STATE OF COLORADO et al v. GOOGLE LLC
Case Number:
1:20-cv-03715
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Brownstein Hyatt
- Dechert LLP
- Foley & Lardner
- Larson LLP
- McCune Law
- Munger Tolles
- Orrick Herrington
- Patterson Belknap
- Riker Danzig
- Ropes & Gray
- Williams & Connolly
- Wilson Sonsini
Companies
Government Agencies
- Commonwealth of Massachusetts
- State of Maryland
- State of Nevada
- State of Tennessee
- U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 09, 2025
DOJ Fights Apple's Intervention In Google Search Remedies
The U.S. Department of Justice is opposing Apple Inc.'s "eleventh-hour effort" to have a say in what should be a proper fix for Google's search monopoly, telling a D.C. federal judge that the company has had ample opportunity to defend its lucrative revenue-sharing agreement with Google.
-
December 23, 2024
Google Counters DOJ's Proposed Chrome Sale
Google has countered the Justice Department's proposed divestiture of the Chrome browser in a brief filed in D.C. federal court arguing the proper fix for its illegal search monopoly would be to allow Android phone makers and browser companies the ability to more readily pick rival engines.
-
December 20, 2024
No, Microsoft Isn't Driving DOJ's Google Antitrust Suit: Judge
A D.C. federal judge pushed back Friday on Google's efforts to paint Microsoft as the true plaintiff in the Justice Department's search monopolization lawsuit, casting doubt during a hearing that Google should get even more information about Microsoft's relationship with ChatGPT-maker OpenAI.
-
November 26, 2024
Google Search Judge Says AI Will Affect Remedy Phase
The judge overseeing the government's search monopolization case against Google suggested Tuesday in D.C. federal court that artificial intelligence is shifting the market and will likely play a role in the remedies the court imposes on Google for allegedly violating antitrust law.
-
November 21, 2024
DOJ Search Fixes Would Remake Google, Break Off Chrome
To give rival search engines a fighting chance against Google's illegal monopoly and its massive data and structural advantages, the Justice Department asked a D.C. federal judge Wednesday for sweeping changes that would divest the Chrome browser, open up Android devices and guarantee access to underlying search data.
-
November 21, 2024
DOJ Urges Chrome, Android Sales In Google Case
The U.S. Department of Justice late Wednesday formally asked a Washington, D.C., federal judge to order a range of steps to end Google's monopolization of general search services and the text ads shown alongside search results, most notably by forcing the company to spin off the Chrome browser.
-
October 22, 2024
DOJ Wants Google's AI Search Docs, Apple Entry Thoughts
An expansive look into Google's artificial intelligence pipeline and the prospects of Apple entering into the search market are top of mind for the Justice Department as it pursues remedies meant to address the online giant's illegal monopolization of search, according to a D.C. federal court filing Monday.
-
September 06, 2024
DOJ Must Give Google 'Something Concrete' On Search Fixes
The Justice Department cannot wait until February to propose remedies meant to address Google's default contract exclusionary thumb on the scales of online search, a D.C. federal judge told the agency during a hearing Friday, adding that the government needs to put a definitive proposal on the table much sooner.
-
August 07, 2024
Google 'May Not Be So Lucky' Next Time Over Chat Deletions
Google's stunning antitrust loss in D.C. federal court Monday dealt another blow against its policies of letting internal chats delete automatically, and it came with a callout of its practice of training employees to avoid competition law "buzzwords."
-
August 06, 2024
4 Takeaways From Landmark Google Search Ruling
A landmark ruling in D.C. federal court Monday found that Google illegally maintains its search engine monopoly, and experts say the case could have broad implications for the company as well as the wider internet and shows how existing antitrust laws can apply to modern technology.