Michael Sackett, et ux., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Case Number:
21-454
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Firms
- Baker Botts
- Best Best & Krieger
- Complex Appellate Litigation Group
- Consovoy McCarthy
- Covington & Burling
- Crowell & Moring
- Gunster Yoakley
- Hogan Lovells
- Hunton Andrews
- Kassouni Law
- Kazmarek Mowrey
- Kramer Levin
- Mayer Brown
- McDermott Will & Emery
- Perkins Coie
- Pollock Cohen
- Selendy Gay
- Smouse & Mason
- Troutman Pepper
- Venable LLP
- Vinson & Elkins
- Wiley Rein
Companies
- American Petroleum Institute Inc.
- Americans for Prosperity Foundation
- Association of American Railroads
- Atlantic Legal Foundation Inc.
- Cato Institute
- Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
- National Association of Clean Water Agencies
- National Association of Home Builders
- National Cattlemen's Beef Association
- Public Citizen Inc.
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
September 23, 2021
High Court Asked To Revisit Landmark Water Permit Ruling
Idaho landowners who say they should not be forced to apply for a Clean Water Act permit for a home construction project on Wednesday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to revisit a landmark ruling that set guidelines for when the statute applies in permitting decisions.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next →