January 09, 2020
Masimo Corporation et al v. Apple Inc.
Case Number:
8:20-cv-00048
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Gibson Dunn
- Haynes Boone
- Knobbe Martens
- Lewis & Llewellyn
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- WilmerHale
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
February 03, 2025
Apple Seeks Bench Trial Win In Masimo's Trade Secret Suit
Apple Inc. urged a California federal judge Monday to issue a bench trial ruling that it didn't steal Masimo Corp.'s pulse oximetry technology for its smartwatches, arguing no actual trade secrets were at issue and that it used its own independently developed innovations to create the blockbuster product.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login