December 18, 2015
Rosen v. Prudential Retirement Ins & Annuity Co et al
Case Number:
3:15-cv-01839
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Berlandi Nussbaum
- Bottini & Bottini
- Halloran & Sage
- Miller Shah LLP
- Morgan Lewis
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Pullman & Comley
- Sidley Austin
- Webber & Thies
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
January 04, 2017
Prudential Defeats ERISA Suit Over Revenue Sharing
Prudential Retirement Insurance and Annuity Co. has beaten a proposed class action alleging it operates a pay-to-play scheme by forging agreements with mutual funds the suit likens to kickbacks after a Connecticut federal judge ruled Prudential isn't a fiduciary for a plumbing supplies wholesaler's retirement plans.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login