June 23, 2020
April Hughes, et al., Petitioners v. Northwestern University, et al.
Case Number:
19-1401
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Firms
- Baker Botts
- CrossCastle
- Dowd Bloch
- Goodwin Procter
- Kellogg Hansen
- Latham & Watkins
- Mayer Brown
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Ropes & Gray
- Willkie Farr
- WilmerHale
Companies
- AARP Inc.
- American Association for Justice
- American Benefits Council
- American Council on Education
- Investment Company Institute
- Service Employees International Union
- Teachers Insurance & Annuity Association of America
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
April 03, 2023
High Court ERISA Decision Buoys Excessive Fee Suits
A spate of recent decisions declining to throw out suits from workers who said their retirement plans were saddled with excessive fees show how the U.S. Supreme Court's January 2022 decision in a case against Northwestern University is reverberating in federal benefits litigation, attorneys say.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login