February 02, 2022
SOCLEAN, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Case Number:
2:22-mc-00152
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Baker Botts
- Carole Katz LLC
- Choate Hall
- Deakle-Johnson
- Hodgson Russ
- Laredo & Smith
- Marks O'Neill
- Morgan Lewis
- Pasley Nuce
- Pendley Baudin
- Proskauer Rose
- Quinn Emanuel
- Robert Peirce & Associates
- Sharp Law LLP
- Shub & Johns
- Stevens & Lee
- Strassburger McKenna
- Sullivan & Cromwell
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
February 05, 2024
CPAP Cleaner Co. Says Philips Can't Pin Recall On It
Cleaning products designed to work with Koninklijke Philips NV's breathing machines were not the direct cause of damages the company suffered when it recalled the products, so SoClean could not be subject to false-advertising claims stemming from statements about "compatibility," it told a Pennsylvania federal court.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login