Doe v. GoodRx Holdings, Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:23-cv-00501
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Bursor & Fisher
- Cooley LLP
- Fried Frank
- Gibson Dunn
- Javitch Law Office
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Leeds Brown
- Lowey Dannenberg
- Schubert Jonckheer
- Sheppard Mullin
- Shub & Johns
- Willkie Farr
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 21, 2024
Google, Meta Want Out Of GoodRx Health Data Sharing Suit
Google, Meta Platforms and Criteo have asked a California federal court to cut them loose from litigation alleging that GoodRx improperly shared patients' protected health information with the tech companies, saying the claims are "fundamentally flawed."
-
November 03, 2023
GoodRx Threatened With Sanctions Over Settlement Notice
A California federal judge ordered GoodRx to explain why the company shouldn't be sanctioned after failing to notify the court about a related nationwide proposed class action in Florida that reached a preliminary settlement over claims the company improperly shared users' data to Meta Platforms Inc. and Google.
-
May 04, 2023
Lowey, Bursor & Fisher Want To Steer GoodRx Privacy Suits
Attorneys for GoodRx users who accused the health care platform of breaching privacy laws by sharing their sensitive health information with advertisers Google, Facebook and Criteo asked a California federal judge Wednesday to tap two firms — Lowey Dannenberg and Bursor & Fisher — to lead the charge, citing their extensive experience with privacy class actions.
-
April 28, 2023
GoodRx, Google, Meta Privacy Suits Get Consolidated In Calif.
A California federal judge on Friday consolidated proposed class actions alleging GoodRx Holdings, Google LLP, Meta Platforms Inc. and Criteo Corp. breached privacy laws by sharing users' sensitive health data with advertisers and told GoodRx the company should plan on quickly handing over documents from its recently settled Federal Trade Commission lawsuit.
-
February 03, 2023
GoodRx Holdings Hit With Class Action Over Data Sharing
GoodRx has been hit with a lawsuit claiming that it breached state privacy laws by sharing users' sensitive health data with advertisers, days after the digital health care platform agreed to pay $1.5 million to end a federal probe into the alleged practice.