Sayles v. Allstate Insurance Company
Case Number:
3:16-cv-01534
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
-
July 13, 2017
Pa. Judge OKs Allstate Appeal In Medical Exam Suit
A Pennsylvania federal judge agreed Wednesday to allow Allstate Insurance Co. to immediately appeal a decision greenlighting claims in a putative class action challenging a policy provision that allegedly requires auto policyholders to undergo physical examination by insurer-chosen doctors to get medical benefits.
-
June 08, 2017
Policyholder Slams Allstate's Appeal Of Medical Exam Ruling
A car insurance policyholder hit back on Wednesday in Pennsylvania federal court against Allstate's request for an interlocutory appeal of a decision finding a medical examination provision potentially unconstitutional, saying mere disagreement with the ruling did not constitute grounds for appeal.
-
May 25, 2017
Allstate Wants Appeal Of Pa. Law's Application To Policies
Allstate asked a Pennsylvania federal court Wednesday for permission to appeal a ruling that found a provision in its auto policies that allegedly required policyholders to undergo physical examinations by insurer-chosen doctors in order to get medical benefits was in possible violation of Pennsylvania state law.
-
May 11, 2017
Allstate Can't Duck Crash Victims' Medical Exam Suit
A provision in Allstate car insurance policies that allegedly required auto policyholders involved in car accidents to undergo physical examinations by doctors the insurer selected in order to get medical benefits could violate Pennsylvania law, a federal judge ruled Wednesday.
-
July 26, 2016
Allstate Sued Over Car Crash Victims' Unpaid Medical Bills
Allstate is being sued over allegations that it unlawfully refused to pay the medical bills of auto policyholders involved in car accidents unless they agreed to undergo physical examinations, according to a proposed class action removed to Pennsylvania federal court Tuesday.