Mealey's Trademarks
-
March 19, 2024
Divided 2nd Circuit Won’t Undo Trademark Fair Use Findings
NEW YORK — A Connecticut federal judge’s determination that use by an appellee of the term “red gold” in connection with gold-copper luxury watches qualifies as fair under federal trademark law will not be disturbed, a panel majority of the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has ruled.
-
March 18, 2024
Executive Can’t Shake Claims Company Infringed ‘Playground AI’ Mark
SAN JOSE, Calif. — Litigation over the “Playground AI” trademark will proceed in California with the founder of the artificial intelligence company Mighty Computing Inc. named as a co-defendant, a federal judge there held in denying a motion to dismiss.
-
March 14, 2024
Subpoena For Deposition In Trademark Opposition Will Stay Quashed, Panel Rules
RICHMOND, Va. — Although with a different rationale than the one espoused by a Virginia federal judge, the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on March 13 upheld an order that quashed a subpoena issued to a foreign entity in opposition proceedings before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
-
March 14, 2024
Designer, PTO Argue If Vulgar Word Was Properly Denied Trademark Registration
WASHINGTON, D.C. — An artist and designer who had four trademark registrations for a vulgar word denied by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) tells the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in his reply brief that the agency inappropriately relied on newly created doctrines regarding commonly used words in rejecting his applications, despite the fact that many other commonly used words have been used as trademarks.
-
March 13, 2024
Per Gucci, Jury Demand In New York Federal Trade Dress Row Stricken
BROOKLYN, N.Y. — A trade dress dispute between two ice cream makers will proceed but not before jurors because a request for disgorged profits is equitable in nature and thus will be decided at a bench trial, a federal judge in New York has ruled.
-
March 12, 2024
Colorado Federal Judge: App Store Notices Not Enough For Jurisdiction
DENVER — A Colorado-based business on March 11 saw its infringement complaint dismissed without prejudice by a federal judge in Colorado, who said trademark notices sent by defendants to the Apple and Google app stores did not rise to the level of “express aiming” at the state.
-
March 12, 2024
Crocs Must Face Defamation Claims In Colorado Over Patent Press Release
DENVER — Allegations by a Canadian shoe seller and former patent infringement defendant that it was defamed in a press release by Crocs Inc. that touted a settlement of their longstanding litigation as a “judgment of infringement” were deemed plausible on March 11 by a federal judge in Colorado.
-
March 11, 2024
Judge Amends Consent Decree Order In Case Over Alleged Counterfeit Policies
LOUISVILLE, Ky. — In a March 8 amended ruling entering a consent decree in a sprawling suit over allegations of fraud, trademark counterfeiting and trademark infringement involving captive reinsurance programs, a Kentucky federal judge said he “inadvertently omitted the names of two parties.”
-
March 11, 2024
Nevada Federal Judge Modifies Injunction After Finding Mark Use Not Fair
LAS VEGAS — On the heels of concluding, upon reconsideration, that a defendant did not fairly use “TASER” in connection with its conducted-energy weapon (CEW) refurbishing business, a federal judge in Nevada on March 8 modified her earlier permanent injunction.
-
March 11, 2024
Judge Won’t Overturn Jury’s $2.3M Verdict In Tobacco Rolling Papers Dispute
ATLANTA — A Georgia federal judge denied two defense motions asking the court to deem excessive or reduce a $2.3 million jury verdict against them for trademark infringement against a rolling papers company and order a new trial, finding that the jury properly weighed the evidence and that its verdict was proper.
-
March 07, 2024
Fee Award Slashed, But Dismissal Of Lanham Act, Copyright Claims Upheld
SAN FRANCISCO — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on March 6 did not reach allegations by two appellants that the “idea-expression dichotomy” under federal copyright law is unconstitutional, deeming the position waived in view of their failure to raise it before an Oregon federal magistrate judge.
-
March 05, 2024
Minnesota Federal Judge: Product And Product Trademark Are Distinct
MINNEAPOLIS — A Minnesota federal judge on March 4 rejected a plaintiff’s claim that a contractual provision directing a distributor to “discontinue use of any and all . . . trademarks” in the event of termination “encompasses an obligation to stop selling” its remaining inventory.
-
March 04, 2024
Both Parties Win Interim Relief, But More Briefing Sought In Trademark Row
NEW YORK — On remand from the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for a second time, a federal judge in New York on March 1 tweaked her earlier preliminary junction but directed a bridal gown company and its former designer to further brief the “issues raised” in a recent appellate decision.
-
February 27, 2024
Defense Motion Denied By Illinois Federal Judge In ‘Tribe’ Trademark Case
CHICAGO — In a Feb. 26 opinion, a federal judge in Illinois declined to decide whether, as asserted by two infringement defendants, the term “tribe” cannot be trademarked.
-
February 26, 2024
NBC Must Face Claims ‘Time Machine’ Car Infringes DeLorean Mark
LOS ANGELES — Although agreeing with NBCUniversal Media LLC (NBCU) that allegations of breach of contract leveled by DeLorean Motor Co. (DMCT) over royalties associated with the use of a modified DeLorean DMC-12 “Time Machine” car in the “Back to the Future” film franchise fail for lack of standing, a federal judge in California said disputes of material fact preclude summary judgment on DMCT’s related trademark infringement claims.
-
February 23, 2024
Amici Tell High Court Jury Should Decide Likelihood Of Confusion
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Filing a brief in favor of neither party in a dispute over the “Home Chef” trademark, amici curiae comprising “law school faculty and students” urge the U.S. Supreme Court to resolve a circuit split over the proper way to determine when there is a likelihood of confusion between two marks, stressing the importance of having a single national standard on this matter and contending that it should be a deference standard in which juries make such decisions.
-
February 21, 2024
Trademark, Copyright Owner Denied Summary Judgment By Illinois Federal Judge
CHICAGO — Citing a plaintiff’s “trend of under-developing arguments” in trademark and copyright litigation over its continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) filters, a federal judge in Illinois denied summary judgment, finding — among other things — that there is “no case law supporting the proposition that a product itself . . . can constitute a spurious mark for the purposes of establishing a counterfeit.”
-
February 20, 2024
Interlocutory Appeal Of Relief In Trade Dress, Patent Case Succeeds
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A federal judge in Texas abused his discretion in preliminarily enjoining a patent and trade dress infringement defendant from operating its trampoline park, the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said Feb. 16.
-
February 16, 2024
In IP Row With Former Firm, Accused Engineer Defends Summary Judgment
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A federal judge in Utah correctly rejected on summary judgment a patent and copyright owner’s case in full against a former employee and his new, competing company, the employee and company tell the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in an appellee brief.
-
February 16, 2024
Petition To Cancel ‘Babies’ Magic Tea’ Trademark Reinstated By Panel
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board must revisit its finding of no likely confusion between the “Baby Magic” and “Babies’ Magic Tea” trademarks, the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals concluded Feb. 15.
-
February 15, 2024
Request For Contempt Finding In Trademark, Design Patent Case Denied
HOUSTON — A federal judge in Texas on Feb. 14 rejected as premature allegations that a defendant has violated a stipulated preliminary injunction in a trademark and design patent infringement case by manufacturing and selling a redesigned floating pool chaise.
-
February 15, 2024
RICO Claim Tossed From Suit Alleging App Captures Data With Cyberpirated Marks
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A federal judge in California denied arbitration and dismissed a Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act claim from a putative class complaint accusing a software company of collecting and selling personal data from a budgeting application for smartphones and of using cyberpirated trademarks and other information to entice users to enter their banking information but permitted the app user’s remaining claims under Utah and California law to proceed.
-
February 14, 2024
Consent Decree Entered Under 1 Dismissal In Case Over Alleged Counterfeit Policies
LOUISVILLE, Ky. — A variety of claims and parties have been dismissed under agreements in a sprawling suit over allegations of fraud, trademark counterfeiting and trademark infringement involving captive reinsurance programs, with a Kentucky federal court permanently enjoining two defendants “from future infringement of Plaintiffs’ trademarks.”
-
February 14, 2024
Injunction Entered Under Agreement To Resolve Lloyd’s Trademark Infringement Case
HOUSTON — After Lloyd’s America Inc. and Corporation of Lloyd’s and the individual they sued over alleged defamation and trademark infringement reported reaching an agreement to resolve the suit, a Texas federal court entered a permanent injunction according to the terms of their agreement.
-
February 14, 2024
Challenge To USPTO Domicile Address Rule Turned Away By Panel
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A rule that bars reliance on a P.O. Box address in the broader U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) requirement that trademark applicants list domestic counsel was not arbitrarily enforced against a law firm, the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said Feb. 13.