( May 30, 2024, 9:12 AM EDT) -- DETROIT — In consolidated appeals, a Michigan appellate court affirmed a lower court’s judgment for a pedestrian after a jury determined that the pedestrian did not make material misrepresentations in his claim for personal injury protection (PIP) benefits after he was struck by a motor vehicle, finding that though counsel for the pedestrian engaged in “improper” conduct, because the incidents were “isolated,” “reversal is not required.”...