Destroyed-Mural Suit Can Proceed, But Artist Needs Contracts

By Matthew Santoni · September 17, 2019, 4:59 PM EDT

A Pittsburgh mural artist can proceed with his claims that several of his projects destroyed by redevelopment were works of art protected by federal law, but he needs to come up...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Order

Case Information

Case Title

HOLBROOK v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al

Case Number

Court

Pennsylvania Western

Nature of Suit

Copyright

Date Filed

April 27, 2018

Recent Articles By Matthew

November 15, 2024
Pa. Top Court Snapshot: Silent Partners, Skill Games In Nov.
November 04, 2024
Shell Slips Negligence Claim In Pa. Nuisance Lawsuit
October 03, 2024
Sens. Question If Payouts Taint Execs' Push For US Steel Deal
September 27, 2024
Deal Cools Sale Broker's Beef With Cold-Cheese Pizzeria
September 26, 2024
Oil Co. Can Escape Most Claims In Shell Fraud Suit
September 20, 2024
Entrepreneur Says Partners Stiffed Him On Testing Site Deal
August 29, 2024
Counterclaims Cut From $12.1M Home Security Contract Suit
August 27, 2024
Reports On 76ers Arena Proposal Don't Allay Chinatown's Fears
August 21, 2024
3rd Circ. Affirms Health Chain Win In Pa. Hospital Sale Dispute
August 20, 2024
Pa. Justices Say No Public Benefit To Railroad Land Grab