Great American Life Insurance Company v. United States Department of the Interior et al

Track this case

Case Number:

1:16-cv-00699

Court:

Ohio Southern

Nature of Suit:

Contract: Recovery/Enforcement

Judge:

Michael R. Barrett

Firms

  1. June 20, 2024

    DOI Secretary Looks To Ax Insurer's $20M Tribal Loan Claims

    U.S. Department of the Interior Secretary Deb Haaland is seeking a win in a challenge over the cancelation of a $20 million tribal loan guarantee, arguing that an Ohio federal district court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over Great American Life Insurance Co.'s remaining claims.

  2. October 02, 2019

    Insurer Seeks Win On Last Claims Over DOI $20M Tribal Loan

    Great American Life Insurance Co. urged an Ohio federal judge to grant it an early win on its remaining claims against the U.S. Department of the Interior secretary for what the insurer said was an arbitrary cancellation of a $20 million loan guarantee.

  3. June 04, 2019

    DOI Escapes Insurer's $20M Tribal Loan Guarantee Suit

    An Ohio federal judge has gutted litigation accusing the U.S. Department of the Interior and several officials of improperly rejecting an insurer's $20 million claim for losses under a tribal company's guaranteed loan, upholding only a contract allegation against the agency secretary.

  4. November 01, 2016

    DOI Seeks To Gut Insurer's $20M Tribal Loan Guarantee Suit

    The U.S. Department of the Interior on Monday urged an Ohio federal court to toss almost all claims against the agency and several officials over its refusal to pay an insurer for a $20 million guarantee on a loan to a tribal company, saying the court only has jurisdiction over a single breach of contract claim against the department's secretary.

  5. June 28, 2016

    DOI Yanked $20M Loan Guarantee, Hid Records, Insurer Says

    An insurance company accused the U.S. Department of the Interior of arbitrarily canceling a $20 million loan guarantee, violating its own records policies when its decision was challenged and subjecting the insurer to an unfair administrative appeals process in a suit filed Monday in Ohio federal court.