January 29, 2015

Eastman et al v. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated

Track this case

Case Number:

3:15-cv-00415

Court:

California Northern

Nature of Suit:

Anti-Trust

Judge:

William H. Orrick

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

View recent docket activity

Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.

Coverage

  1. November 15, 2017

    Quest Row Shows High Court's Antitrust Paradox, Judge Says

    A proposed class of patients accusing Quest Diagnostics Inc. of maintaining a lab services monopoly told an appellate panel Wednesday that a lower court incorrectly acted as "a gatekeeper" by dismissing its suit, prompting a Ninth Circuit judge to lament the U.S. Supreme Court's "de facto different standard for antitrust cases."

6 other articles on this case. View all »

Parties

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Direct access to case information and documents.
  • All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
  • Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
  • No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

View the parties now

Already a subscriber? Click here to login