USA v. HANDY et al
Case Number:
1:22-cr-00096
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
May 31, 2024
Final Defendant Gets 2 Years In Prison For DC Clinic Blockade
An anti-abortion activist was sentenced to two years incarceration in D.C. federal court Friday, the final defendant to be sentenced among nine others charged in a 2020 blockade at a reproductive health clinic.
-
May 22, 2024
Anti-Abortion Activist Gets Two Years For DC Clinic Blockade
An anti-abortion activist convicted of invading and blockading a Washington, D.C., reproductive health clinic was sentenced to two years of incarceration Wednesday, becoming the ninth defendant to get prison time in the D.C. federal court case.
-
April 15, 2024
Feds Seek Prison For Group That Invaded Abortion Clinic
Prosecutors are seeking prison sentences for six anti-abortion activists convicted of storming a Washington, D.C., abortion clinic, including a six-year term for the alleged "criminal mastermind" behind this and other blockades.
-
November 16, 2023
9th Person Convicted For Anti-Abortion Invasion Of DC Clinic
A Massachusetts woman was convicted Thursday following a bench trial for invading a Washington, D.C., reproductive health clinic to "save lives" and body-slamming the clinic manager into a waiting room chair, becoming the ninth defendant convicted in the federal case.
-
July 24, 2023
Abortion Foes Can't Escape Charges Over Storming DC Clinic
A Washington, D.C., federal judge has refused to dismiss charges against four anti-abortion activists accused of storming an abortion clinic in the District and injuring an employee, saying the defendants' arguments against a federal law protecting abortion clinic access has no merit and that there is no legal right to "vigilantism."
-
February 09, 2023
How A Dusty Law Review Article Entered The Post-Roe Debate
A law professor who has long argued that the amendment that abolished slavery also protects abortion rights found his views spotlighted this week when a D.C. federal judge pointed to his decades-old law review article as evidence that the U.S. Supreme Court overstepped in its landmark decision overturning Roe v. Wade.