September 25, 2018
IN RE: Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products Liability Litigation
Case Number:
2873
Court:
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Baron & Budd
- Bell Legal Group
- Cossich Sumich
- Crueger Dickinson
- Douglas & London
- Duffy & Young
- Edelson PC
- Environmental Litigation Group PC
- Ferraro Law Firm
- Greenberg Traurig
- Hausfeld LLP
- Kelley Drye
- Kennedy & Madonna
- Levin Papantonio
- Levin Sedran
- Mayer Brown
- McDivitt Law
- Motley Rice
- Napoli Shkolnik
- Nelson Mullins
- Rogers Patrick
- Saltz Mongeluzzi
- Seeger Weiss
- Sher Edling
- Shook Hardy
- Singleton Schreiber
- Sive Paget
- SL Environmental Law Group
- Stag Liuzza
- Taft Stettinius
- Weitz & Luxenberg
- Williams & Connolly
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
February 01, 2024
Conn. PFAS Water Pollution Suit Escapes Multidistrict Bid
The federal multidistrict litigation panel has denied a Connecticut utility's attempt to funnel a lawsuit arising from PFAS "forever chemicals" into a broader nationwide case, concluding that the claims against Connecticut Water Co. are too different to be lumped into the MDL.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login