JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Case Number:
3:16-md-02738
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Multi Party Litigation:
Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Akerman LLP
- Anapol Weiss
- Ashcraft & Gerel
- Axelrod Firm
- Aylstock Witkin
- Baldante & Rubenstein
- Barker Patterson
- Barnes & Thornburg
- Baron & Budd
- Barry McTiernan
- Beasley Allen
- Belluck & Fox
- Berger Montague
- Bernheim Kelley
- Bernstein Liebhard
- Boucher LLP
- Bourdette & Partners
- Bovis Kyle
- Bruera Law Firm
- Bruster PLLC
- Burns Charest
- Cellino Law
- Chaffin Luhana LLP
- Chappell Smith
- Cheeley Law Group
- Chisholm & Chisholm
- Cohen Placitella
- Corboy & Demetrio
- Coughlin Midlige
- Craig Swapp
- Cuneo Gilbert
- DiCello Levitt
- Dolce Panepinto
- Dreesen Law Firm
- Drohan Lee
- Drummond Woodsum
- Durham Pittard
- Eichen Crutchlow
- Eisenberg Rothweiler
- Elliot Morgan Parsonage
- Faegre Drinker
- Fears Nachawati
- Ferraro Law Firm
- Fox Rothschild
- Fox Willis
- FrancoLaw PLLC
- Friedman Rubin
- Gacovino Lake
- Gainsburgh Benjamin
- George & Farinas
- Girardi & Keese
- Gitlin Horn
- Goldberg Persky
- Goldenberg Heller
- Golomb Spirt
- Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani
- Goss Law Firm PC
- Grant & Eisenhofer
- Grossman & Moore
- Guerra LLP
- Habush Habush
- Hach Rose Schirripa
- Hardin Kundla
- Hart McLaughlin
- Heard Merman
- Heninger Garrison
- Huber Thomas
- Hutton & Hutton Law Firm
- Javerbaum Wurgaft
- Jazlowiecki & Jazlowiecki
- Kanner & Whiteley
- Karon LLC
- Kelley & Ferraro
- Ketterer Browne
- Kibbey Wagner
- King & Spalding
- Klehr Harrison
- Kline & Specter
- Kopelowitz Ostrow
- Labaton Keller
- Lanier Law Firm
- Law Offices of Eric H. Weinberg
- Law Offices of James Scott Farrin
- Lenze Lawyers
- Levin Sedran
- Levy Konigsberg
- Lieff Cabraser
- Luby Law Firm
- Luff Law Firm
- Marshall Dennehey
- Matern Law Group
- McDonnell & Associates
- Merson Law
- Messa & Associates
- Meyers & Flowers
- Michael Brady Lynch Firm
- Milberg Coleman
- Montgomery McCracken
- Morelli Law Firm
- Morris Bart
- Motley Rice
- Murray Law Firm
- Nachawati Law Group
- Napoli Shkolnik
- Nass Cancelliere
- Neal & Harwell
- Parafinczuk Wolf
- Parker Waichman
- Pate Law Firm
- Peiffer Wolf
- Phillips & Paolicelli
- Potts Law Firm
- Pourciau Law
- Power Rogers
- Rahdert & Mortimer
- Reeves & Goff
- Reilly McDevitt
- Rheingold Giuffra
- Richardson Richardson Boudreaux
- Richardson Thomas
- Robins Cloud
- Robinson Calcagnie
- Ross Feller Casey
- Rourke & Blumenthal
- Saltz Mongeluzzi
- Schenck Price
- Seeger Weiss
- Shanley Law Offices
- Shook Hardy
- Singleton Schreiber
- Slater Slater
- Smith Law Attorneys
- Sullivan Papain
- Szaferman Lakind
- The Dietrich Law Firm
- The Flood Law Firm
- Trammell PC
- Umhofer Mitchell
- VSCP Law
- Walker Hamilton & Kearns
- Wallace & Graham
- Walsh Pizzi
- Waters Kraus
- Weinstein Caggiano
- Weitz & Luxenberg
- Wexler Boley
- Wilentz Goldman
Companies
- Cara Operations Ltd.
- Chevron Corp.
- Coty Inc.
- Imerys SA
- IRIS International, Inc.
- Johnson & Johnson
- Kenneth Cole Productions Inc.
- KIRA LLC
- Merial Limited
- Personal Care Products Council
- Porsche
- Rio Tinto Group
- SLM Corp.
- Walmart Inc.
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 13, 2024
'Clever' Scheme Is Concealing Talc Litigation Funding, J&J Says
The Beasley Allen Law Firm needs to disclose alleged litigation funding fueling its litigation over Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder even if that funding was not given directly to the firm since the disclosure rules apply to "parties" and not "law firms," J&J has told a New Jersey federal court.
-
August 07, 2024
Law Firms Fight J&J Bid To Revive Talc Subpoenas
The Beasley Allen Law Firm, the steering committee of talc plaintiffs suing Johnson & Johnson, and a third-party law firm urged the New Jersey federal court this week to reject a bid from the pharmaceutical company to reinstate subpoenas seeking evidence of alleged third-party litigation funding.
-
July 22, 2024
Lack Of 'Smoking Gun' Sinks J&J's Bid To DQ Beasley Allen
The Beasley Allen Law Firm may represent plaintiffs in multicounty talc injury litigation in New Jersey state court, after a judge found Johnson & Johnson failed to show a former Faegre Drinker outside counsel shared information he learned representing the company in earlier talc litigation.
-
July 11, 2024
Talc Law Firms Beat J&J Subpoenas Seeking Funding Info
The Beasley Allen Law Firm, another plaintiffs law firm and a litigation funder defeated subpoenas from Johnson & Johnson in talc litigation, with a special master reasoning that the broad swath of discovery permitted in federal courts still has limits.
-
July 02, 2024
Beasley Allen Slams J&J's DQ Bid 'Check-Up' In Talc Tort
The Beasley Allen Law Firm and Johnson & Johnson continue to spar over the firm and attorney Andy Birchfield's role in long-running federal and state mass torts over talcum powder injuries, with the firm calling out J&J on Tuesday for "prodding" the New Jersey courts to boot the lawyers from the litigation.
-
June 18, 2024
J&J Fights Law Firm's Bid To Nix Subpoenas In Talc Brawl
Information about the Beasley Allen Law Firm's litigation funding and settlement communications is relevant and necessary to resolving long-running multidistrict litigation over Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder products and so should be turned over, the pharmaceutical giant has told a New Jersey federal court.
-
June 06, 2024
Law Firm Says Axe 'Draconian' J&J Subpoena In Talc Claim
A Mississippi plaintiffs firm urged a New Jersey federal court on Thursday to quash a subpoena served by Johnson & Johnson requesting that the firm turn over documents related to litigation funding and its communication with media outlets, calling the subpoena "draconian" and improper as the firm is not a party to the pharmaceutical giant's current personal injury litigation surrounding its talcum powder products.
-
May 31, 2024
Beasley Allen Wants J&J Subpoenas Nixed Amid Ethics Fight
The Beasley Allen Law Firm and a plaintiff steering committee in the Johnson & Johnson talc litigation blasted subpoenas directed at the firm and others aimed at turning up evidence of an alleged scheme to muster opposition to J&J's latest $6.5 billion bankruptcy plan.
-
May 28, 2024
Beasley Allen, J&J Trade Barbs Over DQ Bid In Talc Litigation
Johnson & Johnson and the Beasley Allen Law Firm have accused each other by turns of "gamesmanship" and "unscrupulous conduct" in New Jersey courts in a fight over whether the firm should be disqualified from talcum powder litigation for allegedly collaborating in secret with a former J&J outside counsel.
-
May 23, 2024
J&J Loses Expedited Bid For Beasley Allen Docs In Talc MDL
Johnson & Johnson has lost its bid in New Jersey federal court to have the Beasley Allen Law Firm quickly produce documents related to what J&J said seems to be an "intentional effort" by the firm to "bias the vote" against a proposed $6.5 billion reorganization plan for its talc subsidiary.