Specialty Lines

Expert Analysis

• 4th Circ. Ruling Continues Trend Of Insurer Bump-Up Wins

  

  The Fourth Circuit's recent decision in Towers Watson v. National Union Fire Insurance, finding no directors and officers insurance coverage for underpayment in a reverse triangular merger, supports an emerging consensus that "acquisition" encompasses a variety of transaction types for the purposes of D&O bump-up exclusions, say Joshua Polster and Charlotte McCary at Simpson Thacher.

• 5th Circ. Ruling Aids Insureds In Contractual Exclusion Rows

  

  The Fifth Circuit's recent insurance decision in Windermere Oaks v. Allied World, in favor of coverage, provides policyholders with guidance on how to distinguish between contractual and noncontractual claims when insurers deploy broadly worded liability exclusions to deny coverage, say Max Louik and David Ledet at Reed Smith.

• Greenwashing Suits May Implicate D&O Policies

  

  As consumers, regulators, and state and local governments seek to use litigation to hold companies responsible for alleged greenwashing, businesses facing such claims have a number of approaches available for seeking insurance coverage under directors and officers policies, say attorneys at Haynes Boone.

• ALI, Bar Groups Need More Defense Engagement For Balance

  

  The American Law Institute and state bar committees have a special role in the development of the law — but if they do not do a better job of including attorneys from the defense bar, they will come to be viewed as special interest advocacy groups, says Mark Behrens at Shook Hardy.

• Private Equity Firms Shouldn't Overlook Cybersecurity Risks

  

  Given the operational, financial and reputational costs at stake, and the growing threat of cybercrime, cybersecurity should be central to deal making, internal governance and post-acquisition management for private equity firms, say Ray Bogenrief and William Ridgway at Skadden.

• ​​​​​​​BIPA Ruling Furthers Mixed Signals On Insurance Coverage

  

  A recent Illinois appellate ruling in Remprex provides another perspective on the issue of insurance coverage for Biometric Information Privacy Act lawsuits, but its reach will be limited, as it did not cover the three exceptions that have been the focus of related federal court decisions, says Charles Insler at HeplerBroom.

• What Texas Misrepresentation Ruling Means For Insurers

  

  The Texas Supreme Court's recent decision in American National Insurance v. Arce, confirming that insurers must prove intent to deceive in order to rescind coverage based on material misrepresentation, solidifies additional burdens for insurers to consider during both the underwriting and claims adjudication processes, say Josh Pedelty and Javon Johnson at Husch Blackwell.

• Less Cyber Coverage, More Compliance Risk For Cos.

  

  Despite recent favorable court decisions recognizing cyber coverage under various policies, policyholders face a challenging road ahead due to insurers' new policy exclusions and regulators' new reporting requirements and increased penalties, say Luma Al-Shibib and Steven Pudell at Anderson Kill.

• Climate Reporting Regs Mean New Risks To Insure

  

  As regulators in the U.S., U.K. and beyond implement new climate-related investment and disclosure requirements for corporations, decision makers should investigate whether their insurance policies offer the right coverage to respond to the legal and regulatory risks of this increased scrutiny, says David Cummings at Reed Smith.

• Md. Abuse Law Makes Past Liability Coverage Review Vital

  

  Maryland is the first state to allow an indefinite lookback period for previously time-barred lawsuits by victims of child sexual abuse against public and private entities — and lawsuits brought under the new law likely will implicate coverage under insurance policies issued over the past 80 years or longer, say Michael Levine and Olivia Bushman at Hunton.

• FTX Proceedings Highlight D&O Issues Amid Bankruptcy

  

  A Delaware bankruptcy judge’s recent refusal of Samuel Bankman-Fried's request to access FTX's directors and officers coverage serves as a reminder of the interplay of bankruptcy law and D&O insurance policies, and some best practices for policyholders when pursuing D&O coverage during bankruptcy, say Geoffrey Fehling and Justin Paget at Hunton.

• 5 Tips For Filing Gov't Notices After Insurance Producer M&A

  

  As insurance producer acquisition activity picks up in 2023, requiring a daunting process of notifying information changes to each Department of Insurance where the entity is licensed, certain best practices will help buyers alleviate frustration and avoid administrative actions and fines, say attorneys at Foley & Lardner.

• Insureds' Notice Pleading May Be Insufficient In Federal Court

  

  A recent New Jersey federal court ruling in Bauman v. Hanover Insurance held that bare-bones notice pleading was insufficient and dismissed the policyholder's coverage complaint, a reminder that courts may require more than an expression of general disagreement with an insurance company's denial letter to proceed with the case, says Eugene Killian at The Killian Firm.