Mealey's Cyber Tech & E-Commerce

  • August 23, 2024

    6th Circuit Remands For Development Of Record In Row Over Facebook Deletions

    CINCINNATI — On remand from the U.S. Supreme Court, which ruled that the state action doctrine requires showing that an official has the authority to speak on behalf of the entity he represents and exercised that authority, the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals remanded to a district court for further development of the record a suit filed by a man whose posts were deleted from a public official’s personal Facebook account.

  • August 23, 2024

    9th Circuit Won’t Revive Crypto Law Firm’s Suit Against SEC

    SAN FRANCISCO — A panel of judges in the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held Aug. 22 that a cryptocurrency-focused law firm lacked standing to bring a suit against the Securities and Exchange Commission because the firm failed to show that it was in danger of being subject to enforcement action over its use of the cryptocurrency network Ethereum, affirming a California federal judge’s decision to dismiss the firm’s case last year.

  • August 22, 2024

    Record Labels, ISP Both Complain Of 4th Circuit’s Copyright Holding To High Court

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — In dueling petitions for a writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court, a group of record labels and music publishers say the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals wrongly vacated a $1 billion award for vicarious copyright infringement by an internet service provider (ISP), while the ISP argues the Fourth Circuit erred in finding it is liable for contributory infringement.

  • August 22, 2024

    9th Circuit Affirms Dismissal Of Data Theft Claims Against Auto Insurer

    SAN FRANCISCO — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Aug. 21 affirmed the dismissal with prejudice of a putative class action brought against an auto insurer for failure to protect three individuals’ personal data, specifically their driver’s license numbers, from a hack of its online insurance quoting system, after finding that none of the appellants suffered an injury.

  • August 21, 2024

    9th Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment In Chrome Users’ Data Collection Suit

    SAN FRANCISCO — A Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on Aug. 20 reversed a California federal judge’s entry of summary judgment on claims brought by users of Google LLC’s web browser app Chrome for collecting their personally identifiable information (PII) allegedly in violation of privacy laws and California’s unfair competition law (UCL), writing that the District Court did not properly apply the “reasonable person” standard.

  • August 21, 2024

    Judge Sets Hearing Date In Ad Tech Antitrust Suit As To Google’s Chat Deletion

    ALEXANDRIA, Va. — A Virginia federal judge issued an order setting a hearing date to address an adverse inference motion filed by the U.S. government and 17 states related to Google’s purported deletion of chat evidence and the plaintiffs’ argument that Google’s auto deletion policy of internal company chats after 24 hours has harmed them in their antitrust violation suit accusing the tech giant of monopolizing the online digital advertising market.

  • August 20, 2024

    9th Circuit Affirms Injunction Over 1st Amendment Issues With Online Privacy Act

    SAN FRANCISCO — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed in part a district court’s order granting a preliminary injunction to a trade association of online businesses in its suit challenging the California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (CAADCA), which was enacted to provide online privacy protections for children under 18, finding that the association was likely to succeed in showing that the act’s requirement for covered businesses to opine on and reduce the risk of children’s exposure to possibly harmful material violates the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

  • August 14, 2024

    9th Circuit Partly Revives Investor’s Price-Fixing Claim Against Crypto Outfits

    SAN FRANCISCO — A panel of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals partially revived a putative class complaint brought by an investor against several cryptocurrency companies, alleging that they conspired to deflate the value of a crypto asset, holding that an Arizona federal judge erred in holding that the investor failed to establish personal jurisdiction regarding the crypto companies.

  • August 14, 2024

    Data Breach Class Complaint Against Restaurant Group Sent Back To State Court

    LOS ANGELES — A putative class complaint accusing Panda Restaurant Group Inc. of failing to have sufficient measures in place to protect customers’ personal data belongs in state court, a federal judge in California ruled, opining that even though the data breach affected the operator of more than 2,000 restaurants in 30 states, the plaintiff is free to limited his proposed class to California customers.

  • August 14, 2024

    FTC Offers Principles For ‘Relief’ In Google Antitrust Litigation With Epic Games

    SAN FRANCISCO — Eight months after a jury entered a verdict in favor or Epic Games Inc. in its antitrust dispute with Google LLC over the Android app market, the Federal Trade Commission filed an amicus curiae brief in a California federal court seeking to assist the court with its remedy to address Google’s “illegal conduct,” asserting that the court should “consider the particular characteristics of digital markets” and their dynamics to address “the need for remedies that go beyond purely prohibitory injunctions in digital markets.”

  • August 14, 2024

    Panel Vacates Ruling In Coverage Suit Over Claim Tinder Misappropriated Idea

    NEW YORK — The Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Aug. 13 vacated a lower federal court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of an insured and remanded for the lower court to determine in the first instance whether a New York statute might affect the timeliness of the insured’s notice of an underlying claim alleging that Tinder Inc. misappropriated a product-development consultant’s idea for a “Super Like” feature on the Tinder dating app without giving him the “promised compensation.”

  • August 13, 2024

    Split 9th Circuit Affirms Dismissal Of Challenge To Meta’s Vaccine Post Censorship

    PASADENA, Calif. — A split Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a district court’s dismissal of the Children’s Health Defense’s (CHD) suit alleging that Meta Platforms Inc. (formerly Facebook Inc.) violated the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution by censoring what CHD says are accurate posts challenging the government’s “orthodoxy” as to the safety of vaccines, finding that Meta, as a private corporation, cannot be treated as a state actor for constitutional purposes because CHD failed to show that Meta’s censorship was a provision of federal law.

  • August 12, 2024

    Government Seeks Sanctions For Google’s Chat Deletion In Ad Tech Antitrust Suit

    ALEXANDRIA, Va. — The U.S. government and 17 states filed a motion in a Virginia federal court for an adverse inference related to Google’s purported deletion of chat evidence, arguing that Google’s auto deletion policy of internal company chats after 24 hours has harmed the plaintiffs in their antitrust violation suit accusing the tech giant of monopolizing the online digital advertising market.

  • August 09, 2024

    X Corp. Says Advertisers’ Illegal Group Boycott Caused ‘Massive Economic Harm’

    WICHITA FALLS, Texas — X Corp., formerly known as Twitter Inc., sued advertisers in a Texas federal court, alleging that they violated antitrust laws in boycotting the social media platform Twitter “abruptly and in lockstep, . . . by discontinuing entirely or substantially reducing their previously substantial advertising purchases.”

  • August 09, 2024

    Class Suit Filed Against Delta Over CrowdStrike Crash Causing Flight Cancellations

    ATLANTA  — Delta Air Lines passengers whose flights were canceled as a result of an automatic update to CrowdStrike’s cybersecurity software that caused computers, including those used by Delta, to crash filed a putative class action suit in a Georgia federal court, asserting that Delta violated its policies to provide flight refunds, hotel accommodations and related expenses when flights were canceled by breaching its contract with customers, resulting in them spending additional funds for alternative transportation methods.

  • August 09, 2024

    Judge Denies Roblox’s Bid To Arbitrate Couple’s ‘Child Exploitation’ Claims

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge on Aug. 8 denied online video game developer Roblox Corp.’s motion to compel arbitration of putative class claims that it violates California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws by intentionally addicting children to its online game, which requires purchases of in-game currency to play, writing that Roblox did not show that the parents who filed the suit ever read or consented to its arbitration agreement.

  • August 09, 2024

    Magistrate Judge: Crypto Exchange Not Subject To U.S. Securities Laws

    AUSTIN, Texas — A federal magistrate judge in Texas recommended that a putative class complaint brought by investors who say an online crypto asset exchange and its organizers misled them by saying their investment was risk free should be dismissed without prejudice, writing that the complaint should proceed in an Israeli court because the crypto organization is registered as an entity in Israel and lacked sufficient contact with the United States.

  • August 08, 2024

    Federal Judge Orders $125M Civil Penalty Against Crypto Firm In SEC Enforcement

    NEW YORK — A crypto asset firm will be required to pay more than $120 million as a civil penalty after a New York federal judge on Aug. 7 granted the Securities and Exchange Commission’s motion for entry of final judgment on the commission’s allegations that cryptocurrencies sold by the firm were effectively unregistered securities.

  • August 08, 2024

    Impacted Air Travelers Sue CrowdStrike For Causing ‘Catastrophic’ Outage

    AUSTIN, Texas — A group of airplane travelers filed a putative class complaint in Texas federal court against tech company CrowdStrike Inc. accusing it of harming them by failing to properly test its cybersecurity software before issuing an update that allegedly caused 8.5 million computers and devices to go offline, including at airports, delaying their flights in violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws.

  • August 08, 2024

    Restaurants’ Lanham Act Claims Against Grubhub Largely Survive Dismissal Motion

    CHICAGO — A federal judge in Illinois said seven of nine restaurants who brought trademark violation claims in a putative class complaint against Grubhub Inc., alleging that the company included their names and logos on its food delivery app without the restaurants’ permission, failed to show that they have a protectible trademark interest, while the claims from the remaining two restaurants are adequately pleaded.

  • August 07, 2024

    D.C. Circuit Affirms Finding That DMCA Does Not Run Afoul Of 1st Amendment

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel rejected two technologists’ challenge to the constitutionality of certain provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), holding that a federal district court rightly enforced the statute’s anti-circumvention provision with regard to technological protection measures (TPMs).

  • August 06, 2024

    Twitter: High Court Rulings Show Lower Court Correctly Tossed Free Speech Claims

    PASADENA, Calif. — In a supplemental brief filed in the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Twitter argues that recent U.S. Supreme Court First Amendment rulings finding that private conduct can be “attributable to the government” only when the private party’s decision relates to “government coercion” support its argument that a district court correctly dismissed claims by former President Donald J. Trump and other Twitter users because they failed to allege that suspension of their accounts was a “state action.”

  • August 06, 2024

    Judge Finds Google Liable For Market Monopoly In Sherman Act Antitrust Suit

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A District of Columbia federal judge ruled Aug. 5 that Google violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act by keeping “its monopoly in two product markets in the United States — general search services and general text advertising — through its exclusive distribution agreements,” but that “Google lacks monopoly power in the market for search ads.”

  • August 06, 2024

    Judge Won’t Rethink Partial Dismissal Of Stock Drop Suit Against AI Lending Firm

    CINCINNATI — A federal judge in Ohio on Aug. 5 denied a lending platform’s motion to reconsider a ruling that claims made by shareholders about the platform’s use of artificial intelligence to approve loans are actionable, holding that the lending platform incorrectly argued that the investors’ inability to establish a single factor in a multi-factor test to determine scienter “is so essential that its inapplicability is fatal to Plaintiffs’ claims.”

  • August 05, 2024

    DOJ Complaint Accuses ByteDance, TikTok Of Violating Children’s Privacy Laws

    LOS ANGELES — The United States filed a complaint Aug. 2 in a federal court in California accusing TikTok Inc., ByteDance Ltd. and their affiliates of violating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and its implementing regulations as well as a 2019 court order by knowingly permitting children to create regular rather than “Kids Mode” TikTok accounts and to create, view and share videos and messages with adults.