The Shane Group, Inc. et al v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
Case Number:
2:10-cv-14360
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Bodman PLC
- Brooks Wilkins
- Cohen Milstein
- DiCello Levitt
- Dickinson Wright
- Eimer Stahl
- Fink Bressack
- Foster Swift
- Gibson Dunn
- Gustafson Gluek
- Honigman LLP
- Jones Day
- Lockridge Grindal
- Matthew G. Miller PC
- Miller Canfield
- NachtLaw
- NastLaw
- Novara Tesija
- Sommers Schwartz
- Squire Patton
- Varnum LLP
- Warner Norcross
- Zimmerman Reed
Companies
- Aetna Inc.
- Ascension Health Inc.
- Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Inc.
- Four Winds Casino
- Health Alliance Plan of Michigan
- Henry Ford Health System
- Kent Cos.
- Magna International Inc.
- Metro Health University of Michigan Health
- MidMichigan Health University of Michigan Health System
- Munson Healthcare Inc.
- Oakwood Healthcare Inc.
- Prime Healthcare Services Inc.
- Spectrum Health
- Spectrum Health Systems Inc.
- Spectrum Management Holding Co.
- St. Joseph Health System
- The Cigna Group
- UnitedHealth Group Inc.
- University of Michigan Health System
- Wade Trim Group Inc.
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 12, 2016
Blue Cross Mich. Unveils Revamped $30M Antitrust Settlement
Three months after the Sixth Circuit vacated a $30 million federal class action settlement resolving antitrust claims against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, the parties on Tuesday unveiled a new settlement agreement for the same amount of money.
-
August 25, 2016
26 Companies Can't Wade Into Blue Cross Antitrust Suit
Twenty-six self-insured companies that got the Sixth Circuit to vacate a $30 million settlement resolving class action antitrust claims against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan cannot intervene as the matter proceeds on remand, a federal judge held Thursday, saying the litigation wasn’t remanded to reconsider a previously denied intervention request.
-
July 15, 2016
CORRECTED: 26 Companies Ask To Intervene In Blue Cross Antitrust Suit
Twenty-six self-insured companies that got the Sixth Circuit to vacate a $30 million settlement resolving class action antitrust claims against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan earlier this month asked a Michigan federal court on Wednesday to allow them to intervene as the case proceeds on remand. Correction: A previous version of the story incorrectly reported that the settlement had been overturned and reversed. The story has been updated to reflect that the Sixth Circuit vacated the district court's approval of the deal.
-
April 29, 2015
6th Circ. Asked To Review $30M Blue Cross Settlement
ADAC Automotive and more than two dozen other self-insured entities have turned to the Sixth Circuit in their fight against a $30 million settlement that resolves class action claims that Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan violated antitrust laws by using most favored nation clauses in its contracts, according to court papers filed Wednesday.
-
April 01, 2015
Controversial $30M Blue Cross Antitrust Settlement Approved
A collection of small businesses and individuals on Tuesday won approval of a controversial $30 million settlement with Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, resolving class action claims that the insurer violated antitrust laws by using most favored nation clauses in its contracts.
-
September 25, 2014
26 Cos. Object To $30M Blue Cross Deal In Antitrust Suit
ADAC Automotive and dozens of other self-insured entities urged a Michigan federal court Wednesday to reject a proposed $30 million settlement in a class action claiming Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan violated antitrust laws by using most-favored-nation clauses in its contracts, calling the deal unfair and inadequate.
-
December 03, 2012
Blue Cross Can't Escape Suit Over Favored-Nation Deals
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan on Friday lost a bid to kill a proposed class action claiming the insurer violated antitrust laws by using most-favored-nation clauses in its contracts with hospitals and other health care providers.