The State of Georgia et al v. Biden et al
Case Number:
1:21-cv-00163
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Government Agencies
- Alabama Department of Agriculture and Industries
- Alabama Department of Public Health
- Executive Office of the President
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- National Institutes of Health
- National Science Foundation
- U.S. Department of Commerce
- U.S. Department of Defense
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
- U.S. Department of Transportation
- U.S. General Services Administration
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 01, 2023
Georgia Drops Federal Contractor Vaccine Case Against Biden
A Georgia federal judge on Thursday has tossed Republican-controlled states' challenge to the Biden administration's COVID-19 vaccine mandate for federal contractors, just weeks after the White House eliminated the requirement.
-
December 21, 2021
Ga. Judge Pauses Fed. Contractor Vaccine Row For Appeal
A Georgia federal judge on Tuesday granted the U.S. government's request that he stay proceedings before him while it appeals his nationwide ruling barring enforcement of the COVID-19 vaccine mandate for federal contractors, and he agreed to clarify that ruling in the meantime.
-
December 07, 2021
Ga. Judge Blocks Contractor Vaccine Mandate Nationwide
A Georgia federal judge on Tuesday issued a nationwide injunction blocking the COVID-19 vaccine mandate for federal contractors from going into effect, ruling the Biden administration had likely exceeded its procurement authority.
-
December 02, 2021
Medical Association Wants States' Vax Mandate Suit Denied
The American Medical Association urged a Georgia federal court Thursday to deny a request by Georgia and six other states to block the Biden administration's COVID-19 vaccine mandate for federal contractors.
-
November 29, 2021
Feds Defend Contractor Vax Order As Setting Deal Terms
The Biden administration is fighting several states' bid to keep vaccination requirements out of future federal contracts, arguing that it is entitled to attach terms to keep the government running efficiently by reducing the number of workers who could fall sick and miss work.