Friedman v. Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. et al

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

1:12-cv-02432

Court:

Colorado

Nature of Suit:

Contract: Other

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Wiley Y. Daniel

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. January 05, 2017

    Dollar Thrifty Ducks Rental Car Insurance Add-On Suit

    A Colorado federal judge on Thursday allowed Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group Inc. to escape a lawsuit alleging the unlawful sale of insurance add-ons to consumers, saying that the individual drivers did not suffer harm from the alleged overcharging scheme orchestrated by the rental car company.

  2. July 16, 2015

    Dollar Thrifty Plaintiffs Seek Guidance From Colo. High Court

    A putative class on Wednesday urged a federal judge to certify to the Colorado Supreme Court a question seeking clarification on whether their consumer protection class claims can proceed in a suit accusing Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group of unlawfully selling insurance add-ons.

  3. July 02, 2015

    Judge Reverses Class Cert. In Dollar Thrifty Consumer Case

    A Colorado federal judge on Wednesday reversed his earlier decision certifying a class of consumers suing Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group for the alleged unlawful sale of insurance add-ons, finding the plaintiffs sued the car rental company under a law that doesn't allow for classwide monetary damages.

  4. January 28, 2015

    Lack Of Commonality Dooms Class Cert. Against Dollar Thrifty

    A Colorado federal judge refused to certify a class of 2.6 million Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group customers Tuesday, saying the lead plaintiffs' allegations the car rental company tricks customers into buying unwanted insurance add-ons generates a disparate group of buyers without enough in common.

  5. October 22, 2014

    Dollar Thrifty Renters Seek Cert. In Hidden Fees Suit

    Two customers of Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group Inc. on Wednesday urged a Colorado federal judge to certify a class of millions in Colorado and Florida in a case alleging that the car rental company makes millions by saddling customers with unneeded and unwanted insurance and other services.