Twin City Fire Insurance Company v. SLRA Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:19-cv-06131
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
April 29, 2022
Investment Co. And Insurer Drop $2.5M Defense Cost Dispute
An investment firm and an insurance unit of The Hartford dropped a $2.5 million defense costs coverage dispute over a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission investigation, the policyholder and the carrier told a California federal court on Friday.
-
December 17, 2021
Investment Firm Says Insurer 'Blindsided' It With Litigation
A real estate investment firm urged a California judge to reject its insurer's demand that it repay $2.5 million in defense costs from a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission investigation, arguing that its conduct did not trigger an illegal profit exclusion in its management liability policy.
-
November 19, 2021
Investor, Insurer Both Seek Wins In SEC Coverage Row
Twin City Fire Insurance Co. told a California federal judge it should be reimbursed for the $2.5 million it spent defending an investor in a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission investigation, claiming its excess liability policy barred coverage for illegal profits.