Mealey's Construction Defects Insurance
-
December 19, 2024
Va. Judge Dismisses Contractor’s Counterclaim, Awards Judgment To Excess Insurer
FAIRFAX, Va. — Finding that a second-layer excess insurer did not breach its contract with its construction manager insured when it failed to indemnify the insured for its $24 million contribution to settle construction defects alleged by its client, a Virginia judge dismissed the insured’s counterclaim and entered judgment in favor of the insurer.
-
December 18, 2024
Breach Of Contract, Insurance Code Claims Dismissed In Leaky Roof Coverage Suit
McALLEN, Texas — After reviewing a magistrate’s judge’s memorandum and recommendation to which both parties in a suit over coverage for a leaky replacement roof objected, a federal judge in Texas found no error and adopted the recommendation, dismissing without prejudice the property owner’s breach of contract action against a subcontractor’s insurer and dismissing with prejudice Insurance Code claims against the insurer brought on behalf of the deceased subcontractor.
-
December 17, 2024
Massachusetts Magistrate Judge Compels Roof Material Maker To Disclose Documents
SPRINGFIELD, Mass. — A Massachusetts federal magistrate judge has granted an order compelling a roof coating maker to produce relevant documents in a construction defect suit and related insurance coverage litigation.
-
December 16, 2024
Coverage Dispute Over Conveyance Pipe Construction Closed After Dismissals
SEATTLE — Following several orders granting stipulated motions to dismiss, a federal court in Washington has issued a judgment ordering a coverage dispute over faulty construction allegations related to a conveyance pipe for a sewer overflow control project to be closed.
-
December 16, 2024
Federal Judge Refuses To Dismiss Bad Faith Suit Arising From Roof Damage
SIOUX FALLS, S.D. — A federal judge in South Dakota denied a property insurer’s motion to dismiss insureds’ breach of contract, bad faith and declaratory judgment lawsuit prompted by the insurer’s denial of coverage for damage to the insureds’ roof under the policy exclusion due to faulty construction or design, finding that the court is not convinced the insureds’ alleged loss arose out of the weight of water or ice.
-
December 16, 2024
5th Circuit: No Coverage For Insured’s Loss Due To Surface Water, Faulty Workmanship
NEW ORLEANS — The Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a lower federal court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of a homeowners insurer in an insured’s breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit arising from a pool deck renovation that caused water damage to the insured’s rental property, finding that the undisputed evidence attributes the insured’s loss to surface water and faulty workmanship, which are excluded from coverage.
-
December 12, 2024
Lower Court Properly Found Coverage Is Not Owed For Entire Building, Panel Says
CINCINNATI — The Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Dec. 11 affirmed a district court’s ruling that coverage is only owed for a portion of a wall that collapsed in a building that was undergoing renovation, agreeing with the lower court’s finding that a partial collapse is not the same as a collapse as defined in the policy issued to a building owner and contractor.
-
December 12, 2024
Washington Federal Judge Refuses To Enter Summary Judgment On Bad Faith Claim
SEATTLE — An insured condominium association is not entitled to summary judgment on a bad faith claim in a dispute over coverage for hidden water damage, a Washington federal judge said after determining that questions of fact exist on the issue of when the insured discovered the damage.
-
December 11, 2024
Insurer Ask 7th Circuit To Reconsider Ruling That It Has Duty To Defend Architect
CHICAGO — A commercial general liability insurer filed a petition asking the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals to reconsider an earlier ruling that it has a duty to defend its architectural company insured against an underlying lawsuit asserting that it inadequately designed and oversaw the construction of an Iowa building, challenging the Seventh Circuit’s finding that the intervening decision by the Illinois Supreme Court in Acuity v. M/I Homes of Chicago, LLC indicates that the insurer owes an underlying defense.
-
December 06, 2024
Justice Severs Coverage Issues In Suit Over Damage Caused By Construction Project
NEW YORK — A New York justice consolidated two subrogation lawsuits that involve indemnification and negligence claims arising from alleged property damage that was caused by the same construction project and granted an insurer’s motion to sever the coverage claims from the consolidated subrogation claims.
-
December 06, 2024
Contractor, Subcontractors Explore Possible Settlement Before Further Discovery
BOSTON — A contractor and subcontractors filed a joint status report in a dispute stemming from allegedly faulty installation of flooring at a construction project in New Jersey, telling a Massachusetts federal court that “they are interested in exploring the possibility of settlement before engaging in further discovery.”
-
December 05, 2024
N.Y. Justice: Earth Movement Exclusion Unmistakably Excludes Coverage For Damage
BROOKLYN, N.Y. — A New York justice held that the language in a general liability insurance policy’s earth movement exclusion “specifically, clearly, and unmistakably excludes coverage for the damage” at issue and that a concrete company lacks standing to bring an application for reargument of the court’s earlier ruling that granted insurers’ motion to dismiss a third-party complaint brought by a property owner and a construction manager.
-
December 03, 2024
Appellate Briefing Complete In Construction Insurance Dispute Over Sprinkler Leak
BATON ROUGE, La. — An excess insurer filed its reply brief in the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals defending its appeal of a Louisiana federal court’s rulings that first granted a manufacturer’s motion for summary judgment in a construction insurance dispute stemming from damages caused by a sprinkler leak and then dismissed all of the excess insurer’s claims against the manufacturer with prejudice.
-
December 02, 2024
CGL Insurer Has Duty To Defend Architect Against Defect Suit, 7th Circuit Rules
CHICAGO — The Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held that a commercial general liability insurer has a duty to defend its architectural company insured against an underlying lawsuit asserting that it inadequately designed and oversaw the construction of an Iowa building, finding that the intervening decision by the Illinois Supreme Court in Acuity v. M/I Homes of Chicago, LLC indicates that the insurer owes an underlying defense.
-
December 02, 2024
Construction Company Alleges Bad Faith Cross-Claim Against CGL Insurer
SACRAMENTO, Calif. —A construction company insured answered a commercial general liability insurer’s first amended complaint and filed cross-claims for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and seeks equitable contribution as assignee of an excess insurer that funded its $2,250,000 settlement of an underlying construction defects lawsuit.
-
November 27, 2024
Federal Judge Rules For CGL Insurer In General Contractor’s Breach Of Contract Suit
BROOKLYN, N.Y. — A federal judge in Wisconsin granted a commercial general liability insurer’s motion for summary judgment in a general contractor insured’s breach of contract and declaratory judgment lawsuit seeking reimbursement for its cost of replacing defective covers for digesters that were owned by two agricultural companies, concluding that the insured has failed to submit admissible evidence to support its claim that coverage exists under the policy for “property damage” that was caused by an “occurrence” or that coverage exists under the policy’s “products-completed operations hazards” provision.
-
November 25, 2024
Insurer’s Subrogation Suit Over Water Damage Dismissed After Parties Settle
AKRON, Ohio — Noting that the parties indicated that they reached a settlement, a federal magistrate judge in Ohio dismissed a property insurer’s subrogation lawsuit alleging that a subcontractor’s negligence in installing a fire suppression system caused millions in water damage.
-
November 21, 2024
Insurer Prejudiced By Developer’s Late Notice Of Claim, New York Justice Rules
NEW YORK — A New York justice granted an insurer’s motion to dismiss claims and cross-claims against it in a coverage dispute over damages from excavation work, finding that the insurer was prejudiced by the developer’s late notice of the claim.
-
November 18, 2024
Judge: CGL Insurer Has No Duty To Indemnify Contractor For Negligent Work Claims
SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge in California granted a commercial general liability insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment seeking a declaration that it has no duty to indemnify its contractor insured against an underlying lawsuit alleging the insured performed negligent contractor work, finding there are no triable questions of material fact and coverage is excluded for the damages alleged in the underlying lawsuit.
-
November 18, 2024
Judge Dismisses 1 Insurer From Bad Faith Suit Arising From Construction Defects
DENVER — Following the parties’ joint stipulation of dismissal, a federal judge in Colorado dismissed with prejudice one insurer from a plaintiff insurers breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit seeking recovery of the defense and settlement costs that it paid on behalf of its general contractor insured in an underlying construction defects lawsuit.
-
November 11, 2024
1st Circuit Affirms Insurer Has No Duty To Defend Contractor On Different Grounds
BOSTON — The First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Nov. 8 affirmed a Massachusetts federal court’s order of final judgment in favor of a commercial general liability insurer and two intervenor plaintiffs in a declaratory judgment lawsuit in which the insurer alleged that it owed a contractor and his two construction companies no duty to defend against lawsuits accusing them of breach of contract in connection with construction defects at an apartment complex in New Jersey, focusing on the policy’s “your work” exclusion in finding that coverage is barred.
-
November 11, 2024
Policy’s ‘Your Work,’ ‘Stucco’ Exclusions Do Not Bar Coverage, Federal Judge Rules
ORLANDO, Fla. — A federal judge in Florida denied an insurer’s motion for summary judgment and granted the defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment in the insurer’s lawsuit seeking a declaration as to coverage for construction-related damages at a condominium development, rejecting the insurer’s argument that the insurance policy’s “your work” and stucco exclusions bar coverage.
-
November 08, 2024
Judge Partly Grants Subcontractor’s Motion To Dismiss Insurer’s Coverage Suit
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. — A federal judge in Alabama granted a subcontractor’s motion to dismiss an insurer’s request for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to indemnify the subcontractor against an underlying lawsuit alleging claims for breach of implied warranty of fitness, breach of implied warranty of good workmanship, breach of contract and common-law indemnity because the indemnification claim is not ripe but allowed the insurer’s claims seeking a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend to proceed.
-
November 05, 2024
Contractor Supports Appeal Of $2.3 Million Arbitration Award In Favor Of Insurer
NEW YORK — Replying to insurers’ assertion that its argument on appeal is a “baffling hodgepodge of factual omissions, misstatements of fact, and misapplications of law,” a general contractor countered that the insurers’ argument “reads as a disturbing, conspiratorial, accusatory tirade” and asked the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals to reverse a decision upholding an arbitration panel’s award of a $2.3 million judgment in the insurers’ favor as part of a settlement with a subcontractor that the insurers said provided faulty concrete work for a construction project.
-
November 05, 2024
Judge Refuses To Dismiss Insurer’s Suit Disputing Coverage For Negligence Claims
LOS ANGELES — A federal judge in California refused to dismiss an insurer’s lawsuit disputing coverage for an underlying negligence lawsuit brought against its interior designer insured, finding that its duty to hear the declaratory claims is mandatory because the insurer also seeks reimbursement from its insured for the underlying defense costs.