Computer Sciences Corporation v. Tata Consultancy Services Limited et al
Case Number:
3:19-cv-00970
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions
Judge:
Firms
- Alston & Bird
- Baker Botts
- Carter Arnett
- Crowell & Moring
- Finnegan
- Henry Oddo
- Kelley Drye
- Kennedy Attorneys & Counselors at Law
- Quinn Emanuel
- Sumner Schick
- Wright Close & Barger
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 15, 2024
Baker Botts, Sumner Schick $14M Fee Hit As 'Unreasonable'
Baker Botts LLP and Sumner Schick LLP's request for $14.3 million in attorney fees plus $1.8 million in costs following their client Computer Sciences Corp.'s $168.4 million trade secrets verdict against Tata Consultancy Services is "facially unreasonable," the consulting firm told a Texas federal judge Wednesday.
-
August 14, 2024
Baker Botts, Sumner Schick Seek $14.3M In Fees For IP Win
Baker Botts LLP and Sumner Schick LLP are seeking nearly $14.3 million in attorney fees plus almost $1.8 million in costs for representing Computer Sciences Corp. in a trade secrets dispute where the IT company won $168.4 million after a Texas jury found Tata Consultancy Services willfully misappropriated CSC's proprietary information.
-
June 14, 2024
Tata Must Pay $168M For Trade Secret Theft, Texas Judge Says
A Texas federal judge has ordered Tata Consultancy to pay $168 million for willfully misappropriating an IT company's trade secrets concerning source code and life insurance software documentation, plus $25 million in prejudgment interest.
-
March 18, 2024
The Biggest Trade Secrets Awards In The Last 5 Years
Trade secrets cases are having a moment in the spotlight, thanks to some gargantuan damages awards over the past five years and more flexibility for plaintiffs to argue for what they think they are owed.
-
November 21, 2023
Tata Hit With $210M Jury Verdict In Trade Secrets Row
A Texas jury has sided with IT company Computer Sciences Corp., finding that rival Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. stole CSC's source code and documentation to use in its new insurance software and awarding a total of $210 million for the willful misappropriation of its trade secrets.