Don't want ads? Subscribe or login now.

Insurers Say They Shouldn't Cover Stanford Counsel

By Brendan Pierson · May 25, 2010, 4:43 PM EDT

Alleged Ponzi schemer Robert Allen Stanford's insurers have asked a federal judge to rule that they are not required to pay for Stanford's latest proposed criminal defense counsel or for his...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Case Information

Case Title

Laura Pendergest-Holt v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London

Case Number

4:09-cv-03712

Court

Texas Southern

Nature of Suit

110(Insurance)

Date Filed

November 17, 2009

Recent Articles By Brendan

August 04, 2010
Sempra's $48.5M Verdict Against Marsh Upheld
July 27, 2010
Brooke Trustee Can Investigate 3rd Parties: Court
July 21, 2010
Stanford Execs Seek Discovery Shield In Lloyd's Suit
July 20, 2010
AMA, Others Sue To Preserve Claims Against Wellpoint
June 28, 2010
Johnson Controls Wins Spat Over CERCLA Coverage
June 28, 2010
High Court Will Hear Cigna's Appeal In Pension Fight
June 18, 2010
Insurers Avoid Coverage For Pension Fund Losses
June 15, 2010
Cyberprivacy Risks Demand A New Kind Of Insurance
June 14, 2010
High Court Won't Hear $88.9M Arch Insurance Dispute
May 26, 2010
UK Fraud Office Drops AIG Financial Products Probe