November 04, 2021
Chung v. Eargo, Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:21-cv-08597
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Bernstein Litowitz
- Block & Leviton
- Latham & Watkins
- Levi & Korsinsky
- Pomerantz LLP
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
January 29, 2024
Hearing Aid Co. Eargo Investors Ask 9th Circ. To Revive Suit
Investors of Eargo Inc. have told the Ninth Circuit that a lower court erred in dismissing their class action against the hearing aid company since they sufficiently alleged the firm and its top brass acted with intent to commit insurance billing fraud.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login