June 05, 2020
Simon and Simon, PC v. Align Technology, Inc.
Case Number:
3:20-cv-03754
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Baker Botts
- Bartlit Beck
- Berger Montague
- Buchanan Ingersoll
- Foley & Lardner
- Hagens Berman
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Manatt Phelps
- Mandel Bhandari
- Milberg Coleman
- MoginRubin
- Olson Grimsley
- Paul Hastings
- Paul Weiss
- Radice Law Firm
- Ropes & Gray
- Scheef & Stone
- Steven Williams Law
- Taus Cebulash
- Troutman Pepper
- Wilson Sonsini
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
August 07, 2024
Advocates Tell 9th Circ. To Revive Invisalign Monopoly Suit
Competition advocates are backing the revival of a class action accusing the makers of Invisalign of monopolizing the market for clear dental aligners, telling the Ninth Circuit in a new amicus brief that a district court summary judgment ruling for Align Technology creates a dangerous precedent for refusal-to-deal cases.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login