In re Outpatient Medical Center Employee Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
1:21-cv-00305
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Actuate Law
- Bartko LLP
- Fine Kaplan
- Gibson Dunn
- Holland & Knight
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Keller Postman
- King & Spalding
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Lieff Cabraser
- Mason LLP (Washington, DC)
- McDermott Will & Emery
- McGuireWoods
- Milberg Coleman
- Morgan Lewis
- Nussbaum Law Group
- Scharf Banks
- Steven Williams Law
- Wilson Sonsini
Companies
- DaVita Inc.
- Surgical Care Affiliates Inc.
- Tenet Healthcare Corp.
- United Surgical Partners International Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 19, 2021
UnitedHealth Unit Wants Out Of Surgical No-Poach Suits
In a case alleging surgery centers conspired not to hire each other's senior employees, a UnitedHealth Group unit told an Illinois federal judge she shouldn't be the first to hold that a stand-alone nonsolicitation agreement is inherently anti-competitive under federal antitrust law.
-
March 15, 2021
Gov't Wants Surgical No-Poach Suits Iced Amid Criminal Case
U.S. antitrust enforcers are seeking to have their criminal no-poaching case against a UnitedHealth Group surgical unit wrap up before private litigants get a stab at proposed class actions pending against the medical provider in Illinois federal court.
-
January 20, 2021
UnitedHealth Unit Draws 1st Follow-On No-Poach Class Action
The first private follow-on to the U.S. Department of Justice's criminal antitrust case against UnitedHealth Group unit Surgical Care Affiliates LLC has been filed in Illinois federal court as a class action seeking to represent the "hundreds, if not thousands," of senior-level employees impacted by Surgical Care's alleged agreements with competitors not to hire each other's employees.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next →