
- Excellus BlueCross BlueShield
- Health Care Service Corp.
- HealthNow New York Inc.
- Premera Blue Cross
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 25, 2018
BCBS Wants Instant Appeal Of Per Se Ruling In Antitrust MDL
Blue Cross Blue Shield insurers urged an Alabama federal judge on Thursday to allow for an immediate appeal of a ruling that found they have to face the strict per se standard, which presumes that an alleged plot to divvy up geographic markets by the insurance plans was unlawful.
-
May 02, 2018
BCBS Antitrust Judge Out Of Patience, But Not GIFs
An exasperated Alabama federal judge chastised the Blue Cross Blue Shield network and insurance providers over their discovery spats in antitrust litigation concerning BCBS' alleged exclusivity agreements, taking the unusual step Tuesday of voicing his frustration through an animated GIF of Tom Hanks mouthing "Really?"
-
April 16, 2018
Merger Case Can't Be Used To Rule Anthem Facts Undisputed
An Alabama federal judge on Monday found that the plaintiffs in an antitrust multidistrict litigation against Blue Cross Blue Shield can't declare facts about Blue Cross subsidiary Anthem undisputed based on the ruling that sunk last year's $54 million Cigna Corp.-Anthem merger.
-
April 06, 2018
BCBS Must Face Tough Per Se Test In Antitrust MDL
An Alabama federal judge decided Thursday that health care providers and subscribers suing Blue Cross Blue Shield insurers need only prove that the insurance plans plotted to divvy up geographic markets to succeed on those claims in antitrust multidistrict litigation, dealing a setback to the network.
-
December 07, 2017
BCBS Units Must Produce Additional Docs In Antitrust MDL
An Alabama federal judge has ordered two Georgia-based Blue Cross Blue Shield units operated by Anthem to produce missing data in multidistrict litigation alleging the health care provider fixed insurance prices, telling the provider that if it does not submit the documents, it must explain why under oath.
-
April 07, 2017
BCBS Fires Back At Reconsideration Bid In Antitrust MDL
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama fought back Thursday after subscribers suing it for price-fixing sought to undo a federal judge's ruling that trimmed their claims against the insurer, saying the subscribers were just rehashing arguments that had already been rejected in the ruling itself.
-
March 24, 2017
Subscribers Want Blue Cross Antitrust MDL Trims Rethought
Insurance subscribers in multidistrict litigation accusing Blue Cross Blue Shield of a massive price-fixing conspiracy asked an Alabama federal judge to reconsider some of his summary judgment ruling, arguing Thursday that the company's out-of-state plans don't qualify for antitrust immunity.
-
February 24, 2017
Claims Slip Through Ala. BCBS Defenses In Antitrust MDL
An Alabama federal judge on Thursday said Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama was entitled to summary judgment on some claims in multidistrict litigation alleging a vast price-fixing conspiracy among BCBS plans but said it was only partially protected by an antitrust immunity doctrine.
-
January 05, 2017
BCBS To Take Dismissal Loss In Antitrust MDL To 11th Circ.
Five Blue Cross Blue Shield plans that last month lost an attempt to escape multidistrict litigation alleging a vast price-fixing conspiracy on Wednesday asked an Alabama federal court to certify an interlocutory appeal to the Eleventh Circuit to answer questions about jurisdiction.
-
December 22, 2016
9 Blue Cross Plans Lose Bids To Escape Antitrust MDL
An Alabama federal judge on Wednesday smacked down efforts by Blue Cross Blue Shield plans to escape multidistrict litigation alleging a vast price-fixing conspiracy, finding that the insurers have sufficient business ties to the geographic area in question.