Purdue Pharma L.P.
Case Number:
7:19-bk-23649
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Firms
- Hurwitz Fine
- Teitelbaum Law Group
- Davis Polk
- Caplin & Drysdale
- Foley & Lardner
- Terrell Hogan
- Sherrard Roe
- The Cooper Law Firm
- Kobre & Kim
- Frost Brown
- Phillips Lytle
- Porzio Bromberg
- Godfrey & Kahn
- Himes Petrarca
- Lowe Stein
- Pashman Stein
- FrankGecker
- Spangenberg Shibley
- Cozen O'Connor
- Potter Anderson
- Consovoy McCarthy
- Clifford Law Offices
- Gage Spencer & Fleming
- Ballard Spahr
- Saul Ewing
- Pachulski Stang
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Gertz & Rosen
- Kramer Levin
- Andrews & Thornton
- Alston & Bird
- Cuneo Gilbert
- McElroy Deutsch
- King & Spalding
- Cleary Gottlieb
- Joseph Hage Aaronson
- Locke Lord
- Dentons
- Akin Gump
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Katsky Korins
- ASK LLP
- Lerner Arnold
- Faegre Drinker
- Lite DePalma
- Dechert LLP
- Squire Patton
- Slevin & Hart
- Mehri & Skalet
- Marino Tortorella
- McGrail & Bensinger
- Bentley & Bruning
- UB Greensfelder
- Miller Shah LLP
- Bialson Bergen
- Bielli & Klauder
- Porteous Hainkel
- Binder & Schwartz
- ArentFox Schiff LLP
- Cronin Fried
- Martin S. Rapaport
- Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP
- Schulte Roth
- Motley Rice
- Debevoise & Plimpton
- Ifrah Law
- Taft Stettinius
- Blank Rome
- Levenfeld Pearlstein
- Blitman & King
- MacElree Harvey
- Loeb & Loeb
- WilmerHale
- Porter Hedges
- Wilk Auslander
- Stutzman Bromberg
- Keller Rohrback
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
- O'Brien Belland
- Duane Morris
- Shipman & Goodwin
- Morgan Lewis
- Law Office of Nhan Nguyen
- Napoli Shkolnik
- Robins Kaplan
- Doster Ullom
- Marcus & Shapira
- Arnold & Porter
- Simmons Hanly
- Skadden Arps
- Mintz Levin
- Shafferman & Feldman
- ArentFox Schiff
- Stevens & Lee
- Hughes Socol
- BatesCarey
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Brown Rudnick
- Miller Nash LLP
- Barack Ferrazzano
- Kleinberg Kaplan
- Hagens Berman
- Reed Smith
- Brown & Connery
- Goodwin Procter
- Rothstein Mandell
- Gilbert LLP
- Carter Ledyard
- Keller Postman
- Pullman & Comley
- Shook Hardy
- Crowell & Moring
- MoloLamken
- Tarter Krinsky
- Tate Law Group LLC
- Jones Day
- Lowey Dannenberg
- Klehr Harrison
- Wachtell Lipton
- Waldrep Wall
- Seward & Kissel
- White Coleman & Associates
- Williams Mullen
- Henrichsen Law Group
- Jenner & Block
- Haug Partners
- Hobbs Straus
- Latham & Watkins
- Mayer Brown
- White & Case
- Willkie Farr
Companies
- Teamsters Local 456
- Henry Schein Inc.
- CVS Health Corp.
- ASM Capital LP
- United Parcel Service Inc.
- Sandoz International GmbH
- Kodiak Area Native Association
- The Cigna Group
- Express Scripts Holding Co.
- DuPont de Nemours Inc.
- PRA Health Sciences Inc.
- Blue Cross Blue Shield Association
- Collegium Pharmaceutical Inc.
- Hikma Pharmaceuticals PLC
- Omnicare Inc.
- Endo International PLC
- Tucson Medical Center
- Anda Inc.
- Avrio Health LP
- Hain Capital Group LLC
- Impax Laboratories, Inc.
- Houlihan Lokey Inc.
- KVK Tech Inc.
- Amneal Pharmaceuticals Inc.
- Cencora Inc.
- TR Capital Management LLC
- Ironshore Inc.
- Province LLC
- Allergan PLC
- Noramco Inc.
- Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
- Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium
- Viatris Inc.
- Purdue Pharma LP
- Walmart Inc.
- Aleutian Pribilof Islands Association Inc.
- McKesson Corp.
- Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
- Apria Healthcare Group
- United Food & Commercial Workers International Union
- Bausch Health Cos. Inc.
- Ranbaxy
- Oracle Corp.
- Johnson & Johnson
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Group
- AXA XL Ltd.
- SAP AG
- Cardinal Health Inc.
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.
- Arcadia Consumer Healthcare
- Old Republic Insurance Co.
- International Union Of Operating Engineers
- Otis Worldwide Corp.
- Loblaw Cos.
- Verita Global LLC
- Giant Eagle Inc.
- American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Organizations
- Jefferies Financial Group Inc.
- Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
Government Agencies
- Seldovia Village Tribe
- Pala Band of Mission Indians
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.
- Town of Ramapo, New York
- Tennessee Attorney General's Office
- City of Bayonne, New Jersey
- State of Nevada
- Missouri Department of Revenue
- Washington State Department of Revenue
- Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe
- Nez Perce Tribe
- Borough of Paramus, New Jersey
- Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe
- Northwestern Band of the Shoshone Nation
- Commonwealth of Massachusetts
- New York Department of Financial Services
- Town of Babylon, New York
- Town of Brookhaven, New York
- U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
- Town of Hempstead, New York
- State of Indiana
- Hopi Tribe
- St. Regis Mohawk Tribe
- Suquamish Tribe
- Ohio Attorney General's Office
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 17, 2022
Purdue Gets OK For 2-Week Opioid Suit Freeze Extension
A New York bankruptcy judge Thursday gave Purdue Pharma a two-week extension on an injunction pausing litigation against the company after being told the drugmaker is closing in on an agreement for a new Chapter 11 plan.
-
February 09, 2022
NY Judge OKs Canadian Entities' Late Purdue Ch. 11 Appeal
A New York federal judge on Wednesday approved a belated appeal filed by Canadian entities challenging Purdue Pharma's Chapter 11 plan, hours after Purdue said it had no problem with the appeal going forward before the Second Circuit.
-
February 08, 2022
Canadian Entities Seek Late Appeal In Purdue Ch. 11 Case
Canadian entities are seeking permission to file a late appeal to a New York federal court ruling that vacated Purdue Pharma's Chapter 11 plan, saying Tuesday there are unresolved issues related to their claims that won't be covered by the drugmaker's challenge in the Second Circuit.
-
February 04, 2022
Purdue Asks For New Extension On Opioid Suit Freeze
Purdue Pharma has asked a New York bankruptcy judge for another extension on the opioid litigation injunction that has been in place since it filed for bankruptcy, citing word that a settlement agreement is near on a modified reorganization plan and the considerable work that would follow.
-
February 01, 2022
Purdue Closing In On New Ch. 11 Deal With Sackler Family
A New York bankruptcy judge extended a mediation deadline Tuesday in the Chapter 11 case of Purdue Pharma after the mediator reported the parties were close to a deal that would see members of the Sackler family significantly increase their more than $4.3 billion in payments under the debtor's scuttled plan.
-
January 03, 2022
A Blockbuster Year Ahead For Health, Life Sciences Litigation
Health care and life sciences litigation is already red hot as 2022 begins and appears all but certain to intensify throughout the year as the clock ticks on time-sensitive lawsuits, the U.S. Supreme Court nears the end of its current term and opioid cases generate more trials and fresh drama. Here, Law360 explores five key litigation areas to watch.
-
December 06, 2021
Sackler Family Denies Pre-Ch. 11 Looting Of Purdue Pharma
Members of the Sackler family who own drugmaker Purdue Pharma told a New York federal judge Monday that they did not increase transfers of cash out of the business in the run-up to its 2019 Chapter 11 filing, and instead left the company with more unrestricted cash than ever before at that time.
-
November 18, 2021
Purdue Cleared To Pay Gov't Groups Over $12M In Ch. 11 Fees
A New York bankruptcy judge approved a request from drugmaker Purdue Pharma LP to reimburse more than $12 million in fees incurred by groups representing government entities in its Chapter 11 plan mediation process, saying the groups made significant contributions to the confirmed plan.
-
November 09, 2021
Purdue Agrees Not To Finalize Ch. 11 Plan Until Appeals Done
A New York bankruptcy judge said Tuesday that a stay of the implementation of Purdue Pharma's Chapter 11 plan pending appeals was unnecessary after Purdue agreed not to take the plan's final steps until after the first round of appeals are decided.
-
October 25, 2021
Purdue Opposes Requests To Delay Ch. 11 Plan For Appeals
Purdue Pharma LP is arguing that delaying the consummation of its Chapter 11 plan to allow appeals to be resolved first would needlessly delay the distribution of billions of dollars for opioid abatement efforts while there was no danger of prejudice to the appellants.