Newsletter RSS

Mealey's Trademarks

  • November 07, 2024

    For Third Time, Judge Rejects Injunction Request In Film Fest Trademark Row

    NEW YORK — A federal judge in New York on Nov. 6 denied a motion for reconsideration for his rejection of a preliminary injunction in a trademark dispute brought by the owner of a South Asian film festival in New York against the owner of another South Asian film festival in both Texas and New York, marking the third time that the judge has rejected a preliminary injunction in the case.

  • November 07, 2024

    Medical Company Can’t Get Defendant’s Ankle Monitor Data In Trademark Dispute

    NEW YORK — A federal magistrate judge in New York said that a plaintiff pharmaceutical company in a trademark counterfeiting dispute is not entitled to have ankle monitor data from a defendant who was convicted of federal fraud counts, holding that granting the request would allow a non-government agency years of surveillance data, which would amount to a massive violation of the man’s constitutional rights.

  • November 06, 2024

    Winning Firm In Data Breach Arbitration Waives Response To Res Judicata Cert Petition

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A company that experienced a 2019 data breach, which led to a canceled business agreement, a trade secret lawsuit and an arbitration in which it prevailed, waived its right to respond to a petition for certiorari in which its former client asks the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in on when a court should decide the preclusive effect of a judgment on a related arbitration.

  • November 06, 2024

    AI Company Opposes Bid For Summary Judgment In Sci Fi-Based Name Battle

    NEW YORK — Defendants asked a federal judge in New York for leave to file a motion for summary judgment in a trademark infringement case, saying their health care-based product is nothing like the plaintiff’s artificial intelligence and specialized microchip company.  But in a motion to strike, the plaintiff said potential confusion among consumers is a fact-intensive analysis and that the court should strike the defendants’ pre-motion letter and deny the relief.

  • November 04, 2024

    U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Trademark Claims From Search Engine Operator

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on Nov. 4 said it will not consider whether the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals was wrong to affirm a Colorado federal judge’s rejection of arguments that Bank of America Corp. (BofA) infringed on an unregistered trademark related to the name “Erica” in relation to computer applications.

  • November 04, 2024

    Supreme Court OKs Government Participation In Trademark Arguments

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The United States government will be allowed to participate in oral argument as an amicus curiae regarding a Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ decision affirming a $43 million disgorgement award entered in a real estate company’s favor in a trademark infringement dispute with an entity it said infringed its marks, the U.S. Supreme Court said in a Nov. 4 order.

  • October 31, 2024

    Judge: Mattel Owed Damages For Chinese Stores’ Fake UNO Cards

    NEW YORK — Holding that a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the extraterritoriality of certain portions of the Lanham Act does not apply, a federal judge in New York on Oct. 30 entered more than $400,000 in damages against Chinese companies that toy and game manufacturer Mattel Inc. said infringed on its trademarks and copyrights related to the card game UNO.

  • October 28, 2024

    Federal Judge Dismisses Last Count In Butter Trademark Row At Plaintiff’s Request

    NEW YORK — A New York federal judge granted a plaintiff food company’s request to voluntarily dismiss a New York state law claim for trade dress dilution against a defendant food company it accused of infringing on the packaging of competing Irish butter brands after previously granting the defendant company’s motion for summary judgment as to all other counts.

  • October 24, 2024

    9th Circuit: Law Firm’s Online Ad Keywords Don’t Infringe On Competitor’s Name

    SAN FRANCISCO — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed an Arizona federal judge’s finding that a defendant law firm’s purchasing of a competitor’s trademark in Google keyword ads was not trademark infringement, agreeing that the plaintiff law firm failed to establish a likelihood of confusion caused by the ads; a judge on the panel issued a concurring opinion arguing that the Ninth Circuit should reconsider the relevant case law.

  • October 22, 2024

    Real Estate Company: High Court Must Affirm $43M Disgorgement In Trademark Case

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A real estate company in an Oct. 22 brief urged the U.S. Supreme Court to affirm the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ decision affirming a $43 million disgorgement award entered in its favor in a trademark infringement dispute with an entity it said infringed upon its marks, arguing that the Lanham Act empowers a court to “consider all competent evidence, including profits of affiliated entities when relevant.”

  • October 22, 2024

    Formula 1 Team Owner Takes Trademark Row With Team Member To 9th Circuit

    LOS ANGELES — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals issued a docket number for a motor vehicle parts company’s appeal of a California federal judge’s holding that a former member of the company’s Formula 1 team and his publisher did not infringe on the company’s trademarks by including photos with the company’s logo in a book about the man’s time in F1.

  • October 22, 2024

    Code Publisher Appeals Injunction Denial For Copyright Claim To 3rd Circuit

    PHILADELPHIA — A publisher of technical standards for several industries on Oct. 21 appealed to the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals a Pennsylvania federal judge’s denial of the publisher’s request for a preliminary injunction against a company it claims posted copies of the plaintiff company’s codes online without permission in violation of copyrights.

  • October 17, 2024

    1st Circuit Won’t Reconsider Order Of New Trial In Copyright Case

    BOSTON — The First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Oct. 16 rejected a guitar seller’s petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, leaving in place a First Circuit panel’s July opinion ordering a new trial in a New Hampshire federal court on claims that the company infringed on a guitar manufacturer’s photo of guitar headstocks by uploading the photo to its own website.

  • October 17, 2024

    Judge Says Cuban Company’s Counterclaim In Rum Mark Row Barred By Statute

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A federal judge in Washington granted a motion from Bacardi & Co. Ltd. and its American subsidiary to dismiss a Cuban rum company’s counterclaim in a 20-year-old dispute over the mark HAVANA CLUB, agreeing with Bacardi that the Cuban company was barred from bringing the claim because the mark was confiscated from it.

  • October 17, 2024

    Panel Issues Split Ruling In Tire Trade Dress Suit On Discovery, Daubert, Privilege

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a long-running trade dress dispute between two tire companies, a Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel partly affirmed a trial court ruling, deeming the asserted trade dress functional and, therefore, not protectable and upholding discovery sanctions and expert testimony exclusion, while reversing in part by finding that litigation privilege barred the defendant’s counterclaims.

  • October 16, 2024

    Pa. Federal Judge Agrees To Trim Counterclaims Filed Against CPAP Equipment Maker

    PITTSBURGH — A federal judge in Pennsylvania partially adopted a magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny a motion filed by SoClean Inc., a manufacturer of equipment that uses ozone to clean and disinfect continuous positive air pressure (CPAP) sleep apnea devices and respirators, to dismiss counterclaims filed by Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC and Philips RS North America LLC (collectively, Philips) but agreed to dismiss the Lanham Act trademark dilution counterclaim and found another claim time-barred.

  • October 15, 2024

    5th Circuit: AI Real Estate Firm Forfeited Arguments On Appeal Of Trademark Suit

    NEW ORLEANS — A panel of judges in the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Oct. 14 dismissed a defendant artificial intelligence-based real estate website’s appeal of a Texas federal judge’s grant of a plaintiff real estate company’s motion to dismiss its trademark claims in the wake of the defendant website’s shuttering; the panel held that the defendant website “forfeited any argument that this court has jurisdiction to hear its appeal.”

  • October 15, 2024

    Federal Judge Dismisses Most Trademark, Patent Claims For Lack Of Jurisdiction

    LOS ANGELES — A federal judge in California dismissed most of the claims brought by a pro se plaintiff who accused a blind manufacturing company of infringing on marks he held, finding that the plaintiff failed to establish personal jurisdiction or that the court was the appropriate venue.

  • October 14, 2024

    Magistrate: Dental Product Maker Can’t Add Copyright Claim To Trademark Suit

    GREENSBORO, N.C. — A plaintiff dental hygiene company cannot amend its trademark infringement complaint to add an allegation that defendant companies that make similar products also infringed on the plaintiff company’s copyright, along with other allegations, a federal magistrate judge in North Carolina held Oct. 11, saying that granting the motion would be prejudicial to the defendant companies.

  • October 14, 2024

    Judge Tosses Much Of Trademark Row Between Queens Ambulance Companies

    NEW YORK — A federal judge in New York allowed trademark infringement claims to survive a motion to dismiss in a dispute between a defendant ambulance company serving neighborhoods in the borough of Queens and a plaintiff company that formerly provided similar services, but dismissed false advertising and a series of other claims brought by the plaintiff ambulance company, holding that the company failed to adequately substantiate the claims.

  • October 14, 2024

    U.S. Government Wants To Participate In High Court Argument In Trademark Case

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. government on Oct. 11 asked the U.S. Supreme Court to allow it to participate as an amicus curiae in oral arguments when the high court considers whether courts under the Lanham Act “can include an order for the defendant to disgorge the distinct profits of legally separate non-party corporate affiliates” and whether the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals improperly upheld a $43 million disgorgement award against the defendant.

  • October 11, 2024

    7th Circuit: New Issues On Appeal Doom Claims For Intellectual Property Royalties

    CHICAGO — The Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed an Indiana federal judge’s dismissal of a breach of contract suit brought by a plaintiff manufacturer who claimed that a defendant manufacturer allegedly failed to pay royalties for a lung-expansion therapy device required by a licensing agreement; the panel noted that the plaintiff company predicated its arguments on appeal on a new theory not raised before the district court.

  • October 09, 2024

    2nd Circuit: Keyword Search Ads Based On Trademarks Not Infringing

    NEW YORK — Affirming a New York federal judge’s entry of judgment on the pleadings in a trademark dispute between competing eyewear brands, the Second Circuit U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Oct. 8 said that “the mere act of purchasing a search engine keyword that is a competitor’s trademark does not alone, in the context of keyword search advertising, constitute trademark infringement.”

  • October 09, 2024

    Parties Stipulate To Dismissal Of Trademark Suit Involving ‘FLORIDA MAN’ Mark

    WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — In a paperless order, a Florida federal judge granted a plaintiff online media company and a defendant event company’s stipulation to dismiss their dispute stemming from the allegedly infringing use of the word mark FLORIDA MAN, after the judge in June held that the mark is not sufficiently famous for the media company’s complaint to survive in full.

  • October 09, 2024

    7th Circuit: No Fees In Trademark Dispute Over Pipes For Smoking

    CHICAGO — A federal judge in Illinois was right to deny a smoking pipe manufacturer’s motion for attorney fees after a plaintiff trademark owner voluntarily dismissed with prejudice his infringement claim against the company, a panel of the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held, finding that the defendant company failed to show how the case is “exceptional” as required for attorney fees under the Lanham Act.